Gendered Activation at the Expense of Gender Equality? Activation and Gender Equality as Competing Logics in the Swedish Welfare State

Ellen Parsland; Rickard Ulmestig

doi:10.1177/08861099211045977

Gendered Activation at the Expense of Gender Equality? Activation and Gender Equality as Competing Logics in the Swedish Welfare State

Parsland, Ellen; Ulmestig, Rickard 2022-05-01 00:00:00 This study aims to understand how goals of activation and gender equality interact in labor market programs directed towards activating unemployed participants. The study draws on interviews with 28 social workers and managers at four Swedish municipally governed labor market programs typ- ically targeted towards poor, unemployed individuals with little to no attachment to the labor mar- ket or social insurance system. Our ﬁndings show that activation goals are understood to be clear cut and a dominant logic within the labor market programs. The gender equality goals are under- stood as fuzzy and subordinate to the activation logic. Our theoretical analysis, based on neo-insti- tutional theory, shows that gendered activation as a hybrid logic is created within the four programs as a means of handling the competing logics of gender equality and activation. Gendered activation may be reasonable on an individual level, where women in long-term unemployment can sustain a higher income through work and become ﬁnancially independent. In the context of the gender seg- regated labor market, gendered activation reproduces gendered inequalities when an increasing interest for activation policy among welfare states overshadows claims of gender equality. Furthermore, our study exempliﬁes the systemic reproduction of racist discourse within social- and labour market policies. Within the logic of gendered activation, migrant women become singled out as speciﬁcally problematic for Swedish society to handle when unemployment is given gendered and cultural explanations. Through the logic of gendered activation, gender equality goals become no-matter-what employment rather than employment leading to equal outcomes. Keywords activation, gender equality, social work practice, Swedish welfare state, women in poverty Received August 5, 2020; revised April 27, 2021; accepted August 25, 2021 PhD-candidate, School of Social Work, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Associate professor, Department of Social Work, Linnæus University, Kalmar, Sweden Corresponding Author: Ellen Parsland, School of Social Work, Lund University, Box 23, Lund 22100, Sweden. Email: Ellen.parsland@soch.lu.se 280 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) Introduction Activation refers to policies that enforce participation in the labour market by making beneﬁts con- ditional on active participation in employment programs. Claims of activation and gender equality have gone hand in hand over the last few decades to become powerful claims for welfare states ﬁght- ing injustice and inequality in society (cf. Jenson, 2015; Lister, 2009; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). In Sweden, the activation trend is connected to the classic active labor market policy (Geldof, 1999; Giddens, 2013). Today, activation has a great inﬂuence on how Sweden tries to estab- lish and re-establish people in the labor market (Panican & Johansson, 2016). In parallel, gender equality has been a vital component for the inclusion of women in the labor market as well as the shift from a male bread winner model to a dual bread winner model (Hernes, 1987; Lister, 2009; Lundqvist, 2017). In this paper we problematize the relationship between activation and gender equality as an under- examined phenomenon. We do so by using institutional logics as theoretical constructs that display the organizing principles for an institutional ﬁeld through competing knowledge claims (Friedland & Alford, 1991; Reay & Hinings, 2009; Scott, 2008). Activation and gender equality are competing logics in the ﬁeld of labor market programs but are harmonizing in some aspects, for example, when activation is described to be a fruitful way to increase women’s employment. This can be seen in policy documents in the European Union (Jenson, 2015; Midtbøen & Teigen, 2014), United States (Morgen et al., 2013; Soss et al., 2011) and other Nordic countries (Hansen, 2018; Lister, 2009; Lundqvist, 2017; Martinsson et al., 2016; Midtbøen & Teigen, 2014). However, the push for activation as a means to solve gender inequalities is not friction free. In policy documents, women are categorized as ungendered workers, mothers, migrants or otherwise victimized and thus proclaimed to be in need of any form of employment rather than quality employment. This catego- rization of women’s employment risks reinforcing unequal gender structures in the labor market and society as a whole (Jenson, 2015; Mulinari, 2018). As such, we argue that the knowledge claim for employment as a means to ensure women’s liberation needs to be problematized. In other words, gender equality in the ﬁeld of activation risks becoming a numerical issue rather than an issue of equalizing power between men and women where inequities in the quality of work and the gender contract itself are no longer an issue (see also Fahlgren, 2013; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). From a policy perspective, Sweden makes broad claims of gender equality while maintaining a horizontally and vertically gender segregated labor market, which has been criticized by United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) (Government ofﬁces of Sweden, 2016). In this perspective, labor market participation may be a path towards increased equality for individual women living in poverty, where employment can provide economic freedom, while structural levels of gender inequality are maintained. The latest ofﬁcial statistics for the thirty largest occupations in Sweden show that in 2018, only four occupations have an equal gender distribution. The most female-dominated occupation was preschool teachers (96% women, 4% men). The most male-dominated occupation was carpenters (1% women, 99% men) (Statistics Sweden, 2020). Furthermore, the gender pay gap has been more or less constant in Sweden over the past three decades (Angelov et al., 2013). In 2019, the Swedish gender pay gap was 9.9 percent according to ofﬁcial statistics (Swedish National Mediation Ofﬁce, 2020). The Nordic welfare state model, with high social security, is based on high labor market participation and systems that protect citizens from income lost due to, for example, unemployment through a public social insurance system (Edebalk & Olsson, 2010). Thus, universal claims of the Nordic model are not applicable for women to the same degree as men, when women on a structural level are paid less and receive social security beneﬁts to a larger extent than men (Martinsson et al., 2016; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). Parsland and Ulmestig 281 This issue is even more evident when it comes to marginalized groups such as international migrant women who not only face a gender segregated labor market but also racial discrimination (Bursell, 2012; Knocke, 2001; Vernby & Dancygier, 2018; Wolgast et al., 2018). However, while gender equality may be institutionalized in Swedish policy as a tool to enable women to combine work and family life, the dominant feminist discourse in Sweden has failed to highlight the unequal relations between subgroups of women (Hussénius, 2019; Martinsson et al., 2016). Constructing the Swedish identity as a progressive feminist nation implies a projection of foreign countries as traditional and gender unequal (Vesterberg, 2015). Thus, international migrants (mainly non-European migrants) are also inﬂicted with this projection, causing a binary between being ‘Swedish’ or ‘other’ (Vesterberg, 2015). Speciﬁcally through labor market policy, migrant women are targeted as victims of their own culture (Mulinari, 2018; Wright Nielsen, 2009). Furthermore, the unemployment of migrant women is not only described in labor market policy as a problem for individual women, but also a challenge for gender equality more broadly (Mulinari, 2018). In social work research, Eliassi (2015, 2017) has shown how the categorization of clients as ‘immigrants’ or ‘Muslim’ is connected to Swedish social workers’ perception of the client as gender-traditional. Furthermore, perceived cultural differences are central in how social workers frame, assess and formulate interventions for clients. When analyzing gender equality, it is thus crucial to not only consider how individual experiences are connected to gender, but rather how gender inequality intersects with other inequalities that individuals experience simultaneously, which create complex processes of discrimination (Acker, 2011; Collins, 2000; Crenshaw, 1991; Mehrotra, 2010). In light of the intersectional dimensions of activation and gender inequality, this study exam- ines how goals of activation and gender equality interact in labor market programs directed towards activating unemployed participants, including migrant women. Little focus has been given to how the logics of activation and gender equality compete on an organizational level in public labor market programs. In this article, our empirical setting is municipal labor market pro- grams, which are typically targeted to poor, unemployed individuals with little to no attachment to the labor market or social insurance system. A labor market program, as described by Lødemel and Moreira (2014), consists of services that offer a set of speciﬁc activation options and have a speciﬁc set of formal conditions and sanctions. Also, according to previous research, if the program targets migrant participants, gender equality is a frequent issue addressed in policy doc- uments for labor market programs since gender equality is connected to the idea of learning to be Swedish (Larsson, 2015; Vesterberg, 2015). Given this context, this study aims to understand how goals of activation and gender equality interact in labor market programs directed towards acti- vating unemployed participants. How are activation and gender equality given meaning in the descriptions of managers and staff in four labor market programs? And how in turn are these meanings applied differentially to international migrant women on the basis of migration and race? The Logics of Gender Equality and Activation Institutions, from a sociological point of view, are the formal and informal rules, norms, procedures and symbolical systems that govern everyday life and guide human behavior (March & Olsen, 1989). Mainstream neo-institutionalists have been criticized for failing to take gender into account when studying institutions (see Krook & Mackay, 2011; Popescu Ljungholm, 2017). As argued by feminist institutionalists, institutions are heavily permeated by gender (Popescu Ljungholm, 2017). For example, gendered norms regarding the distribution of paid and unpaid work inﬂuence one’s position in the labor market and in the social security system (Cf. Acker, 2009; Kullberg, 2004; Morgen et al., 2013; Nybom, 2013). 282 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) However, only taking gender into account is not sufﬁcient in an analysis regarding gender inequalities, as the experiences of individuals is not only connected to gender (Mehrotra, 2010). Different inequalities are intertwined with each other, creating complex processes of discrimination, exclusion and difference making (Acker, 2011; Collins, 2000; Crenshaw, 1991). Race and racism, much like gender and gender inequality, takes different shapes based on context. In Sweden, the dis- course regarding racism and xenophobia have historically been vague and imprecise, as categories of culture and ethnicity are more often used in ofﬁcial statistics and research, rather than speaking of race (Vesterberg, 2015). This practice is however challenged by post-colonial researchers as prob- lematic (see Hübinette et al., 2012; Hübinette & Lundström, 2014; Larsson, 2015; Mulinari, 2018). It is necessary to speak of racism, and thus race, since a vast number of the Swedish popula- tion are being discriminated against and systematically separated from what is known as ‘Swedish’ based on their non-white bodies (Hübinette et al., 2012; Larsson, 2015). These processes of racial- ization create a hierarchal structure of ‘us’ and ‘them’ that is institutional and systemic. The racial- ization processes are created and reproduced in the meeting between individuals, both consciously and unconsciously (Larsson, 2015). We seek to capture racialization processes that are targeted towards unemployed individuals that especially distinguishes migrant women as a racially-charged construct. We use the category of migrants to apprehend the activation of a very heterogeneous group of individuals who have migrated to Sweden, in terms of country of origin, race and lived experi- ences. International migrants are of particular interest for Swedish labor market policy, where spe- ciﬁc activation measures and policies target migrants. In national labour market policy have international migrants been separated from other unemployed individuals since 2010, through the establishment reform. Through the reform speciﬁc activation measures, beneﬁts and demands on unemployed migrants was created that efﬁciently have separated unemployed migrants from other unemployed (Larsson, 2015). This targeting of migrants is often done in ways that risk feeding racist institutions in society and reproducing racial hierarchies through racialization processes (Mulinari, 2018; Sager & Mulinari, 2018; Vesterberg, 2015). In our study, structures and experiences connected to race and/or class seem to relate to how gender equality and activation is given meaning in the labor market programs. Class permeates the labour market programs since they solely target unemployed individuals living on social assis- tance, meaning poor people who are not established in the social insurance system. As discussed by Hübinette and Lundström (2014); Sager and Mulinari (2018), Mulinari (2018), gender equality policy in Sweden is connected to a sense of national identity that excludes migrants from the very notion of gender equality, as they are constructed to be patriarchal and not interested in change. Thus, by adopting an intersectional approach in our study, we highlight how activation may differ for migrant women. We do so by using intersectionality as a heuristic principle in our institutional analysis of our material (Acker, 2011). The framework of intersectionality reminds us that intercon- nected systems of inequality operate on multiple levels in which they affect marginalized groups in society, and hence needs to be represented in the analysis of our material (Mehrotra, 2010). Institutional logics offers support in studying the intersectional impacts of societal-level knowl- edge on the behavior and cognition of actors, such as organizations and individuals (Thornton et al., 2005). As such, logics are much like discourses, i.e. theoretical constructs that help display the governing through institutionalized taken-for-granted knowledge claims (Alford & Friedland, 1985; Friedland & Alford, 1991). Institutional logics, to a higher degree than discourses, considers the role of actors and subjects in the way power forms persist and change. Institutions are contradic- tory by nature. Logics as knowledge claims become a way for actors to handle conﬂicts within the institutions as well as implement change; logics thus provide a link between institutions and action (Friedland & Alford, 1991; Reay & Hinings, 2009). Individuals and organizations can manipulate and elaborate knowledge claims, and knowledge can thus become more harmonized and well- incorporated and easier for individuals and organizations to process (see Friedland & Alford, Parsland and Ulmestig 283 1991). Knowledge governs what is considered legitimate in the ﬁeld and thus affects the way differ- ent organizations act (Dequech, 2008; Suddaby & Greenwood, 2005). The actors in this study, social workers and managers, thus have some degree of discretion in how they work and use knowledge claims, although this is embedded in a normatively and cognitively controlled context, i.e. labor market programs (see Friedland & Alford, 1991). To capture how knowledge is handled and understood by the social workers and managers, we use the concepts of symbols, rituals and hybrids with regard to the concept of competitive institutional logics. Symbols are essential for institutional logics since they create meaning for the actors and through that maintain the logics in an institutionalized ﬁeld (Friedland & Alford, 1991). Symbols are manifested through written and spoken language, for example, through organizational goals that can provide both legitimacy and a taken-for-granted truth (Friedland & Alford, 1991). Logics are concretized through ritualized behaviors in accordance with knowledge within the logic. For instance, the monitoring of the participants, including migrant women, within the labor market pro- grams is a ritualized behavior. As such, the logics can be analytically explored by extracting the sym- bolic and ritualized practices conducted in an institutional ﬁeld. In labor market programs as an institutionalized ﬁeld, several knowledge claims exist and compete for power on the ﬁeld, as one logic is dominant and others are subordinate (Reay & Hinings, 2009). Rituals and symbols maintain the logics and thus deﬁne and legitimize these logics, but they also serve to limit or increase the scope of the institutionalized ﬁeld (see Tan & Wang, 2011). The organizational quest for legitimacy comes with the risk that there will be a loose connection between symbols and rituals within the logic on one side, and what the social workers aim to do on the other side. Meaning that there is a loose connection between the practical work of social workers and what the organization symbolizes. To minimize competition, logics can also collectively create a hybrid logic (Glynn & Lounsbury, 2005; Thornton et al., 2005). In our analysis, we use two logics based on a literature review as we aim to create a greater understanding of activation and gender equality in labor market programs between women and men as well as among subgroups of women. Activation Logic Activation, inspired by Hvinden (1999) and Jones (2012), is deﬁned as a policy where the formal aim is to assist a target group in entering or re-entering the labor market and includes formal conditions and sanctions. Among policymakers in the global North, activation has become a success story in ﬁghting unemployment and poverty (Clasen et al., 2016; Gerﬁn & Lechner, 2002; Herbst & Benjamin, 2016). However, activation within labor market programs has also been criticized for being mainly symbolic to show political strength due to a lack of proven positive effects (Clasen et al., 2016; Raffass, 2017; Rueda, 2015). The idea of keeping the unemployed active is not such a new concept in the Swedish welfare state as it is in many other states, where the “work-ﬁrst approach” (in Swedish; Arbetslinjen) has been a part of labor market policy for many decades (See Salonen, 1993; Thorén, 2008). The work-ﬁrst concept has changed somewhat over the years, but in the context of municipal labor market policy, it is a symbol of the duty to work to support yourself and become ﬁnancially self-sufﬁcient (Thorén, 2008). Activation, and labor market pro- grams by extension, contains rituals to maintain the work-ﬁrst approach. Thus, promoting discipline to the unemployed can be seen as a part of the activation process, making them more motivated to enter or re-enter the labor market (see Jacobsson et al., 2017; Lødemel & Moreira, 2014). Another shared aspect of the Nordic Welfare states is the dual character of their labor market policies (Lødemel, 1997; Ulmestig & Marston, 2015). One national labor market policy is implemented through the Swedish Public Employment Service, mainly for estab- lished workers. Those with access to unemployment insurance and other social insurance solutions receive beneﬁts that depend on the public social insurance scheme. The other side of the dual welfare 284 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) system is the municipal labor market policy, which mainly serves poor people who are not estab- lished in the social insurance system and are thus dependent on the means-tested assistance system. The welfare system institutionalizes this dual character and also maintains the gendered hier- archy of paid and unpaid work, where it is mainly women who need to establish themselves on the labor market to become ﬁnancially independent through pension schemes and the possibility to receive sickness beneﬁts, maternity