Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Governing environmental conflicts in China: Lessons learned from the case of the Liulitun waste incineration power plant in Beijing

Governing environmental conflicts in China: Lessons learned from the case of the Liulitun waste... China’s growing number of environmental conflicts represents a significant challenge to local governments, who are charged with responding to, and resolving disputes. However, little is known about how these environmental conflicts are resolved. This article reports an in-depth case study concerning the construction of a waste incineration power plant in Liulitun, Beijing, which was strongly opposed by local residents. We argue that the Chinese state is responsive to the demands of citizens and continuously adjusts its strategies in resolving social conflicts. We first identify six different government strategies: go-alone, suppression, tension reduction, giving in, nonassisted negotiation, and mediation. Then, we distinguish six conditions that explain the application of government strategies: the nature of protests, the position of higher level governments, the stage of the project, the involvement of national mass media, the involvement of activists, and the occurrence of events. We find that local governments in Beijing changed their strategies from go-alone, to tension reduction, to giving in, and the six conditions identified are useful in explaining these changes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Public Policy and Administration SAGE

Governing environmental conflicts in China: Lessons learned from the case of the Liulitun waste incineration power plant in Beijing

Public Policy and Administration , Volume 34 (2): 21 – Apr 1, 2019

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/governing-environmental-conflicts-in-china-lessons-learned-from-the-EIWqhvWgH0

References (26)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2017
ISSN
0952-0767
eISSN
1749-4192
DOI
10.1177/0952076717709521
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

China’s growing number of environmental conflicts represents a significant challenge to local governments, who are charged with responding to, and resolving disputes. However, little is known about how these environmental conflicts are resolved. This article reports an in-depth case study concerning the construction of a waste incineration power plant in Liulitun, Beijing, which was strongly opposed by local residents. We argue that the Chinese state is responsive to the demands of citizens and continuously adjusts its strategies in resolving social conflicts. We first identify six different government strategies: go-alone, suppression, tension reduction, giving in, nonassisted negotiation, and mediation. Then, we distinguish six conditions that explain the application of government strategies: the nature of protests, the position of higher level governments, the stage of the project, the involvement of national mass media, the involvement of activists, and the occurrence of events. We find that local governments in Beijing changed their strategies from go-alone, to tension reduction, to giving in, and the six conditions identified are useful in explaining these changes.

Journal

Public Policy and AdministrationSAGE

Published: Apr 1, 2019

There are no references for this article.