leave and other welfare beneﬁts (see Mulinari, 2018). The four municipal labor programs we study here are characterized by interagency cooperation, professional staff for individual services, inclusion of market logics and decentralization/new ways of governance (see Jessen & Tufte, 2014; Lødemel & Moreira, 2014). The social workers in the pro- grams often have an educational background and the skills needed to support people to make behav- ioral changes and transform the way they relate to the labor market. The programs work closely with the Swedish Public Employment Service as they subsidize constructed work for the unemployed par- ticipants in the programs, as the work does not compete with regular employees’ work tasks (see Calmfors et al., 2002; Mulinari, 2018). The labor market programs are administered through a joint organization that is managed by a board of local politicians. The managers work quite indepen- dently in relation to the over-arching organization. Both the managers as well as the social workers have strong discretionary powers but are set to follow the local political goals set by the board of the labor market organization. Examples of the local activation goals that govern the labor market pro- grams are: � Women and men in the [municipality name] provide for themselves and have sustainable employment � Women and men from 16–29 years of age either study or work � The Board’s measures contribute to providing employers with access to requested skills The local activation goals given as examples are not about what the programs do. Instead, the goals are aimed towards what the participants will become through the programs and thus serve as exam- ples of the disciplinary nuances of activation. Gender Equality Logic Gender equality, according to the CEDAW deﬁnition, means that states will ensure that men and women have the same rights. As such, gender equality concerns equalizing power between men and women. Within the ﬁeld of labor market policy, gender equality has mainly been focused on gen- dered differences in the labor market in a variety of ways (Gornick, 1999). Here, our main focus is the gendered differences in occupation, as horizontal and vertical gender segregation in the labor market has been an ongoing concern in Sweden and is linked to women’s economic liberation from both family and government (Angelov et al., 2013; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). In the country’s elaboration of the work-ﬁrst approach, Sweden’s national gender equality policies have been evolving since the middle of the 20th century. Gender equality was, and still is, an impor- tant symbol of high labor force participation as well as the idea of the universal welfare state (Lundqvist, 2017). Moreover, gender equality is an important symbol for Sweden, representing state feminism through gender mainstreaming where all national proposals and policies include a gender equality analysis and all public statistics are gender segregated (Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). However, the gender mainstreaming approach has also been criticized for its quest to neutral- ize the power differences between men and women. When the primary focus is making individual women equal to individual men rather than the relationship between women and men (Crespi, 2009). Also for approaches that equate to a gender-blind practice in policy outcomes by assuming that men and women are affected by policies in the same way (Vincent & Eveline, 2010). Parsland and Ulmestig 285 While the strategy of gender mainstreaming emphasizes gender equality on a policy level, research on gender mainstreaming practice in Swedish social work and labor market efforts has shown how gendered differentiation is reinforced as social workers tend to focus more effort on women’s involvement in family life rather than working life (Hussénius, 2019; Kullberg, 2004; Nybom, 2013). When speciﬁc measures are taken to activate women towards the labor market, it has been shown that gender segregation in the labor market is also reinforced as women are pushed towards traditional female professions such as child care or service-professions, especially when it comes to migrant women (Mulinari, 2018; Wright Nielsen, 2009). Examples on local gender equality goals are: � The Board expands and develops efforts to reach women with a weak position in the labor market […] Newly arrived women and women with a lower level of education are prioritized. � Employees, both women and men, have good and equal working conditions and an equal and sustainable work environment. � The activities of the Board have the prerequisites for working with gender mainstreaming and directed measures to increase gender equality. In contrast to the activation goals, that permeates the practical activation of the unemployed individ- uals, the gender equality goals is placed on an organizational level. The goals of gender equality, through a variety of measurements throughout the organizations is to increase gender equality. However, with little attachment to the day-to-day work within the labour market programs. Our literature review reveals a gap in previous research concerning how two strong institutional logics in the Swedish welfare state, activation and gender equality, interact. Especially within the frames of labour market programs where the logics have strong legitimate knowledge claims through ritualization and symbolization. Even more so, the gap contains a lack of knowledge regard- ing how migration and race intersects with the two logics and can thus be applied differently on migrant women. Methods The empirical data for this article is based on semi-structured interviews with 28 social workers and managers at four labor market programs within the same municipality in Sweden, hence following the same municipal goals of activation and gender equality. The concept behind these labor market programs is that participants will be hired within the municipality at wages that are subsidized by the state and municipality for a designated period of time, where they will also be assigned a job coach. There are differences between the programs concerning the support and target groups, as described in the Table 1 below. We made contact with the four managers of the programs for individual interviews and through them recruited a total of 24 social workers for group interviews. The semi-structured (Gubrium et al., 2012) interview guide was focused on professional perceptions regarding political goals and day-to-day work with unemployed participants. No demographic information regarding the inter- viewees was collected. We had no knowledge or relation to the four labor market programs prior to the study. The one researcher who did the interviews have practical knowledge of working as a social worker within the ﬁeld of municipal labor market program and social assistance, and thus had a reference frame that in some aspects could be shared with the interviewees and shape how questions were asked or how follow-up questions were formulated. We carried out the analysis through a reﬂective dialogue in several steps, focusing on available research, theory and interviews, where several contradictory results and different perspectives 286 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) Table 1. Overview of Labor Market Programs. Program Target group Support Activation Youths, 16-29 years old. Mix of collective and individual support, emphasis on program W motivational work, coaching towards education and employment, developing CV, employed outside of program. Activation Unemployed who get ﬁnancial aid Collective support, little motivation work, coaching program X from the municipality. Over mainly towards employment, developing CV, 25 years old. employed outside of program. Activation Unemployed who get ﬁnancial aid Collective support, little motivational work, program Y from the municipality. Over emphasis on coaching, coaching towards 25 years old. education and employment, developing CV, in-house employment. Activation Socially and criminally charged youths, Individual support, emphasis on motivational work, program Z 18-29 years old. coaching towards education and employment, developing CV, in-house employment. emerged (see Alvesson & Kärreman, 2007; Alvesson & Sköldberg, 2008). This approach meant that the answers given in the interviews can be compared to larger social issues about activation and gender equality. The analysis of the material is based on thematic analysis where we sorted the mate- rial into categories and themes. First, we sorted the material into descriptive categories. Second, we performed a more selective reading where we coded items based on theory and available research, where the material is ﬁrst entered under different themes and then written up as an analytical draft that includes theoretical concepts (see Bazely, 2009). Third, where patterns relevant to how activa- tion and gender equality are given meaning in the descriptions of managers and staff, these were interlinked with quotes. Fourth, a last check of the analysis was made between the aim and research questions and our results. In this last round no themes dispersed nor were new ones formulated. This abductive process (Alvesson & Kärreman, 2007) generated an overview of the empirical material, and the relationships between the themes could ultimately be met with the theoretical analysis, which led to the overarching themes presented here, and thus the main analysis. This study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board in Uppsala (Reg. no. 2016/173). All respondents in the interviews were informed about the study and that participation was voluntary and have given informed consent. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and stored securely. Results and Analysis To understand how goals of activation and gender equality interact and give meaning in the inter- views, our results and analysis are presented through three logics: the activation logic, the gender equality logic and the hybrid logic of gendered activation. Each logic contains symbols and rituals that maintain the logics as theoretical constructs. What distinguishes the hybrid logic of gen- dered activation is how international migrant women becomes a powerful symbol that upholds and legitimizes the logic. Activation as the Dominant Logic The activation logic is maintained by two symbols. Symbols, as a theoretical concept, are manifested through language and are essential for creating meaning for actors to maintain the logics (Friedland & Parsland and Ulmestig 287 Alford, 1991). As we will show, the symbols are, much like the local activation goals, permeated by a focus on the actions of the unemployed participants rather than the measures of the labor market pro- grams. The ﬁrst symbol is self-sufﬁciency. The social workers interviewed held the goals regarding activation towards self-sufﬁciency in high regard. As one social worker said: “[…] that more people should be self-sufﬁcient in either work or studies. This is probably the foremost policy goal we are pursuing” (SW2W). This sentiment was also expressed by a social worker who was asked what the main political goal for the labor market program is. “Well, it is in line with the work-ﬁrst approach, which is quite apparent. So, you could say that it [the labor market program] is part of the work-ﬁrst approach, I would say. Although it is not explicitly stated, it is” (SW4Z). Acting in accordance with the activation goals seemed to be taken as a given: “The mission is to get them out in some sort of self-sufﬁciency” (SW2Z). Self-sufﬁciency becomes a powerful symbol for the knowledge claim that activation leads to employment, and through that, activation can be understood as a dominant logic that is pri- oritized in the labor market programs (see Friedland & Alford, 1991). Activation is taken for granted as effective, but the staff and managers also choose to prioritize it to a certain degree. The activation goals are closely governed through the ritual of measuring outcomes for the participants: We have a lot of goals, but we have a speciﬁc goal that is stated in the operational plan and that is that 40% [of participants] will go on to work or study, and so that is our numbered goal. That is a pretty high number, 40%, but we are quite close (SW1X). The results from the ritual, expressed as numbers and percentages, become powerful symbols of a job well done: “Yes, we do good things, we have good results […] between 60–70% go on to work and study” (SW4W). Symbols are essential for institutional logics since they create meaning for the actors within the institutionalized ﬁeld (Friedland & Alford, 1991). Symbols carry knowledge claims through place and time, much like the organizational goals do in the four labor market programs when they emphasize that a certain percentage of individuals will become employed (see Meyer, 2008; Tan & Wang, 2011). As these results illustrate, the organizational activation goals have taken hold of the labor market programs, where the ritual of measuring labor market outcomes not only governs the participants, but also the social workers and managers. It is worth noting that there is no similar emphasis from social workers, managers or organizational leadership concern- ing whether the programs meet the goals of gender equality. The second symbol of activation logic is activity, which is closely linked to motivation. Activity becomes a ritual for the participants to prove to the social workers that they are motivated to ﬁnd work: “It’s about getting the motor running, right? This is arranged employment. Then when you [social workers] come in, you help them obviously, but you have to get your own motor running to look for jobs” (SW1X). This illustrates how the social workers perceive the participants to be unmotivated before they arrive to the program. The social workers monitor the participants to see that they are keeping active; as one social worker described: “We see how they work, if they come late and manage time” (SW1Y). The monitoring described in the quote often has a function when activating the unemployed in a way that enhances motivation to activity, enforcing the logic of activation (see Thorén, 2012). The logic of activation is manifested as dominant in the ritualized work within the labor market programs through the rituals and symbols of activation (see Alford & Friedland, 1985; Friedland & Alford, 1991). However, the symbol of activity does not give rise to rituals that accept any kind of activity. Instead, social workers see CV development, applying for jobs and individual coaching as well as guidance towards other welfare-support, as symbols of individual motivation: “But as I said, the main opportunity and chance is an individual match in the labor market” (SW4X). Acting in 288 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) accordance with the activation logic is the individuals’ best chance to become employed. On the other hand, institutions do more than control and constrain, they also empower the behaviour of actors (Scott, 2008). For an instance, one social worker described how a personal goal is consistent with the activation logic; “[…] well, that is my goal. To get as many people out [self-sufﬁcient] as possible, to help both the individual and the community.” (SW 2Y). The personal goal illustrates how actors, through their behaviour and their adherence to norms, embody institutional logics (see Friedland & Alford, 1991). In this sense, activation is clear-cut in terms of how and why participants should be handled. Activation as an institutional logic, manifested through symbols and rituals in the interviewees’ daily work, becomes a dominant truth that guides the actions of social workers and managers within the labor market programs. In what follows, we show how it is hard for a gender equality logic to compete with this dominant logic of activation. Gender Equality as the Subordinate Logic The gender equality logic is maintained by three symbols and is understood as a subordinate logic within the four labor market programs. The ﬁrst symbol was the loose coupling between the orga- nizational goals and the rituals and symbols in the daily work. This means that there is a discrep- ancy between the organization-oriented goals of gender equality and how the social workers and managers describe what they do (Meyer & Rowan, 1977). There is a lack of awareness of gender equality goals among the interviewees. In two of the labor market programs studied, it is unclear if goals of gender equality are a part of the organizational goals, making the goals fuzzy. Furthermore, there is a discrepancy between managers and social workers within the same program. When asked if goals of gender equality govern the program, one manager stated “No, not here” (MZ), while the staff in the same program described how they did in fact work with goals related to gender equality. In another program, the tables were turned. Here, the manager gave explicit details on how gender equality goals were being pursued, while the staff said “no, not here anyway” (SW1X) and “No, not in this team” (SW2X). This illustrates an aspect of the logic of gender equality as a fuzzy logic that is not prioritized in day-to-day work, an aspect that is common in the critique of gender mainstreaming where the focus is on outlining policy goals with little emphasis given to how the policy goals should actually be implemented (Crespi, 2009). The loose coupling was ritualized by a gender-neutral approach that maintained the symbol, such as giving the same service independent of gender and emphasizing individuality, which risked becoming a gender-blind practice. As one social worker described when asked if they worked with particularly vulnerable women by referencing the organizational goals: “[…] we work so actively with everyone so we don’t have to distinguish between men or women, we spend the same time with everyone” (SW2Y). The quote highlights how the gender-neutral approach is ritual- ized within the programs by focusing on individual participants. Furthermore, the gender-neutral approach also risks becoming gender-blind when it assumes that policy outcomes, such as activation, affect men and women the same way and should thus be seen as a gender-equal practice since gender- neutrality is sought (see Crespi, 2009; Vincent & Eveline, 2010). One of the managers acknowledged the complexity of working with a gender-neutral approach and described gender inequality inherent in the service provided to participants: Two-thirds [of participants] are women. But then we have the same problem as everyone else has, we have more women, but we spend more time and … yes more time and money on the men. But that’s the way it is all over. But we are just as bad, unfortunately. But we are working on it. We can see it in the statistics (MX). Parsland and Ulmestig 289 The quote shows how gender equality goals, as a symbol, are loosely coupled to the behaviours and norms within the programs but are not completely invisible, as the managers have chosen to produce statistics on the matter. The interviewees described how gender equality can mean a variety of different things, making the gender equality goals themselves fuzzy and difﬁcult to grasp. The second symbol was that gender equality is a societal issue, which most of the interviewees acknowledged but which also became a bit too abstract to address. For example, in issues relating to the gender segregated labor market, one interviewee noted: “[…] so you have to work … try to get them to make gender norm-breaking choices, broaden perspectives and things like that” (SW5W). This quote from the social worker highlights the fact that the presentation of gender norm- breaking as an option is ritualized, unlike the motivation for activation, which is taken for granted. In other words, the subordinate gender logic is handled as an option. While the knowledge claim of breaking gendered norms is noticeable in the quote, an emphasis is placed on individual choice in doing so. This emphasis on individual choice reoccurs in another quote regarding how gender norm- breaking choices are handled within the programs: […] I think that I personally am not trying to change, but I can inform about what is feasible in society. That you can think what you want but this is the way it is and if you go outside, it can have consequences. I don’t feel like I’m going to change things. I will inform, not change (SW1Z). In the quote, information, rather than change, highlights how the gender equality logic is an option when presented to the participants in the programs. In contrast to the motivation to be active, the par- ticipants have a choice to make gender norm-breaking choices in the labor market, reinforcing the understanding that gender equality logic is a subordinate rather than dominant logic. The third symbol was related to the gender equality perspective as a policy tool, given how the programs reported statistics back to their main administration. A manager described it as follows: We must have the gender equality perspective. It should permeate all of our statistics, and that is what I mean; there are no such ﬁgure targets for a certain number to be enrolled [within the program], but it is more that … more that the gender equality perspective should permeate all statistics, analyses and reports in the operational plan (MY). As the quote shows, unlike activation, gender equality is not measured through statistics, where participant enrolment and program outcomes are measured. Instead, gender-divided statistics are fol- lowed by a gender equality analysis of said statistics, as part of the idea of gender mainstreaming (Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). The gender-divided statistics are non-selectable, but the gender equality analysis seems to have little impact on how the labor market programs are organized or how the activation should be conducted, since there are no compulsory practices for the analysis and the organization of the programs. Hence, there is nothing to ritualize gender equality goals, such as a policy tool that can serve as a signal to decision makers and society as a whole that gender equality is on the agenda. However, this kind of symbolic window dressing does not have to imply the subordination of an institutionalized logic (see Meyer, 2008). Promoting gender equality is interlinked with the Swedish welfare model (Lundqvist, 2017; Martinsson et al., 2016; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). The knowledge claim of a need for gender equality affects what is considered legitimate in the ﬁeld and thus shapes how different organizations act (Dequech, 2008; Suddaby & Greenwood, 2005). The interviews highlight how gender equality goals may be manifested on a societal level but are still subordinate within the labor market programs. As illustrated in the above analysis, the gender equality logic is largely subordinate in relation to the activation logic. We highlight this fact by showing the loose coupling of the organizational gender equality goals in relation to the actions of the social workers and managers. However, the 290 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) two competing logics can also be understood as a hybrid logic (see Reay & Hinings, 2009). In what follows, we illustrate a way to handle both gender equality and activation without creating compe- tition between them. Gendered Activation, a Hybrid Logic that Makes Gender Equality and Activation Non-competitive A convenient way for organizations and their members to manage competing logics is to harmonize these logics or make them ﬁt into one another (see Friedland & Alford, 1991). Theoretically, this can be understood as a hybrid logic where the logic of gender equality is absorbed into activation logic (see Reay & Hinings, 2009). By creating a hybrid logic, the four programs can maintain the knowl- edge claims of activation while supplementing the symbols and knowledge claims of the gender equality logic that provides legitimacy in relation to other actors within the ﬁeld of labor market pro- grams. Here, we present this as three symbols that maintain the hybrid logic of gendered activation. First, paid labor becomes a symbol that enables the hybridization of the gender equality logic and activation, as paid labor is seen as both a possibility for unemployed women to achieve equality and as a goal for activation in itself. It is common that the social workers’ and managers’ reﬂections on gender equality was something mainly made through the labor market. As one manager described: […] We see having work as being equal. Because then you have the power to decide over your life. That is what gender equality is all about. That you have the power to decide how you want to live and what you want to do with your life (MX). The quote coincides with the feminist critique of the welfare state, where work as a commodity is applied exclusively for workers. As such, labor gender equality may be achieved by taking part in paid work (see Sainsbury, 1999). However, this notion does not take into account the gendered dif- ferences in the quality of work, wages and working conditions (Gornick, 1999; Jenson, 2015; Rafnsdóttir & Weight, 2018) nor the unequal division of unpaid labor (Gornick, 1999; Lister, 2009). The symbol of paid labor connects activation and gender equality through the ritualization of spe- ciﬁc measures in activating women. The ritual of activating women was described by a manager as an organizational decision to have a 50/50 balance of women and men as participants and as staff: “So, I felt that I had a little to work with, as a feminist,” since the decision would mean more women being activated towards the labor market. Another labor market program was split into two interventions, one designed for men and one for women, as a way to attract more women to the program: “[…] but the girls do not come here. So therefore … okay what does that mean? Should we start only for girls? Then maybe it will happen. And it did” (MZ). In the male dominated intervention, the participants were employed to do light carpentry and thus, a way for the program to attract more female partic- ipants was to start a catering business that speciﬁcally targeted women, hence following the gender- stereotypical labor market. From the perspective that paid labor is a means to achieve gender equal- ity, the opportunity for women to partake in work as a commodity is increased in the programs even when they follow the structures of the gender-segregated labor market. At the same time, however, the structures of the gender-segregated labor market were actively reproduced in the way the labor market programs were designed for men and women. Further, the gendered reproduction of class was manifested in the training of lower class or working-class women to become childcare workers and men to work as carpenters (cf. Skeggs, 2004). The second symbol was how responsibility for gender equality was placed upon the individual participant rather than the labor market programs. The segregated labor market was discussed by a social worker as follows: Parsland and Ulmestig 291 Generally, I think it’s a huge question. So how should we look at it? In general, there is, of course, a greater issue in breaking structures and changing norms. But is it people who are far from the labor market and who should be in the forefront of it? […] From a gender equality perspective … it is awesome and we all need to help break structures and norms, but if it is a young person for whom it will be a ﬁrst job, or who has not worked for several years, they are the ones who will work at a pre- school … if it is a woman, for example, where she feels conﬁdent and that she feels that she can handle it. Or should she be a janitor? Or … how are we going to look at it? The greater purpose is to enter the labor market, gain a stronger position and become self-sufﬁcient (SW2W). The quote highlights the conﬂict of handling structural issues, such as the gender segregated labor market, with individualized activation. This shows how the responsibility for gender equality in the programs is maintained as a symbol of individual responsibility in the logic of gendered activation. This symbol is also maintained through rituals. The female participants were mainly employed within childcare and other types of care work, while the men were mainly employed as janitors, woodworkers and gardeners. One manager described this as a result of individual choice by the par- ticipants: “But it is also the case that the places we have available are in school kitchens and pre- schools, where women want to be. The men want to become janitors and such” (MX). The quote poses a chicken and an egg situation: is gendered employment provided because of the choice of the participants, or are the participants choosing certain employment because that is what is pro- vided? In either case, there is an emphasis on the individual responsibility of making a choice by following structural norms and social attitudes, or not (Gornick, 1999). While the idea of breaking problematic gendered norms and structures in society may be inherent within the programs, the gen- dered choice of participants becomes a ritual where participants are described as wanting to take gender stereotypical employment and are therefore supported in such choices. The logic of gendered activation is thus dominated by knowledge claims from activation. Some social workers and managers, however, described rituals for how they try to present gender norm breaking choices to participants: “[…] to present different [jobs] and to get some nuance to it as well. So, it’s not so traditional, women should work in preschool and men should work as janitors you know” (SW9W). The quote shows how symbols of gender equality are kept within the gendered activation, which affects the programs. But the quote also highlights how gender stereotypical choices are the responsibility of the participants when the social workers’ and managers’ rituals do not work. As a manager describes, “We work according to the mantra if they don’t want to, then there is no point in trying” (MW). Trying to inﬂuence non-traditional choices becomes a ritual that maintains the logic. What the participants actually choose does not really matter, it is still a symbol of gender equality that an attempt is made, which legitimatizes the program (Tan & Wang, 2011). Women with a background as international migrants were the third symbol. Participants from this heterogeneous group become the perfect target for gendered activation and overall reduced by the social workers to a category that symbolizes the need for gender equality and activation. Friedland and Alford (1991) describe that categories are important knowledge claims for the state to maintain power and legitimacy. Through the metaphor of a country at war, they describe how the construction of “us and them” is almost as important as the actual conquest because it is the con- struction of the enemy that causes the citizens to ﬁght for their country based on how the enemy is portrayed. In our data, the “migrant woman” is a constructed category that manifests the legitimacy for activation in itself, but also as a means to solve gender inequalities. The legitimacy that gendered activation enjoys through the activation of migrant women can be noted in a quote from a social worker in one of the labor market programs. When explaining an obsta- cle in activating migrant women, the interviewee focused on cases when the women are expected to work together with men: 292 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) You know, women from other countries. They are not like the Swedes who dare to say, dare to talk. In [their] family, women are sitting in one room and the man in another room, you know? Women never meet the man like this, go out with them and so on. I remember my ﬁrst year here, a girl asked ‘what should I go out and work with a man?’ I said ‘of course you should do it but you do not go hand in hand you work like this.’ But now they dare to say things and so on (SW3Y). The quote from the social worker highlights an example of putting cultural explanations on social problems, when the unemployment of migrant women is sweepingly understood to be interlinked with the resistance to work alongside a man. However, the quote also highlights the signiﬁcance of migrant women being a symbol for gendered activation, as the construction of the migrant women becomes a dichotomized category to being Swedish, and thus in need of an intervention that can ‘solve’ both unemployment as gender inequalities, hence gendered activation. This notion also connects to how gender equality is seen to be part of Swedish national identity and the image of migrants being inherently patriarchal and lacking interest of gender equality (Hübinette & Lundström, 2014). Gender equality claims become ampliﬁed in relation to helping migrant women who are exposed in the labor market and who are at the same time described as victims of a gender unequal culture. In this way, migrant women thus become a symbol for the hybrid logic of gendered activation. As previous research has pointed out (Larsson, 2015; Martinsson et al., 2016; Mulinari, 2018; Vesterberg, 2016), there is often a paradoxical discourse around migrant women in Swedish labor market policy. On one side, migrant women are victimized and described as exposed due to discrimination: it is like this; many people think when they see the [municipal] website that diversity is a nice thing … but when we come with our Somali women who not only have a hijab but a chador and then it’s ‘nooo … we don’t want that kind of diversity’ (MX). Migrant women are also victimized in relation to the knowledge claim that they are from tradi- tional and unequal cultures, as a manager describes when discussing Somali women: But then it is also that they have a lot of children, that it is very common that they have 5 to 15 children, and then that is what their calling is in life, maybe, and then maybe you never had the idea that you should go out into the labor market because it is not your role, and then it makes it difﬁcult to get out when you have so many [children] too (MY). In contrast to the ﬁndings of Wright Nielsen (2009), Larsson (2015) and Vesterberg (2016), where the victimization of migrant women is interlinked to culture, our ﬁndings show a type of victimiza- tion that is also interlinked to societal dimensions of labor market discrimination. However, the end result still largely matches the ﬁndings of previous research, namely that the gendered activation of migrant women is intended to make them responsible for supporting themselves. This is the other side of the paradoxical discourse around migrant women in Swedish labor market policy: So to say … that you see the family as the provider, which means that you do not have to work unless you want to, the family sends money from all over the world. So, you do not see your responsibility to the state either (MY). As described in the quote, migrant women are also depicted as unwilling to work and hence in need of activation measures to make them more motivated to work. In such cases, their unwillingness is set in relation to the traditional culture of the migrant women, putting a cultural explanation on the social problem that unemployment is for migrant women (cf. Eliassi, 2017). Parsland and Ulmestig 293 In national labor market policy, the unemployment of migrant women has historically been described as a problem for the women themselves as well as a challenge to gender equality in Sweden (Mulinari, 2018). The image of migrant women as problematic and victims of an unequal and patriarchal culture is part of the racialization processes that upholds institutional racism in society, as it enables separation of migrant women and pushes speciﬁc activation interventions upon them (cf. Larsson, 2015). As such, a push for subsidized employment, much like the programs in this study, is described as a means to activate migrant women and thus uphold national ideals of labor market participation and gender equality. To activate migrant women into subsidized employ- ment is thus a ritual that upholds the logic of gendered activation. This is exempliﬁed in the programs by a quote from a manager: It is about people who have to become a part of the labor market and become integrated as well. Partly for ﬁnancial reasons but especially for themselves and their children. There are so many beneﬁts to integra- tion and getting them into the labor market (MY). The quote from the manager highlights why it is important for the programs to target and activate speciﬁc categories of women, here migrant women. The knowledge claim in the labor market pro- grams is that activation of the migrant women is not only beneﬁcial for the individual women who become temporarily employed and can become more ﬁnancially independent, the migrant woman also become a symbol for a wider issue, where integration is equated with labor market participation. The migrant woman as a symbol for gendered activation sheds light on the unequal relation among sub-groups of women. Gender equality, as shown in our result, is mainly understood as a woman’s issue on a societal level. Gendered activation on the other hand becomes manageable and manifested through the symbolization of the migrant woman. By constructing the migrant woman as an ‘other’ who is a victim of her culture but in the same time responsible for her own and her children’s future, migrant women are singled out as speciﬁcally problematic for Swedish society to handle, thus the need for activation. As such, the symbolization of migrant women is an example of the racialization processes that uphold institutional racism and discrimination. Migrant women thus become a very distinct symbol for the logic of gendered activation in this context. Concluding Discussion This study aims to understand how goals of activation and gender equality interact and how acti- vation and gender equality are given meaning in the descriptions of managers and staff in four labor market programs. However, the study has limitations. One is that there are only four pro- grams, which of course does not provide the possibility to generalize the empirical results. Secondly, we are limited to the descriptions of the individuals whom we interviewed. Furthermore, we did not collect demographic information about the interviewees that could have contextualized the results, as for instance, the results of Eliassi (2017) are contextualized. It should also be noted that the analysis is within the frames of the female-male gender binary. Thus, experiences of individuals living outside the gender-binary are not captured. Still, our study gives empirical examples on the connection between institutions and action (see Friedland & Alford, 1991; Reay & Hinings, 2009) and thus the complexity of doing practical social work within a ﬁeld of competing logics. Neo-institutionalists have been criticized for failing to account for gender (see Krook & Mackay, 2011; Popescu Ljungholm, 2017). Our results show that institutional logics can be used theoretically to show how institutions are steeped in gender norms. 294 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) The goals of gender equality and activation that the labor market programs in the study are asked to follow are given different meanings by the interviewees, where gender equality is fuzzy and hard to grasp and activation is more clear-cut. As shown in the Table 2 below, gendered activation as a hybrid logic becomes a way of handling the fuzzy goals of gender equality together with the more clear-cut activation goals. As the table shows, the logic of gender equality is given meaning through the symbols and rituals connected to an organizational and policy level. The activation logic, on the other hand, carries symbols and rituals targeting the unemployed individuals, which is generally consistent with how the organizational goals are modeled. As such, the goals are understood to interact on different levels in the labor market programs but can come together through the logic of gendered activation, where speciﬁc activation measures directed at women in general, and migrant women more specif- ically, encounter knowledge claims of gender equality. In the programs, women are mainly trained to become service providers in low-status and low-wage work, and the responsibility is ﬁrmly placed on them rather than the structures of the labor market or labor market programs. Women with a migrant background are often targeted for gender equality and activation measures in welfare states (Larsson, 2015; Mulinari, 2018). Gendered activation shifts the focus away from questions of gender segregation and discrimination within the labor market programs in terms of how resources are provided and related to the labor market. There are no reasons to doubt the accuracy of the reports of the managers or the social workers. Their understanding is strongly affected by the societal push for activation as a means to solve gender inequalities (see Mulinari, 2018; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). However, Jenson (2015) and Mulinari (2018) point to the risk of categorizing women as ungendered workers, mothers, migrants or otherwise victimized and thus suitable to any form of employment without taking the quality of employment into consideration. This reproduces a segregated labor market where both women and/ or migrants are often already at a disadvantage. The risk that poor people will be directed to low quality jobs is increased by the dual welfare system in Sweden. To be able to establish yourself in the social insurance system, you need an income, regardless of the risk you put yourself in. In the end, gendered activation contains gender equality but is dominated by activation. Knowledge of gender inequality is used but also legitimizes behavior and ideas (see Dequech, 2008; Suddaby & Greenwood, 2005; Tan & Wang, 2011). The legitimacy connects the programs with ideas of gender equality in the welfare state where policy and organizational goals on gender are acknowledged (Lundqvist, 2017; Martinsson et al., 2016; Mulinari, 2018). Gendered activation sheds light on the ambiguity of Swedish gender equality policy, where gender mainstreaming focuses on organizational measures in terms of gender equality analysis Table 2. Overview of Logics, Symbols and Rituals. Logics Symbols Rituals Gender Equality Loose-coupling Gender neutrality A societal issue Gender norm-breaking choices Policy tool Reporting to policy makers Activation Self-sufﬁciency Measuring outcome for the participants Activity Participants being active Gendered activation Paid labor Speciﬁc measures in activating women Individual responsibility Individual choice Migrant women Activating migrant women into subsidized employment Parsland and Ulmestig 295 and reporting gender segregated statistics, but with little attachment to practical gender equality work (cf. Crespi, 2009; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). Based on our study, we argue that gender equality policies need to be implemented in the day-to-day work within organizations, and not only used as an organizational measurement as it otherwise risks being an empty policy with little attachment to the experiences of individuals within the organization. For example, there is a risk that this kind of “empty” gender equality policy will reproduce a bad quality of work or a bad work-life balance for women, rather than supporting equality. Our results provide a critical analysis of the activation logic that suggests that employment is a universal answer to social problems, such as gender inequal- ity. For social workers who ﬁnd themselves implementing activation policies we argue that it is nec- essary to question what activation policy can mean for individuals as well as society at large, especially as activation tends to target marginalized groups who are already exposed. Furthermore, gendered activation illustrates the existence of a loose connection between the claims for gender equality and what is done in the four labor market programs. Here, a policy indi- cation is that our study provides insight into the complexity of using activation to create gender equality, where gender equality becomes strongly connected to the institutional dimensions of gender, class and race. Gender equality was understood by the interviewees to be fuzzy and complex and activation was clear cut and aligned with the work conducted within the programs and “the work-ﬁrst approach.” This was perhaps also connected to the construction of the local goals, where the activation goals were focused on the activation of the participant and the gender equality goals were focused on organizational measures, which were less connected to the daily work of the social workers and managers. Gendered activation may be reasonable on an individual level, where women in long-term unem- ployment can sustain a higher income and thus reach income independence from family members and the welfare state through work (Gornick, 1999; Lister, 2009). However, in the context of the gender segregated labor market and a situation where access to different types of work is still unequal, gendered activation reproduces gendered inequalities. Here, the results of our study align with scholars who have highlighted how the increasing interest in activation policy among welfare states overshadows claims of gender equality, where the gender equality goals become no-matter-what employment rather than employment leading to equal outcomes (Crespi, 2009; Jenson, 2015; Mulinari, 2018). Lastly, gendered activation also sheds light on the unequal relationship between sub-groups of women. Here, our study shows how gender equality and activation is applied differently on migrant women. The issue of unemployment is given cultural explanations when it regards migrant women and how the migrant women symbolizes an ‘other’ in need of activation (cf. Mulinari, 2018; Vesterberg, 2015). While the interviewees in our empirical material did not give voice to clear claims of racial discrimination in terms of treating participants differently based on race, our material points to an example of the systemic reproduction of racist discourse within social and labor market policies (Mulinari, 2018). To gain more knowledge on how racist discourses are further operationalized, a more in-depth analysis of the day-to-day activation is needed. In rela- tion to this, it is also paramount to include the experiences of individuals being activated to deepen our understanding of the complex processes of inequalities and discrimination. Declaration of Conﬂicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conﬂicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publica- tion of this article. Funding This work was supported by Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (grant number 2016-07123). 296 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) ORCID iD Ellen Parsland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1569-8582 Notes 1. We use logic, institutional logic and competing institutional logic synonymously throughout the text. 2. By international migrants we mean individuals who have experienced an international migration process. i.e., a permanent change of residence that means a moving across nation borders and that is politically distinct from internal migration (see Dahinden, 2016). 3. https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/co/CEDAW.C.SWE.CO.7.pdf References Acker, J. (2009). From glass ceiling to inequality regimes. Sociologie du Travail, 51(2), 199–207. https://doi. org/10.4000/sdt.16407 Acker, J. (2011). Theorizing gender, race, and class in organizations. In E. L. Jeanes, D. Knights, & P. Yancey Martin (Eds.), Handbook of gender, work and organization (pp. 65-80). Wiley. Alford, R. R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state, and democracy. Cambridge University Press. Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265–1281. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586822 Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2008). Tolkning och reﬂektion: vetenskapsﬁlosoﬁ och kvalitativ metod. Lund. Angelov, N., Johansson, P., & Lindahl, E. (2013). Det envisa könsgapet i inkomster och löner: hur mycket kan förklaras av skillnader i familjeansvar? Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU). Bazely, P. (2009). Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes’. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 6–22. Bursell, M. (2012). Ethnic discrimination, name change and labor market inequality: Mixed approaches to ethnic exclusion in Sweden. acta universitatis stockholmiensis. Calmfors, L., Forslund, A., & Hemström, M. (2002). Does active labour market policy work?: Lessons from the Swedish experiences. Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU). Clasen, J., Clegg, D., & Goerne, A. (2016). Comparative social policy analysis and active labour market policy: Putting quality before quantity. Journal of Social Policy, 45(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0047279415000434 Collins, H. P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge. Crenshaw, K. (1991, July). Mapping the margins. Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 Crespi, I. (2009). Gender differences and equality issues in Europe: Critical aspects of gender mainstreaming policies. International Review of Sociology, 19(1), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700802614010 Dahinden, J. (2016). A plea for the ‘de-migranticization’ of research on migration and integration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(13), 2207–2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129 Dequech, D. (2008). Logics of justiﬁcation and logics of action. Journal of Economic Issues, 42(2), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507162 Edebalk, P. G., & Olsson, M. (2010). Poor relief, taxes and the ﬁrst universal pension reform: The origin of the Swedish welfare state reconsidered. Scandinavian Journal of History, 35(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/10. 1080/03468755.2010.491635 Eliassi, B. (2015). Constructing cultural otherness within the Swedish welfare state: The cases of social workers in Sweden. Qualitative Social Work, 14(4), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014559091 Eliassi, B. (2017). Conceptions of immigrant integration and racism among social workers in Sweden. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 28(1), 6–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2017.1249242 Parsland and Ulmestig 297 Fahlgren, S. (2013). The paradox of a gender-balanced workforce: The discursive construction of gender among Swedish social workers. Afﬁlia, 28(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109912475162 Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional change. In W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago University Press. Geldof, D. (1999). New activation policies: Promises and risks. In Linking welfare and work (pp. 13–26). European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Gerﬁn, M., & Lechner, M. (2002). A microeconometric evaluation of the active labour market policy in Switzerland. The Economic Journal, 112(482), 854–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00072 Giddens, A. (2013). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. John Wiley & Sons. Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the critics’ corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authen- ticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1031–1055. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00531.x Gornick, C. J. (1999). Gender equality in the labour market. In D. Sainsbury (Ed.), Gender and welfare state regimes (pp. 210-242). Oxford University Press. Government Ofﬁces of Sweden. (2016). Sveriges återkommande rapportering om efterlevnaden av CEDAW. Retrieved June 30, 2020 from https://www.regeringen.se/internationella-mr-granskningar-av-sverige/2014/ 09/sveriges-aterkommande-rapportering-om-efterlevnaden-av-cedaw/ Gubrium, J. F., Holstein, J. A., Marvasti, A. B., & McKinney, K. D. (Eds.). (2012). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. Sage Publications. Hansen, C. H. (2018). Recognition and gendered identity constructions in labour activation. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12294 Herbst, A., & Benjamin, O. (2016). Between activation and supporting women alternative operation of welfare-to-work programs. Social Policy & Administration, 50(5), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol. Hernes, H. (1987). Welfare state and women power: Essays in state feminism. Universitetsforlaget. Hübinette, T., Hörnfeldt, H., Farahani, F., & León Rosales, R. (2012). Om ras och vithet i det samtida Sverige. Mångkulturellt centrum. Hübinette, T., & Lundström, C. (2014). Three phases of hegemonic whiteness: Understanding racial temporal- ities in Sweden. Social Identities, 20(6), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2015.1004827 Hussénius, K. (2019). Intersectional patterns of social assistance eligibility in Sweden. Nordic Social Work Research, 11(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2019.1601636 Hvinden, B. (1999). Activation: A Nordic perspective. In Linking welfare and work (pp. 27–42). European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Jacobsson, K., Hollertz, K., & Garsten, C. (2017). Local worlds of activation: The diverse pathways of three Swedish municipalities. Nordic Social Work Research, 7(2), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X. 2016.1277255 Jenson, J. (2015). The fading goal of gender equality: Three policy directions that underpin the resilience of gen- dered socio-economic inequalities. Social Politics, 22(44), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv035 Jessen, J. T., & Tufte, P. A. (2014). Discretionary decision-making in a changing context of activation policies and welfare reforms. Journal of Social Policy, 43(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000998 Jones, A. (2012). Welfare reform and labour market activation. Local Economy, 27(5-6), 431–448. https://doi. org/10.1177/0269094212454408 Knocke, W. (2001). Integration or segregation? Immigrant populations facing the labor market in Sweden. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 21(3), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X00213005 Krook, M. L., & Mackay, F. (2011). Introduction: Gender, politics and institutions. In M. L. Krook & F. Mackay (Eds.), Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism (pp. 1–20). Palgrave Macmillan. Kullberg, C. (2004). Work and social support: Social workers’ assessments of male and female clients’ problems and needs. Afﬁlia, 19(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109903262759 298 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) Larsson, K. J. (2015). Integrationen och arbetets marknad: Hur jämställdhet, arbete och annat “svenskt” görs av arbetsförmedlare och privata aktörer [Doctoral disseration]. Linköping: Linköpings universitet. Lister, R. (2009, Summer). A Nordic nirvana? Gender, citizenship, and social justice in the Nordic welfare states. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 16(2), 242–278. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/sp/jxp007 Lødemel, I. (1997). The welfare paradox: Income maintenance and personal social services in Norway and Britain, 1946–1966. Scandinavian University Press. Lødemel, I., & Moreira, A. (2014). Activation or workfare? Governance and the neo-liberal convergence. Oxford University Press. Lundqvist, Å. (2017). Transforming gender and family relations: How active labour market policies shaped the dual earner model. Edward Elgar Publishing. March, J. G., & Olsen, P. J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. Free Press. Martinsson, L., Grifﬁn, G., & Giritli Nygren, K. (2016). Challenging the myth of gender equality in Sweden. Policy Press. Mehrotra, G. (2010). Toward a continuum of intersectionality theorizing for feminist social work scholarship. Afﬁlia, 25(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109910384190 Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 Meyer, R. E. (2008). New sociology of knowledge: Historical legacy and contributions to current debates in institutional research. In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 519–538). London: Sage. Midtbøen, H. A., & Teigen, M. (2014). Social investment in gender equality? Changing perspectives on work and welfare in Norway. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22(4), 267–282. https:// doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2014.964647 Morgen, S., Acker, J., & Weigt, M. J. (2013). Stretched thin: Poor families, welfare work and welfare reform. Cornell University Press. Mulinari, P. (2018). A new service class in the public sector? The role of femonationalism in unemployment policies. Social Inclusion, 6(4), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i4.1575 Nybom, J. (2013). Activation and ‘coercion’ among Swedish social assistance claimants with different work barriers and socio-demographic characteristics: What is the logic? International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00858.x Panican, A., & Johansson, H. (2016). Strategies against poverty in a social democratic local welfare system: Still the responsibility of public actors? In A. Panican & H. Johansson (Eds.), Combating poverty in local welfare systems (pp. 155–177). Palgrave Macmillan. Popescu Ljungholm, D. (2017). Feminist institutionalism revisited: The gendered features of the norms, rules, and routines operating within institutions. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 7(1), 248–254. https://doi. org/10.22381/JRGS7120179 Raffass, T. (2017). Demanding activation. Journal of Social Policy, 46(2), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S004727941600057X Rafnsdóttir, L. G., & Weight, J. (2018). Addressing the horizontal gender division of labour: A case study of support and obstacles in a heavy industry plant in Iceland. Sex Roles, 80(1-2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11199-018-0915-7 Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(06), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803 Rueda, D. (2015). The state of the welfare state: Unemployment, labor market policy, and inequality in the age of workfare. Comparative Politics, 47(3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041515814709275 Sager, M., & Mulinari, D. (2018). Safety for whom? Exploring femonationalism and care-racism in Sweden. Women’s Studies International Forum, 68(2018), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.12.002 Parsland and Ulmestig 299 Sainsbury, D. (1999). Gender and social democratic welfare states. In D. Sainsbury (Ed.), Gender and welfare state regimes (pp. 75-114). Oxford University Press. Salonen, T. (1993). Margins of welfare. A study of modern functions of social assistance. Hällestad Press. Kristianstad Boktryckeri. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Sage. Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. Routledge. Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. University of Chicago Press. Statistics Sweden. (2020). 30 största yrkerna. https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/ arbetsmarknad/sysselsattning-forvarvsarbete-och-arbetstider/yrkesregistret-med-yrkesstatistik/pong/tabell-och- diagram/30-storsta-yrkena/ Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35 Svensson, E.-M., & Gunnarsson, Å. (2012). Gender equality in the Swedish welfare state. feminists@law, 2(1), 1–27. Swedish National Mediation Ofﬁce. (2020). Löneskillnaden mellan kvinnor och män 2019, vad säger den ofﬁ- ciella lönestatistiken? https://www.mi.se/publikationer/loneskillnaden-ar-2019/ Tan, J., & Wang, L. (2011). MNC strategic responses to ethical pressure: An institutional logic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0553-7 Thorén, K. (2008). “Activation policy in action”: A street-level study of social assistance in the Swedish welfare state. Växjö University Press. Thorén, K. (2012). Kommunal arbetsmarknadspolitik – en kunskapsöversikt över åtgärder för arbetslösa social- bidragstagare. Rapporter från riksdagen 2011/12:RFR 14, Arbetsmarknadsutskottet AU, Del 2. Riksdagstryckeriet. Thornton, P., Jones, C., & Kury, K. (2005). Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: Transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing. In C. Jones & P. Thornton (Eds.), Transformation in cultural industries (research in the sociology of organizations, vol. 23) (pp. 125–170). London: JAI. Ulmestig, R., & Marston, G. (2015). Street-level perceptions of procedural rights for young unemployed people– a comparative study between Sweden and Australia. Social Policy & Administration, 49(3), 394–411. https:// doi.org/10.1111/spol.12085 Vernby, K., & Dancygier, R. (2018). Etniska hierarkier och diskriminering på arbetsmarknaden: Resultat från ett faktoriellt fältexperiment. IFAU – institutet för arbetsmarknads- och utbildningspolitisk utvärdering. Vesterberg, V. (2015). Learning to be Swedish: Governing migrants in labor-market projects. Studies in Continuing Education, 37(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1043987 Vesterberg, V. (2016). Ethnicizing employability: Governing the unemployed in labour market projects in Sweden [Doctoral dissertation]. Linköping University. Vincent, K., & Eveline, J. (2010). The invisibility of gendered power relations in domestic violence policy. In C. L. Bacchi & J. Eveline (Eds.), Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory (pp. 215- 236). University of Adelaide Press. Wolgast, S., Molina, I., & Gardell, M. (2018). Antisvart rasism och diskriminering på arbetsmarknaden (Vol. 21). Länsstyrelsen. Wright Nielsen, T. (2009). Viljen til at frigøre. En undersøgelse af empowerment i praksis. Socialhögskolan, Lunds universitet. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Affilia SAGE http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/gendered-activation-at-the-expense-of-gender-equality-activation-and-kj6NiI2ymL

Loading next page...

References (86)

K. Vincent, J. Eveline (2008)
The invisibility of gendered power relations in domestic violence policy
Journal of Family Studies, 14
P. Resnick (1988)
Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state and democracy
L. Martinsson, G. Griffin, K. Nygren (2016)
Challenging the Myth of Gender Equality in Sweden
David Rueda (2015)
The State of the Welfare State: Unemployment, Labor Market Policy, and Inequality in the Age of Workfare
Comparative politics, 47
David Dequech (2008)
Logics of Justification and Logics of Action
Journal of Economic Issues, 42
Siv Fahlgren (2013)
The Paradox of a Gender-Balanced Workforce
Affilia, 28
Bev Skeggs (2003)
Class, Self, Culture
H. Hansen (2018)
Recognition and gendered identity constructions in labour activation
International Journal of Social Welfare, 27
D. Ljungholm (2017)
FEMINIST INSTITUTIONALISM REVISITED: THE GENDERED FEATURES OF THE NORMS, RULES, AND ROUTINES OPERATING WITHIN INSTITUTIONS
Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 7
V. Vesterberg (2015)
Learning to be Swedish: governing migrants in labour-market projects
Studies in Continuing Education, 37
P. Edebalk, M. Olsson (2010)
Poor Relief, Taxes and the First Universal Pension Reform: the origin of the Swedish welfare state reconsidered
Scandinavian Journal of History, 35
(2012)
Kommunal arbetsmarknadspolitik – en kunskapsöversikt över åtgärder för arbetslösa
J. Gubrium, James Holstein, A. Marvasti, Karyn Marvasti (2012)
The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft
(1993)
Margins of welfare. A study of modern functions of social assistance
Anat Herbst, Orly Benjamin (2016)
Between Activation and Supporting Women – Alternative Operation of Welfare‐to‐work Programmes
Social Policy & Administration, 50
Åsa Lundqvist (2017)
Transforming Gender and Family Relations: How Active Labour Market Policies Shaped the Dual Earner Model
A. Jones (2012)
Welfare reform and labour market activation
Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 27
Gita Mehrotra (2010)
Toward a Continuum of Intersectionality Theorizing for Feminist Social Work Scholarship
Affilia, 25
M. Glynn, M. Lounsbury (2005)
From the Critics' Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System
Journal of Management Studies, 42
Arnfinn Midtbøen, M. Teigen (2014)
Social Investment in Gender Equality? Changing Perspectives on Work and Welfare in Norway
NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22
Joan Acker (2009)
From glass ceiling to inequality regimes
Sociologie Du Travail, 51
(2008)
Tolkning och reflektion: vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod
K. Crenshaw (1991)
Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color
Stanford Law Review, 43
(1991)
Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional change
Maja Sager, Diana Mulinari (2017)
Safety for whom? Exploring femonationalism and care-racism in Sweden
Womens Studies International Forum, 68
A. Davis (1993)
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment
Teaching Philosophy, 16
T. Reay, C. Hinings (2009)
Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics
Organization Studies, 30
(2021)
Disciplining the Poor:
The Criminalisation of Social Policy in Neoliberal Societies
Barzoo Eliassi (2017)
Conceptions of Immigrant Integration and Racism Among Social Workers in Sweden
Journal of Progressive Human Services, 28
Justin Tan, Liang Wang (2011)
MNC Strategic Responses to Ethical Pressure: An Institutional Logic Perspective
Journal of Business Ethics, 98
Wuokko Knocke (2000)
Integration or Segregation? Immigrant Populations Facing the Labour Market in Sweden
Economic and Industrial Democracy, 21
R. Sills (1998)
The third way: the renewal of social democracy
M. Gerfin, M. Lechner (2001)
A Microeconometric Evaluation of Active Labor Market Policy in Switzerland
CEPR Discussion Paper Series
E. Svensson, Åsa Gunnarsson (2012)
Gender Equality in the Swedish Welfare State
, 2
J. Clasen, D. Clegg, Alexander Goerne (2015)
Comparative Social Policy Analysis and Active Labour Market Policy: Putting Quality before Quantity
Journal of Social Policy, 45
S. Morgen, Joan Acker, Jill Weigt (2010)
Stretched Thin: Poor Families, Welfare Work, and Welfare Reform
R. Lister (2009)
A Nordic Nirvana?: Gender, Citizenship, and Social Justice in the Nordic Welfare States
Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 16
(2018)
Etniska hierarkier och diskriminering på arbetsmarknaden: Resultat från ett faktoriellt fältexperiment. IFAU – institutet för arbetsmarknads- och utbildningspolitisk utvärdering
Guðbjörg Rafnsdóttir, Jill Weigt (2018)
Addressing the Horizontal Gender Division of Labor: A Case Study of Support and Obstacles in a Heavy Industry Plant in Iceland
Sex Roles, 80
Lars Calmfors, Anders Forslund, M. Hemstrom (2002)
Does Active Labour Market Policy Work? Lessons from the Swedish Experiences
CESifo Working Paper Series
A. Irving (2013)
Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. By Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording, and Sanford F. Schram. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. Pp. 368. $81.00 (cloth); $25.00 (paper).
Social Service Review, 87
(2020)
30 största yrkerna
M. Krook, F. Mackay (2011)
Introduction: Gender, Politics, and Institutions
K. Thorén (2008)
Activation Policy in Action : A Street-Level Study of Social Assistance in the Swedish Welfare State
F. Bennett (2019)
Transforming gender and family relations: how active labour market policies shaped the dual earner model By AsaLundqvist, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017. ISBN: 9781786436283; £70 (Hbk).
Social Policy & Administration
R. Ulmestig, G. Marston (2015)
Street-level Perceptions of Procedural Rights for Young Unemployed People – A Comparative Study between Sweden and Australia
Social Policy & Administration, 49
(2013)
Det envisa könsgapet i inkomster och löner: hur mycket kan förklaras av skillnader i familjeansvar?
Tabitha Nielsen (2009)
Viljen til at frigøre. En undersøgelse af empowerment i praksis
, 35
Kerstin Jacobsson, K. Hollertz, C. Garsten (2017)
Local worlds of activation: the diverse pathways of three Swedish municipalities
Nordic Social Work Research, 7
M. Alvesson, Dan Kärreman (2007)
Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development
Academy of Management Review, 32
Jennie Larsson (2015)
Integrationen och arbetets marknad Hur jämställdhet, arbete och annat "svenskt" görs av arbetsförmedlare och privata aktörer
Christian Kullberg (2004)
Work and Social Support: Social Workers’ Assessments of Male and Female Clients’ Problems and Needs
Affilia, 19
D. Geldof (1999)
New activation policies: promises and risks
(2018)
Antisvart rasism och diskriminering på arbetsmarknaden
Moa Bursell (2012)
Ethnic Discrimination, Name Change and Labor Market Inequality : Mixed approaches to ethnic exclusion in Sweden
P. Bazeley (2009)
Analysing Qualitative Data: More Than 'Identifying Themes'
(2016)
Sveriges återkommande rapportering om efterlevnaden av CEDAW
Klara Hussénius (2019)
Intersectional patterns of social assistance eligibility in Sweden
Nordic Social Work Research, 11
Joe Soss, Richard Fording, Sanford Schram (2011)
Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race
Paula Mulinari (2018)
A New Service Class in the Public Sector? The Role of Femonationalism in Unemployment Policies
Social Inclusion
Tobias Hübinette, Helena Hörnfeldt, Fataneh Farahani, René Rosales (2012)
Om ras och vithet i det samtida Sverige
W. Scott (2007)
Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests
I. Crespi (2009)
Gender differences and equality issues in Europe: critical aspects of gender mainstreaming policies
International Review of Sociology, 19
John Meyer, Brian Rowan (1977)
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
American Journal of Sociology, 83
(2011)
Theorizing gender, race, and class in organizations
(1999)
Activation : A Nordic perspective
R. Suddaby, R. Greenwood (2005)
Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy
Administrative Science Quarterly, 50
D. Sainsbury (1999)
Gender and Social‐Democratic Welfare States
Barzoo Eliassi (2015)
Constructing cultural Otherness within the Swedish welfare state: The cases of social workers in Sweden
Qualitative Social Work, 14
Tania Raffass (2016)
Demanding Activation
Journal of Social Policy, 46
J. Jenson (2015)
The Fading Goal of Gender Equality: Three Policy Directions that Underpin the Resilience of Gendered Socio-economic Inequalities
Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 22
Renate Meyer (2008)
New Sociology of Knowledge: Historical Legacy and Contributions to Current Debates in Institutional Research
J. Jessen, P. Tufte (2014)
Discretionary Decision-Making in a Changing Context of Activation Policies and Welfare Reforms
Journal of Social Policy, 43
J. Dahinden (2016)
A plea for the ‘de-migranticization' of research on migration and integration1
Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39
Patricia Thornton, Candace Jones, Kenneth Kury (2005)
Institutional Logics and Institutional Change in Organizations: Transformation in Accounting, Architecture, and Publishing
, 23
D. Clegg, B. Palier (2014)
Implementing a myth: The evolution of conditionality in French minimum income provision
V. Vesterberg (2016)
Ethnicizing Employability : Governing the Unemployed in Labour Market Projects in Sweden
Alexandru Panican, H. Johansson (2016)
Strategies against poverty in a Social democratic local Welfare system:: still the responsibility of public actors?
(2020)
Löneskillnaden mellan kvinnor och män 2019, vad säger den officiella lönestatistiken?
Tobias Hübinette, Catrin Lundström (2014)
Three phases of hegemonic whiteness: understanding racial temporalities in Sweden
Social Identities, 20
J. Gornick (1999)
Gender Equality in the Labour Market
Jenny Nybom (2013)
Activation and ‘coercion’ among Swedish social assistance claimants with different work barriers and socio‐demographic characteristics: What is the logic?
International Journal of Social Welfare, 22
J. March, Johan Olsen (1989)
Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics
H. Hernes (1987)
Welfare state and woman power : essays in state feminism
Åsa Lundqvist (2017)
Transforming Gender and Family Relations
Ivar Lødemel (1997)
The Welfare Paradox: Income Maintenance and Personal Social Services in Norway and Britain, 1946-1966

Publisher: SAGE
Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021
ISSN: 0886-1099
eISSN: 1552-3020
DOI: 10.1177/08861099211045977
Publisher site: See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study aims to understand how goals of activation and gender equality interact in labor market programs directed towards activating unemployed participants. The study draws on interviews with 28 social workers and managers at four Swedish municipally governed labor market programs typ- ically targeted towards poor, unemployed individuals with little to no attachment to the labor mar- ket or social insurance system. Our ﬁndings show that activation goals are understood to be clear cut and a dominant logic within the labor market programs. The gender equality goals are under- stood as fuzzy and subordinate to the activation logic. Our theoretical analysis, based on neo-insti- tutional theory, shows that gendered activation as a hybrid logic is created within the four programs as a means of handling the competing logics of gender equality and activation. Gendered activation may be reasonable on an individual level, where women in long-term unemployment can sustain a higher income through work and become ﬁnancially independent. In the context of the gender seg- regated labor market, gendered activation reproduces gendered inequalities when an increasing interest for activation policy among welfare states overshadows claims of gender equality. Furthermore, our study exempliﬁes the systemic reproduction of racist discourse within social- and labour market policies. Within the logic of gendered activation, migrant women become singled out as speciﬁcally problematic for Swedish society to handle when unemployment is given gendered and cultural explanations. Through the logic of gendered activation, gender equality goals become no-matter-what employment rather than employment leading to equal outcomes. Keywords activation, gender equality, social work practice, Swedish welfare state, women in poverty Received August 5, 2020; revised April 27, 2021; accepted August 25, 2021 PhD-candidate, School of Social Work, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Associate professor, Department of Social Work, Linnæus University, Kalmar, Sweden Corresponding Author: Ellen Parsland, School of Social Work, Lund University, Box 23, Lund 22100, Sweden. Email: Ellen.parsland@soch.lu.se 280 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) Introduction Activation refers to policies that enforce participation in the labour market by making beneﬁts con- ditional on active participation in employment programs. Claims of activation and gender equality have gone hand in hand over the last few decades to become powerful claims for welfare states ﬁght- ing injustice and inequality in society (cf. Jenson, 2015; Lister, 2009; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). In Sweden, the activation trend is connected to the classic active labor market policy (Geldof, 1999; Giddens, 2013). Today, activation has a great inﬂuence on how Sweden tries to estab- lish and re-establish people in the labor market (Panican & Johansson, 2016). In parallel, gender equality has been a vital component for the inclusion of women in the labor market as well as the shift from a male bread winner model to a dual bread winner model (Hernes, 1987; Lister, 2009; Lundqvist, 2017). In this paper we problematize the relationship between activation and gender equality as an under- examined phenomenon. We do so by using institutional logics as theoretical constructs that display the organizing principles for an institutional ﬁeld through competing knowledge claims (Friedland & Alford, 1991; Reay & Hinings, 2009; Scott, 2008). Activation and gender equality are competing logics in the ﬁeld of labor market programs but are harmonizing in some aspects, for example, when activation is described to be a fruitful way to increase women’s employment. This can be seen in policy documents in the European Union (Jenson, 2015; Midtbøen & Teigen, 2014), United States (Morgen et al., 2013; Soss et al., 2011) and other Nordic countries (Hansen, 2018; Lister, 2009; Lundqvist, 2017; Martinsson et al., 2016; Midtbøen & Teigen, 2014). However, the push for activation as a means to solve gender inequalities is not friction free. In policy documents, women are categorized as ungendered workers, mothers, migrants or otherwise victimized and thus proclaimed to be in need of any form of employment rather than quality employment. This catego- rization of women’s employment risks reinforcing unequal gender structures in the labor market and society as a whole (Jenson, 2015; Mulinari, 2018). As such, we argue that the knowledge claim for employment as a means to ensure women’s liberation needs to be problematized. In other words, gender equality in the ﬁeld of activation risks becoming a numerical issue rather than an issue of equalizing power between men and women where inequities in the quality of work and the gender contract itself are no longer an issue (see also Fahlgren, 2013; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). From a policy perspective, Sweden makes broad claims of gender equality while maintaining a horizontally and vertically gender segregated labor market, which has been criticized by United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) (Government ofﬁces of Sweden, 2016). In this perspective, labor market participation may be a path towards increased equality for individual women living in poverty, where employment can provide economic freedom, while structural levels of gender inequality are maintained. The latest ofﬁcial statistics for the thirty largest occupations in Sweden show that in 2018, only four occupations have an equal gender distribution. The most female-dominated occupation was preschool teachers (96% women, 4% men). The most male-dominated occupation was carpenters (1% women, 99% men) (Statistics Sweden, 2020). Furthermore, the gender pay gap has been more or less constant in Sweden over the past three decades (Angelov et al., 2013). In 2019, the Swedish gender pay gap was 9.9 percent according to ofﬁcial statistics (Swedish National Mediation Ofﬁce, 2020). The Nordic welfare state model, with high social security, is based on high labor market participation and systems that protect citizens from income lost due to, for example, unemployment through a public social insurance system (Edebalk & Olsson, 2010). Thus, universal claims of the Nordic model are not applicable for women to the same degree as men, when women on a structural level are paid less and receive social security beneﬁts to a larger extent than men (Martinsson et al., 2016; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). Parsland and Ulmestig 281 This issue is even more evident when it comes to marginalized groups such as international migrant women who not only face a gender segregated labor market but also racial discrimination (Bursell, 2012; Knocke, 2001; Vernby & Dancygier, 2018; Wolgast et al., 2018). However, while gender equality may be institutionalized in Swedish policy as a tool to enable women to combine work and family life, the dominant feminist discourse in Sweden has failed to highlight the unequal relations between subgroups of women (Hussénius, 2019; Martinsson et al., 2016). Constructing the Swedish identity as a progressive feminist nation implies a projection of foreign countries as traditional and gender unequal (Vesterberg, 2015). Thus, international migrants (mainly non-European migrants) are also inﬂicted with this projection, causing a binary between being ‘Swedish’ or ‘other’ (Vesterberg, 2015). Speciﬁcally through labor market policy, migrant women are targeted as victims of their own culture (Mulinari, 2018; Wright Nielsen, 2009). Furthermore, the unemployment of migrant women is not only described in labor market policy as a problem for individual women, but also a challenge for gender equality more broadly (Mulinari, 2018). In social work research, Eliassi (2015, 2017) has shown how the categorization of clients as ‘immigrants’ or ‘Muslim’ is connected to Swedish social workers’ perception of the client as gender-traditional. Furthermore, perceived cultural differences are central in how social workers frame, assess and formulate interventions for clients. When analyzing gender equality, it is thus crucial to not only consider how individual experiences are connected to gender, but rather how gender inequality intersects with other inequalities that individuals experience simultaneously, which create complex processes of discrimination (Acker, 2011; Collins, 2000; Crenshaw, 1991; Mehrotra, 2010). In light of the intersectional dimensions of activation and gender inequality, this study exam- ines how goals of activation and gender equality interact in labor market programs directed towards activating unemployed participants, including migrant women. Little focus has been given to how the logics of activation and gender equality compete on an organizational level in public labor market programs. In this article, our empirical setting is municipal labor market pro- grams, which are typically targeted to poor, unemployed individuals with little to no attachment to the labor market or social insurance system. A labor market program, as described by Lødemel and Moreira (2014), consists of services that offer a set of speciﬁc activation options and have a speciﬁc set of formal conditions and sanctions. Also, according to previous research, if the program targets migrant participants, gender equality is a frequent issue addressed in policy doc- uments for labor market programs since gender equality is connected to the idea of learning to be Swedish (Larsson, 2015; Vesterberg, 2015). Given this context, this study aims to understand how goals of activation and gender equality interact in labor market programs directed towards acti- vating unemployed participants. How are activation and gender equality given meaning in the descriptions of managers and staff in four labor market programs? And how in turn are these meanings applied differentially to international migrant women on the basis of migration and race? The Logics of Gender Equality and Activation Institutions, from a sociological point of view, are the formal and informal rules, norms, procedures and symbolical systems that govern everyday life and guide human behavior (March & Olsen, 1989). Mainstream neo-institutionalists have been criticized for failing to take gender into account when studying institutions (see Krook & Mackay, 2011; Popescu Ljungholm, 2017). As argued by feminist institutionalists, institutions are heavily permeated by gender (Popescu Ljungholm, 2017). For example, gendered norms regarding the distribution of paid and unpaid work inﬂuence one’s position in the labor market and in the social security system (Cf. Acker, 2009; Kullberg, 2004; Morgen et al., 2013; Nybom, 2013). 282 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) However, only taking gender into account is not sufﬁcient in an analysis regarding gender inequalities, as the experiences of individuals is not only connected to gender (Mehrotra, 2010). Different inequalities are intertwined with each other, creating complex processes of discrimination, exclusion and difference making (Acker, 2011; Collins, 2000; Crenshaw, 1991). Race and racism, much like gender and gender inequality, takes different shapes based on context. In Sweden, the dis- course regarding racism and xenophobia have historically been vague and imprecise, as categories of culture and ethnicity are more often used in ofﬁcial statistics and research, rather than speaking of race (Vesterberg, 2015). This practice is however challenged by post-colonial researchers as prob- lematic (see Hübinette et al., 2012; Hübinette & Lundström, 2014; Larsson, 2015; Mulinari, 2018). It is necessary to speak of racism, and thus race, since a vast number of the Swedish popula- tion are being discriminated against and systematically separated from what is known as ‘Swedish’ based on their non-white bodies (Hübinette et al., 2012; Larsson, 2015). These processes of racial- ization create a hierarchal structure of ‘us’ and ‘them’ that is institutional and systemic. The racial- ization processes are created and reproduced in the meeting between individuals, both consciously and unconsciously (Larsson, 2015). We seek to capture racialization processes that are targeted towards unemployed individuals that especially distinguishes migrant women as a racially-charged construct. We use the category of migrants to apprehend the activation of a very heterogeneous group of individuals who have migrated to Sweden, in terms of country of origin, race and lived experi- ences. International migrants are of particular interest for Swedish labor market policy, where spe- ciﬁc activation measures and policies target migrants. In national labour market policy have international migrants been separated from other unemployed individuals since 2010, through the establishment reform. Through the reform speciﬁc activation measures, beneﬁts and demands on unemployed migrants was created that efﬁciently have separated unemployed migrants from other unemployed (Larsson, 2015). This targeting of migrants is often done in ways that risk feeding racist institutions in society and reproducing racial hierarchies through racialization processes (Mulinari, 2018; Sager & Mulinari, 2018; Vesterberg, 2015). In our study, structures and experiences connected to race and/or class seem to relate to how gender equality and activation is given meaning in the labor market programs. Class permeates the labour market programs since they solely target unemployed individuals living on social assis- tance, meaning poor people who are not established in the social insurance system. As discussed by Hübinette and Lundström (2014); Sager and Mulinari (2018), Mulinari (2018), gender equality policy in Sweden is connected to a sense of national identity that excludes migrants from the very notion of gender equality, as they are constructed to be patriarchal and not interested in change. Thus, by adopting an intersectional approach in our study, we highlight how activation may differ for migrant women. We do so by using intersectionality as a heuristic principle in our institutional analysis of our material (Acker, 2011). The framework of intersectionality reminds us that intercon- nected systems of inequality operate on multiple levels in which they affect marginalized groups in society, and hence needs to be represented in the analysis of our material (Mehrotra, 2010). Institutional logics offers support in studying the intersectional impacts of societal-level knowl- edge on the behavior and cognition of actors, such as organizations and individuals (Thornton et al., 2005). As such, logics are much like discourses, i.e. theoretical constructs that help display the governing through institutionalized taken-for-granted knowledge claims (Alford & Friedland, 1985; Friedland & Alford, 1991). Institutional logics, to a higher degree than discourses, considers the role of actors and subjects in the way power forms persist and change. Institutions are contradic- tory by nature. Logics as knowledge claims become a way for actors to handle conﬂicts within the institutions as well as implement change; logics thus provide a link between institutions and action (Friedland & Alford, 1991; Reay & Hinings, 2009). Individuals and organizations can manipulate and elaborate knowledge claims, and knowledge can thus become more harmonized and well- incorporated and easier for individuals and organizations to process (see Friedland & Alford, Parsland and Ulmestig 283 1991). Knowledge governs what is considered legitimate in the ﬁeld and thus affects the way differ- ent organizations act (Dequech, 2008; Suddaby & Greenwood, 2005). The actors in this study, social workers and managers, thus have some degree of discretion in how they work and use knowledge claims, although this is embedded in a normatively and cognitively controlled context, i.e. labor market programs (see Friedland & Alford, 1991). To capture how knowledge is handled and understood by the social workers and managers, we use the concepts of symbols, rituals and hybrids with regard to the concept of competitive institutional logics. Symbols are essential for institutional logics since they create meaning for the actors and through that maintain the logics in an institutionalized ﬁeld (Friedland & Alford, 1991). Symbols are manifested through written and spoken language, for example, through organizational goals that can provide both legitimacy and a taken-for-granted truth (Friedland & Alford, 1991). Logics are concretized through ritualized behaviors in accordance with knowledge within the logic. For instance, the monitoring of the participants, including migrant women, within the labor market pro- grams is a ritualized behavior. As such, the logics can be analytically explored by extracting the sym- bolic and ritualized practices conducted in an institutional ﬁeld. In labor market programs as an institutionalized ﬁeld, several knowledge claims exist and compete for power on the ﬁeld, as one logic is dominant and others are subordinate (Reay & Hinings, 2009). Rituals and symbols maintain the logics and thus deﬁne and legitimize these logics, but they also serve to limit or increase the scope of the institutionalized ﬁeld (see Tan & Wang, 2011). The organizational quest for legitimacy comes with the risk that there will be a loose connection between symbols and rituals within the logic on one side, and what the social workers aim to do on the other side. Meaning that there is a loose connection between the practical work of social workers and what the organization symbolizes. To minimize competition, logics can also collectively create a hybrid logic (Glynn & Lounsbury, 2005; Thornton et al., 2005). In our analysis, we use two logics based on a literature review as we aim to create a greater understanding of activation and gender equality in labor market programs between women and men as well as among subgroups of women. Activation Logic Activation, inspired by Hvinden (1999) and Jones (2012), is deﬁned as a policy where the formal aim is to assist a target group in entering or re-entering the labor market and includes formal conditions and sanctions. Among policymakers in the global North, activation has become a success story in ﬁghting unemployment and poverty (Clasen et al., 2016; Gerﬁn & Lechner, 2002; Herbst & Benjamin, 2016). However, activation within labor market programs has also been criticized for being mainly symbolic to show political strength due to a lack of proven positive effects (Clasen et al., 2016; Raffass, 2017; Rueda, 2015). The idea of keeping the unemployed active is not such a new concept in the Swedish welfare state as it is in many other states, where the “work-ﬁrst approach” (in Swedish; Arbetslinjen) has been a part of labor market policy for many decades (See Salonen, 1993; Thorén, 2008). The work-ﬁrst concept has changed somewhat over the years, but in the context of municipal labor market policy, it is a symbol of the duty to work to support yourself and become ﬁnancially self-sufﬁcient (Thorén, 2008). Activation, and labor market pro- grams by extension, contains rituals to maintain the work-ﬁrst approach. Thus, promoting discipline to the unemployed can be seen as a part of the activation process, making them more motivated to enter or re-enter the labor market (see Jacobsson et al., 2017; Lødemel & Moreira, 2014). Another shared aspect of the Nordic Welfare states is the dual character of their labor market policies (Lødemel, 1997; Ulmestig & Marston, 2015). One national labor market policy is implemented through the Swedish Public Employment Service, mainly for estab- lished workers. Those with access to unemployment insurance and other social insurance solutions receive beneﬁts that depend on the public social insurance scheme. The other side of the dual welfare 284 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) system is the municipal labor market policy, which mainly serves poor people who are not estab- lished in the social insurance system and are thus dependent on the means-tested assistance system. The welfare system institutionalizes this dual character and also maintains the gendered hier- archy of paid and unpaid work, where it is mainly women who need to establish themselves on the labor market to become ﬁnancially independent through pension schemes and the possibility to receive sickness beneﬁts, maternity leave and other welfare beneﬁts (see Mulinari, 2018). The four municipal labor programs we study here are characterized by interagency cooperation, professional staff for individual services, inclusion of market logics and decentralization/new ways of governance (see Jessen & Tufte, 2014; Lødemel & Moreira, 2014). The social workers in the pro- grams often have an educational background and the skills needed to support people to make behav- ioral changes and transform the way they relate to the labor market. The programs work closely with the Swedish Public Employment Service as they subsidize constructed work for the unemployed par- ticipants in the programs, as the work does not compete with regular employees’ work tasks (see Calmfors et al., 2002; Mulinari, 2018). The labor market programs are administered through a joint organization that is managed by a board of local politicians. The managers work quite indepen- dently in relation to the over-arching organization. Both the managers as well as the social workers have strong discretionary powers but are set to follow the local political goals set by the board of the labor market organization. Examples of the local activation goals that govern the labor market pro- grams are: � Women and men in the [municipality name] provide for themselves and have sustainable employment � Women and men from 16–29 years of age either study or work � The Board’s measures contribute to providing employers with access to requested skills The local activation goals given as examples are not about what the programs do. Instead, the goals are aimed towards what the participants will become through the programs and thus serve as exam- ples of the disciplinary nuances of activation. Gender Equality Logic Gender equality, according to the CEDAW deﬁnition, means that states will ensure that men and women have the same rights. As such, gender equality concerns equalizing power between men and women. Within the ﬁeld of labor market policy, gender equality has mainly been focused on gen- dered differences in the labor market in a variety of ways (Gornick, 1999). Here, our main focus is the gendered differences in occupation, as horizontal and vertical gender segregation in the labor market has been an ongoing concern in Sweden and is linked to women’s economic liberation from both family and government (Angelov et al., 2013; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). In the country’s elaboration of the work-ﬁrst approach, Sweden’s national gender equality policies have been evolving since the middle of the 20th century. Gender equality was, and still is, an impor- tant symbol of high labor force participation as well as the idea of the universal welfare state (Lundqvist, 2017). Moreover, gender equality is an important symbol for Sweden, representing state feminism through gender mainstreaming where all national proposals and policies include a gender equality analysis and all public statistics are gender segregated (Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). However, the gender mainstreaming approach has also been criticized for its quest to neutral- ize the power differences between men and women. When the primary focus is making individual women equal to individual men rather than the relationship between women and men (Crespi, 2009). Also for approaches that equate to a gender-blind practice in policy outcomes by assuming that men and women are affected by policies in the same way (Vincent & Eveline, 2010). Parsland and Ulmestig 285 While the strategy of gender mainstreaming emphasizes gender equality on a policy level, research on gender mainstreaming practice in Swedish social work and labor market efforts has shown how gendered differentiation is reinforced as social workers tend to focus more effort on women’s involvement in family life rather than working life (Hussénius, 2019; Kullberg, 2004; Nybom, 2013). When speciﬁc measures are taken to activate women towards the labor market, it has been shown that gender segregation in the labor market is also reinforced as women are pushed towards traditional female professions such as child care or service-professions, especially when it comes to migrant women (Mulinari, 2018; Wright Nielsen, 2009). Examples on local gender equality goals are: � The Board expands and develops efforts to reach women with a weak position in the labor market […] Newly arrived women and women with a lower level of education are prioritized. � Employees, both women and men, have good and equal working conditions and an equal and sustainable work environment. � The activities of the Board have the prerequisites for working with gender mainstreaming and directed measures to increase gender equality. In contrast to the activation goals, that permeates the practical activation of the unemployed individ- uals, the gender equality goals is placed on an organizational level. The goals of gender equality, through a variety of measurements throughout the organizations is to increase gender equality. However, with little attachment to the day-to-day work within the labour market programs. Our literature review reveals a gap in previous research concerning how two strong institutional logics in the Swedish welfare state, activation and gender equality, interact. Especially within the frames of labour market programs where the logics have strong legitimate knowledge claims through ritualization and symbolization. Even more so, the gap contains a lack of knowledge regard- ing how migration and race intersects with the two logics and can thus be applied differently on migrant women. Methods The empirical data for this article is based on semi-structured interviews with 28 social workers and managers at four labor market programs within the same municipality in Sweden, hence following the same municipal goals of activation and gender equality. The concept behind these labor market programs is that participants will be hired within the municipality at wages that are subsidized by the state and municipality for a designated period of time, where they will also be assigned a job coach. There are differences between the programs concerning the support and target groups, as described in the Table 1 below. We made contact with the four managers of the programs for individual interviews and through them recruited a total of 24 social workers for group interviews. The semi-structured (Gubrium et al., 2012) interview guide was focused on professional perceptions regarding political goals and day-to-day work with unemployed participants. No demographic information regarding the inter- viewees was collected. We had no knowledge or relation to the four labor market programs prior to the study. The one researcher who did the interviews have practical knowledge of working as a social worker within the ﬁeld of municipal labor market program and social assistance, and thus had a reference frame that in some aspects could be shared with the interviewees and shape how questions were asked or how follow-up questions were formulated. We carried out the analysis through a reﬂective dialogue in several steps, focusing on available research, theory and interviews, where several contradictory results and different perspectives 286 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) Table 1. Overview of Labor Market Programs. Program Target group Support Activation Youths, 16-29 years old. Mix of collective and individual support, emphasis on program W motivational work, coaching towards education and employment, developing CV, employed outside of program. Activation Unemployed who get ﬁnancial aid Collective support, little motivation work, coaching program X from the municipality. Over mainly towards employment, developing CV, 25 years old. employed outside of program. Activation Unemployed who get ﬁnancial aid Collective support, little motivational work, program Y from the municipality. Over emphasis on coaching, coaching towards 25 years old. education and employment, developing CV, in-house employment. Activation Socially and criminally charged youths, Individual support, emphasis on motivational work, program Z 18-29 years old. coaching towards education and employment, developing CV, in-house employment. emerged (see Alvesson & Kärreman, 2007; Alvesson & Sköldberg, 2008). This approach meant that the answers given in the interviews can be compared to larger social issues about activation and gender equality. The analysis of the material is based on thematic analysis where we sorted the mate- rial into categories and themes. First, we sorted the material into descriptive categories. Second, we performed a more selective reading where we coded items based on theory and available research, where the material is ﬁrst entered under different themes and then written up as an analytical draft that includes theoretical concepts (see Bazely, 2009). Third, where patterns relevant to how activa- tion and gender equality are given meaning in the descriptions of managers and staff, these were interlinked with quotes. Fourth, a last check of the analysis was made between the aim and research questions and our results. In this last round no themes dispersed nor were new ones formulated. This abductive process (Alvesson & Kärreman, 2007) generated an overview of the empirical material, and the relationships between the themes could ultimately be met with the theoretical analysis, which led to the overarching themes presented here, and thus the main analysis. This study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board in Uppsala (Reg. no. 2016/173). All respondents in the interviews were informed about the study and that participation was voluntary and have given informed consent. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and stored securely. Results and Analysis To understand how goals of activation and gender equality interact and give meaning in the inter- views, our results and analysis are presented through three logics: the activation logic, the gender equality logic and the hybrid logic of gendered activation. Each logic contains symbols and rituals that maintain the logics as theoretical constructs. What distinguishes the hybrid logic of gen- dered activation is how international migrant women becomes a powerful symbol that upholds and legitimizes the logic. Activation as the Dominant Logic The activation logic is maintained by two symbols. Symbols, as a theoretical concept, are manifested through language and are essential for creating meaning for actors to maintain the logics (Friedland & Parsland and Ulmestig 287 Alford, 1991). As we will show, the symbols are, much like the local activation goals, permeated by a focus on the actions of the unemployed participants rather than the measures of the labor market pro- grams. The ﬁrst symbol is self-sufﬁciency. The social workers interviewed held the goals regarding activation towards self-sufﬁciency in high regard. As one social worker said: “[…] that more people should be self-sufﬁcient in either work or studies. This is probably the foremost policy goal we are pursuing” (SW2W). This sentiment was also expressed by a social worker who was asked what the main political goal for the labor market program is. “Well, it is in line with the work-ﬁrst approach, which is quite apparent. So, you could say that it [the labor market program] is part of the work-ﬁrst approach, I would say. Although it is not explicitly stated, it is” (SW4Z). Acting in accordance with the activation goals seemed to be taken as a given: “The mission is to get them out in some sort of self-sufﬁciency” (SW2Z). Self-sufﬁciency becomes a powerful symbol for the knowledge claim that activation leads to employment, and through that, activation can be understood as a dominant logic that is pri- oritized in the labor market programs (see Friedland & Alford, 1991). Activation is taken for granted as effective, but the staff and managers also choose to prioritize it to a certain degree. The activation goals are closely governed through the ritual of measuring outcomes for the participants: We have a lot of goals, but we have a speciﬁc goal that is stated in the operational plan and that is that 40% [of participants] will go on to work or study, and so that is our numbered goal. That is a pretty high number, 40%, but we are quite close (SW1X). The results from the ritual, expressed as numbers and percentages, become powerful symbols of a job well done: “Yes, we do good things, we have good results […] between 60–70% go on to work and study” (SW4W). Symbols are essential for institutional logics since they create meaning for the actors within the institutionalized ﬁeld (Friedland & Alford, 1991). Symbols carry knowledge claims through place and time, much like the organizational goals do in the four labor market programs when they emphasize that a certain percentage of individuals will become employed (see Meyer, 2008; Tan & Wang, 2011). As these results illustrate, the organizational activation goals have taken hold of the labor market programs, where the ritual of measuring labor market outcomes not only governs the participants, but also the social workers and managers. It is worth noting that there is no similar emphasis from social workers, managers or organizational leadership concern- ing whether the programs meet the goals of gender equality. The second symbol of activation logic is activity, which is closely linked to motivation. Activity becomes a ritual for the participants to prove to the social workers that they are motivated to ﬁnd work: “It’s about getting the motor running, right? This is arranged employment. Then when you [social workers] come in, you help them obviously, but you have to get your own motor running to look for jobs” (SW1X). This illustrates how the social workers perceive the participants to be unmotivated before they arrive to the program. The social workers monitor the participants to see that they are keeping active; as one social worker described: “We see how they work, if they come late and manage time” (SW1Y). The monitoring described in the quote often has a function when activating the unemployed in a way that enhances motivation to activity, enforcing the logic of activation (see Thorén, 2012). The logic of activation is manifested as dominant in the ritualized work within the labor market programs through the rituals and symbols of activation (see Alford & Friedland, 1985; Friedland & Alford, 1991). However, the symbol of activity does not give rise to rituals that accept any kind of activity. Instead, social workers see CV development, applying for jobs and individual coaching as well as guidance towards other welfare-support, as symbols of individual motivation: “But as I said, the main opportunity and chance is an individual match in the labor market” (SW4X). Acting in 288 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) accordance with the activation logic is the individuals’ best chance to become employed. On the other hand, institutions do more than control and constrain, they also empower the behaviour of actors (Scott, 2008). For an instance, one social worker described how a personal goal is consistent with the activation logic; “[…] well, that is my goal. To get as many people out [self-sufﬁcient] as possible, to help both the individual and the community.” (SW 2Y). The personal goal illustrates how actors, through their behaviour and their adherence to norms, embody institutional logics (see Friedland & Alford, 1991). In this sense, activation is clear-cut in terms of how and why participants should be handled. Activation as an institutional logic, manifested through symbols and rituals in the interviewees’ daily work, becomes a dominant truth that guides the actions of social workers and managers within the labor market programs. In what follows, we show how it is hard for a gender equality logic to compete with this dominant logic of activation. Gender Equality as the Subordinate Logic The gender equality logic is maintained by three symbols and is understood as a subordinate logic within the four labor market programs. The ﬁrst symbol was the loose coupling between the orga- nizational goals and the rituals and symbols in the daily work. This means that there is a discrep- ancy between the organization-oriented goals of gender equality and how the social workers and managers describe what they do (Meyer & Rowan, 1977). There is a lack of awareness of gender equality goals among the interviewees. In two of the labor market programs studied, it is unclear if goals of gender equality are a part of the organizational goals, making the goals fuzzy. Furthermore, there is a discrepancy between managers and social workers within the same program. When asked if goals of gender equality govern the program, one manager stated “No, not here” (MZ), while the staff in the same program described how they did in fact work with goals related to gender equality. In another program, the tables were turned. Here, the manager gave explicit details on how gender equality goals were being pursued, while the staff said “no, not here anyway” (SW1X) and “No, not in this team” (SW2X). This illustrates an aspect of the logic of gender equality as a fuzzy logic that is not prioritized in day-to-day work, an aspect that is common in the critique of gender mainstreaming where the focus is on outlining policy goals with little emphasis given to how the policy goals should actually be implemented (Crespi, 2009). The loose coupling was ritualized by a gender-neutral approach that maintained the symbol, such as giving the same service independent of gender and emphasizing individuality, which risked becoming a gender-blind practice. As one social worker described when asked if they worked with particularly vulnerable women by referencing the organizational goals: “[…] we work so actively with everyone so we don’t have to distinguish between men or women, we spend the same time with everyone” (SW2Y). The quote highlights how the gender-neutral approach is ritual- ized within the programs by focusing on individual participants. Furthermore, the gender-neutral approach also risks becoming gender-blind when it assumes that policy outcomes, such as activation, affect men and women the same way and should thus be seen as a gender-equal practice since gender- neutrality is sought (see Crespi, 2009; Vincent & Eveline, 2010). One of the managers acknowledged the complexity of working with a gender-neutral approach and described gender inequality inherent in the service provided to participants: Two-thirds [of participants] are women. But then we have the same problem as everyone else has, we have more women, but we spend more time and … yes more time and money on the men. But that’s the way it is all over. But we are just as bad, unfortunately. But we are working on it. We can see it in the statistics (MX). Parsland and Ulmestig 289 The quote shows how gender equality goals, as a symbol, are loosely coupled to the behaviours and norms within the programs but are not completely invisible, as the managers have chosen to produce statistics on the matter. The interviewees described how gender equality can mean a variety of different things, making the gender equality goals themselves fuzzy and difﬁcult to grasp. The second symbol was that gender equality is a societal issue, which most of the interviewees acknowledged but which also became a bit too abstract to address. For example, in issues relating to the gender segregated labor market, one interviewee noted: “[…] so you have to work … try to get them to make gender norm-breaking choices, broaden perspectives and things like that” (SW5W). This quote from the social worker highlights the fact that the presentation of gender norm- breaking as an option is ritualized, unlike the motivation for activation, which is taken for granted. In other words, the subordinate gender logic is handled as an option. While the knowledge claim of breaking gendered norms is noticeable in the quote, an emphasis is placed on individual choice in doing so. This emphasis on individual choice reoccurs in another quote regarding how gender norm- breaking choices are handled within the programs: […] I think that I personally am not trying to change, but I can inform about what is feasible in society. That you can think what you want but this is the way it is and if you go outside, it can have consequences. I don’t feel like I’m going to change things. I will inform, not change (SW1Z). In the quote, information, rather than change, highlights how the gender equality logic is an option when presented to the participants in the programs. In contrast to the motivation to be active, the par- ticipants have a choice to make gender norm-breaking choices in the labor market, reinforcing the understanding that gender equality logic is a subordinate rather than dominant logic. The third symbol was related to the gender equality perspective as a policy tool, given how the programs reported statistics back to their main administration. A manager described it as follows: We must have the gender equality perspective. It should permeate all of our statistics, and that is what I mean; there are no such ﬁgure targets for a certain number to be enrolled [within the program], but it is more that … more that the gender equality perspective should permeate all statistics, analyses and reports in the operational plan (MY). As the quote shows, unlike activation, gender equality is not measured through statistics, where participant enrolment and program outcomes are measured. Instead, gender-divided statistics are fol- lowed by a gender equality analysis of said statistics, as part of the idea of gender mainstreaming (Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). The gender-divided statistics are non-selectable, but the gender equality analysis seems to have little impact on how the labor market programs are organized or how the activation should be conducted, since there are no compulsory practices for the analysis and the organization of the programs. Hence, there is nothing to ritualize gender equality goals, such as a policy tool that can serve as a signal to decision makers and society as a whole that gender equality is on the agenda. However, this kind of symbolic window dressing does not have to imply the subordination of an institutionalized logic (see Meyer, 2008). Promoting gender equality is interlinked with the Swedish welfare model (Lundqvist, 2017; Martinsson et al., 2016; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). The knowledge claim of a need for gender equality affects what is considered legitimate in the ﬁeld and thus shapes how different organizations act (Dequech, 2008; Suddaby & Greenwood, 2005). The interviews highlight how gender equality goals may be manifested on a societal level but are still subordinate within the labor market programs. As illustrated in the above analysis, the gender equality logic is largely subordinate in relation to the activation logic. We highlight this fact by showing the loose coupling of the organizational gender equality goals in relation to the actions of the social workers and managers. However, the 290 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) two competing logics can also be understood as a hybrid logic (see Reay & Hinings, 2009). In what follows, we illustrate a way to handle both gender equality and activation without creating compe- tition between them. Gendered Activation, a Hybrid Logic that Makes Gender Equality and Activation Non-competitive A convenient way for organizations and their members to manage competing logics is to harmonize these logics or make them ﬁt into one another (see Friedland & Alford, 1991). Theoretically, this can be understood as a hybrid logic where the logic of gender equality is absorbed into activation logic (see Reay & Hinings, 2009). By creating a hybrid logic, the four programs can maintain the knowl- edge claims of activation while supplementing the symbols and knowledge claims of the gender equality logic that provides legitimacy in relation to other actors within the ﬁeld of labor market pro- grams. Here, we present this as three symbols that maintain the hybrid logic of gendered activation. First, paid labor becomes a symbol that enables the hybridization of the gender equality logic and activation, as paid labor is seen as both a possibility for unemployed women to achieve equality and as a goal for activation in itself. It is common that the social workers’ and managers’ reﬂections on gender equality was something mainly made through the labor market. As one manager described: […] We see having work as being equal. Because then you have the power to decide over your life. That is what gender equality is all about. That you have the power to decide how you want to live and what you want to do with your life (MX). The quote coincides with the feminist critique of the welfare state, where work as a commodity is applied exclusively for workers. As such, labor gender equality may be achieved by taking part in paid work (see Sainsbury, 1999). However, this notion does not take into account the gendered dif- ferences in the quality of work, wages and working conditions (Gornick, 1999; Jenson, 2015; Rafnsdóttir & Weight, 2018) nor the unequal division of unpaid labor (Gornick, 1999; Lister, 2009). The symbol of paid labor connects activation and gender equality through the ritualization of spe- ciﬁc measures in activating women. The ritual of activating women was described by a manager as an organizational decision to have a 50/50 balance of women and men as participants and as staff: “So, I felt that I had a little to work with, as a feminist,” since the decision would mean more women being activated towards the labor market. Another labor market program was split into two interventions, one designed for men and one for women, as a way to attract more women to the program: “[…] but the girls do not come here. So therefore … okay what does that mean? Should we start only for girls? Then maybe it will happen. And it did” (MZ). In the male dominated intervention, the participants were employed to do light carpentry and thus, a way for the program to attract more female partic- ipants was to start a catering business that speciﬁcally targeted women, hence following the gender- stereotypical labor market. From the perspective that paid labor is a means to achieve gender equal- ity, the opportunity for women to partake in work as a commodity is increased in the programs even when they follow the structures of the gender-segregated labor market. At the same time, however, the structures of the gender-segregated labor market were actively reproduced in the way the labor market programs were designed for men and women. Further, the gendered reproduction of class was manifested in the training of lower class or working-class women to become childcare workers and men to work as carpenters (cf. Skeggs, 2004). The second symbol was how responsibility for gender equality was placed upon the individual participant rather than the labor market programs. The segregated labor market was discussed by a social worker as follows: Parsland and Ulmestig 291 Generally, I think it’s a huge question. So how should we look at it? In general, there is, of course, a greater issue in breaking structures and changing norms. But is it people who are far from the labor market and who should be in the forefront of it? […] From a gender equality perspective … it is awesome and we all need to help break structures and norms, but if it is a young person for whom it will be a ﬁrst job, or who has not worked for several years, they are the ones who will work at a pre- school … if it is a woman, for example, where she feels conﬁdent and that she feels that she can handle it. Or should she be a janitor? Or … how are we going to look at it? The greater purpose is to enter the labor market, gain a stronger position and become self-sufﬁcient (SW2W). The quote highlights the conﬂict of handling structural issues, such as the gender segregated labor market, with individualized activation. This shows how the responsibility for gender equality in the programs is maintained as a symbol of individual responsibility in the logic of gendered activation. This symbol is also maintained through rituals. The female participants were mainly employed within childcare and other types of care work, while the men were mainly employed as janitors, woodworkers and gardeners. One manager described this as a result of individual choice by the par- ticipants: “But it is also the case that the places we have available are in school kitchens and pre- schools, where women want to be. The men want to become janitors and such” (MX). The quote poses a chicken and an egg situation: is gendered employment provided because of the choice of the participants, or are the participants choosing certain employment because that is what is pro- vided? In either case, there is an emphasis on the individual responsibility of making a choice by following structural norms and social attitudes, or not (Gornick, 1999). While the idea of breaking problematic gendered norms and structures in society may be inherent within the programs, the gen- dered choice of participants becomes a ritual where participants are described as wanting to take gender stereotypical employment and are therefore supported in such choices. The logic of gendered activation is thus dominated by knowledge claims from activation. Some social workers and managers, however, described rituals for how they try to present gender norm breaking choices to participants: “[…] to present different [jobs] and to get some nuance to it as well. So, it’s not so traditional, women should work in preschool and men should work as janitors you know” (SW9W). The quote shows how symbols of gender equality are kept within the gendered activation, which affects the programs. But the quote also highlights how gender stereotypical choices are the responsibility of the participants when the social workers’ and managers’ rituals do not work. As a manager describes, “We work according to the mantra if they don’t want to, then there is no point in trying” (MW). Trying to inﬂuence non-traditional choices becomes a ritual that maintains the logic. What the participants actually choose does not really matter, it is still a symbol of gender equality that an attempt is made, which legitimatizes the program (Tan & Wang, 2011). Women with a background as international migrants were the third symbol. Participants from this heterogeneous group become the perfect target for gendered activation and overall reduced by the social workers to a category that symbolizes the need for gender equality and activation. Friedland and Alford (1991) describe that categories are important knowledge claims for the state to maintain power and legitimacy. Through the metaphor of a country at war, they describe how the construction of “us and them” is almost as important as the actual conquest because it is the con- struction of the enemy that causes the citizens to ﬁght for their country based on how the enemy is portrayed. In our data, the “migrant woman” is a constructed category that manifests the legitimacy for activation in itself, but also as a means to solve gender inequalities. The legitimacy that gendered activation enjoys through the activation of migrant women can be noted in a quote from a social worker in one of the labor market programs. When explaining an obsta- cle in activating migrant women, the interviewee focused on cases when the women are expected to work together with men: 292 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) You know, women from other countries. They are not like the Swedes who dare to say, dare to talk. In [their] family, women are sitting in one room and the man in another room, you know? Women never meet the man like this, go out with them and so on. I remember my ﬁrst year here, a girl asked ‘what should I go out and work with a man?’ I said ‘of course you should do it but you do not go hand in hand you work like this.’ But now they dare to say things and so on (SW3Y). The quote from the social worker highlights an example of putting cultural explanations on social problems, when the unemployment of migrant women is sweepingly understood to be interlinked with the resistance to work alongside a man. However, the quote also highlights the signiﬁcance of migrant women being a symbol for gendered activation, as the construction of the migrant women becomes a dichotomized category to being Swedish, and thus in need of an intervention that can ‘solve’ both unemployment as gender inequalities, hence gendered activation. This notion also connects to how gender equality is seen to be part of Swedish national identity and the image of migrants being inherently patriarchal and lacking interest of gender equality (Hübinette & Lundström, 2014). Gender equality claims become ampliﬁed in relation to helping migrant women who are exposed in the labor market and who are at the same time described as victims of a gender unequal culture. In this way, migrant women thus become a symbol for the hybrid logic of gendered activation. As previous research has pointed out (Larsson, 2015; Martinsson et al., 2016; Mulinari, 2018; Vesterberg, 2016), there is often a paradoxical discourse around migrant women in Swedish labor market policy. On one side, migrant women are victimized and described as exposed due to discrimination: it is like this; many people think when they see the [municipal] website that diversity is a nice thing … but when we come with our Somali women who not only have a hijab but a chador and then it’s ‘nooo … we don’t want that kind of diversity’ (MX). Migrant women are also victimized in relation to the knowledge claim that they are from tradi- tional and unequal cultures, as a manager describes when discussing Somali women: But then it is also that they have a lot of children, that it is very common that they have 5 to 15 children, and then that is what their calling is in life, maybe, and then maybe you never had the idea that you should go out into the labor market because it is not your role, and then it makes it difﬁcult to get out when you have so many [children] too (MY). In contrast to the ﬁndings of Wright Nielsen (2009), Larsson (2015) and Vesterberg (2016), where the victimization of migrant women is interlinked to culture, our ﬁndings show a type of victimiza- tion that is also interlinked to societal dimensions of labor market discrimination. However, the end result still largely matches the ﬁndings of previous research, namely that the gendered activation of migrant women is intended to make them responsible for supporting themselves. This is the other side of the paradoxical discourse around migrant women in Swedish labor market policy: So to say … that you see the family as the provider, which means that you do not have to work unless you want to, the family sends money from all over the world. So, you do not see your responsibility to the state either (MY). As described in the quote, migrant women are also depicted as unwilling to work and hence in need of activation measures to make them more motivated to work. In such cases, their unwillingness is set in relation to the traditional culture of the migrant women, putting a cultural explanation on the social problem that unemployment is for migrant women (cf. Eliassi, 2017). Parsland and Ulmestig 293 In national labor market policy, the unemployment of migrant women has historically been described as a problem for the women themselves as well as a challenge to gender equality in Sweden (Mulinari, 2018). The image of migrant women as problematic and victims of an unequal and patriarchal culture is part of the racialization processes that upholds institutional racism in society, as it enables separation of migrant women and pushes speciﬁc activation interventions upon them (cf. Larsson, 2015). As such, a push for subsidized employment, much like the programs in this study, is described as a means to activate migrant women and thus uphold national ideals of labor market participation and gender equality. To activate migrant women into subsidized employ- ment is thus a ritual that upholds the logic of gendered activation. This is exempliﬁed in the programs by a quote from a manager: It is about people who have to become a part of the labor market and become integrated as well. Partly for ﬁnancial reasons but especially for themselves and their children. There are so many beneﬁts to integra- tion and getting them into the labor market (MY). The quote from the manager highlights why it is important for the programs to target and activate speciﬁc categories of women, here migrant women. The knowledge claim in the labor market pro- grams is that activation of the migrant women is not only beneﬁcial for the individual women who become temporarily employed and can become more ﬁnancially independent, the migrant woman also become a symbol for a wider issue, where integration is equated with labor market participation. The migrant woman as a symbol for gendered activation sheds light on the unequal relation among sub-groups of women. Gender equality, as shown in our result, is mainly understood as a woman’s issue on a societal level. Gendered activation on the other hand becomes manageable and manifested through the symbolization of the migrant woman. By constructing the migrant woman as an ‘other’ who is a victim of her culture but in the same time responsible for her own and her children’s future, migrant women are singled out as speciﬁcally problematic for Swedish society to handle, thus the need for activation. As such, the symbolization of migrant women is an example of the racialization processes that uphold institutional racism and discrimination. Migrant women thus become a very distinct symbol for the logic of gendered activation in this context. Concluding Discussion This study aims to understand how goals of activation and gender equality interact and how acti- vation and gender equality are given meaning in the descriptions of managers and staff in four labor market programs. However, the study has limitations. One is that there are only four pro- grams, which of course does not provide the possibility to generalize the empirical results. Secondly, we are limited to the descriptions of the individuals whom we interviewed. Furthermore, we did not collect demographic information about the interviewees that could have contextualized the results, as for instance, the results of Eliassi (2017) are contextualized. It should also be noted that the analysis is within the frames of the female-male gender binary. Thus, experiences of individuals living outside the gender-binary are not captured. Still, our study gives empirical examples on the connection between institutions and action (see Friedland & Alford, 1991; Reay & Hinings, 2009) and thus the complexity of doing practical social work within a ﬁeld of competing logics. Neo-institutionalists have been criticized for failing to account for gender (see Krook & Mackay, 2011; Popescu Ljungholm, 2017). Our results show that institutional logics can be used theoretically to show how institutions are steeped in gender norms. 294 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) The goals of gender equality and activation that the labor market programs in the study are asked to follow are given different meanings by the interviewees, where gender equality is fuzzy and hard to grasp and activation is more clear-cut. As shown in the Table 2 below, gendered activation as a hybrid logic becomes a way of handling the fuzzy goals of gender equality together with the more clear-cut activation goals. As the table shows, the logic of gender equality is given meaning through the symbols and rituals connected to an organizational and policy level. The activation logic, on the other hand, carries symbols and rituals targeting the unemployed individuals, which is generally consistent with how the organizational goals are modeled. As such, the goals are understood to interact on different levels in the labor market programs but can come together through the logic of gendered activation, where speciﬁc activation measures directed at women in general, and migrant women more specif- ically, encounter knowledge claims of gender equality. In the programs, women are mainly trained to become service providers in low-status and low-wage work, and the responsibility is ﬁrmly placed on them rather than the structures of the labor market or labor market programs. Women with a migrant background are often targeted for gender equality and activation measures in welfare states (Larsson, 2015; Mulinari, 2018). Gendered activation shifts the focus away from questions of gender segregation and discrimination within the labor market programs in terms of how resources are provided and related to the labor market. There are no reasons to doubt the accuracy of the reports of the managers or the social workers. Their understanding is strongly affected by the societal push for activation as a means to solve gender inequalities (see Mulinari, 2018; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). However, Jenson (2015) and Mulinari (2018) point to the risk of categorizing women as ungendered workers, mothers, migrants or otherwise victimized and thus suitable to any form of employment without taking the quality of employment into consideration. This reproduces a segregated labor market where both women and/ or migrants are often already at a disadvantage. The risk that poor people will be directed to low quality jobs is increased by the dual welfare system in Sweden. To be able to establish yourself in the social insurance system, you need an income, regardless of the risk you put yourself in. In the end, gendered activation contains gender equality but is dominated by activation. Knowledge of gender inequality is used but also legitimizes behavior and ideas (see Dequech, 2008; Suddaby & Greenwood, 2005; Tan & Wang, 2011). The legitimacy connects the programs with ideas of gender equality in the welfare state where policy and organizational goals on gender are acknowledged (Lundqvist, 2017; Martinsson et al., 2016; Mulinari, 2018). Gendered activation sheds light on the ambiguity of Swedish gender equality policy, where gender mainstreaming focuses on organizational measures in terms of gender equality analysis Table 2. Overview of Logics, Symbols and Rituals. Logics Symbols Rituals Gender Equality Loose-coupling Gender neutrality A societal issue Gender norm-breaking choices Policy tool Reporting to policy makers Activation Self-sufﬁciency Measuring outcome for the participants Activity Participants being active Gendered activation Paid labor Speciﬁc measures in activating women Individual responsibility Individual choice Migrant women Activating migrant women into subsidized employment Parsland and Ulmestig 295 and reporting gender segregated statistics, but with little attachment to practical gender equality work (cf. Crespi, 2009; Svensson & Gunnarsson, 2012). Based on our study, we argue that gender equality policies need to be implemented in the day-to-day work within organizations, and not only used as an organizational measurement as it otherwise risks being an empty policy with little attachment to the experiences of individuals within the organization. For example, there is a risk that this kind of “empty” gender equality policy will reproduce a bad quality of work or a bad work-life balance for women, rather than supporting equality. Our results provide a critical analysis of the activation logic that suggests that employment is a universal answer to social problems, such as gender inequal- ity. For social workers who ﬁnd themselves implementing activation policies we argue that it is nec- essary to question what activation policy can mean for individuals as well as society at large, especially as activation tends to target marginalized groups who are already exposed. Furthermore, gendered activation illustrates the existence of a loose connection between the claims for gender equality and what is done in the four labor market programs. Here, a policy indi- cation is that our study provides insight into the complexity of using activation to create gender equality, where gender equality becomes strongly connected to the institutional dimensions of gender, class and race. Gender equality was understood by the interviewees to be fuzzy and complex and activation was clear cut and aligned with the work conducted within the programs and “the work-ﬁrst approach.” This was perhaps also connected to the construction of the local goals, where the activation goals were focused on the activation of the participant and the gender equality goals were focused on organizational measures, which were less connected to the daily work of the social workers and managers. Gendered activation may be reasonable on an individual level, where women in long-term unem- ployment can sustain a higher income and thus reach income independence from family members and the welfare state through work (Gornick, 1999; Lister, 2009). However, in the context of the gender segregated labor market and a situation where access to different types of work is still unequal, gendered activation reproduces gendered inequalities. Here, the results of our study align with scholars who have highlighted how the increasing interest in activation policy among welfare states overshadows claims of gender equality, where the gender equality goals become no-matter-what employment rather than employment leading to equal outcomes (Crespi, 2009; Jenson, 2015; Mulinari, 2018). Lastly, gendered activation also sheds light on the unequal relationship between sub-groups of women. Here, our study shows how gender equality and activation is applied differently on migrant women. The issue of unemployment is given cultural explanations when it regards migrant women and how the migrant women symbolizes an ‘other’ in need of activation (cf. Mulinari, 2018; Vesterberg, 2015). While the interviewees in our empirical material did not give voice to clear claims of racial discrimination in terms of treating participants differently based on race, our material points to an example of the systemic reproduction of racist discourse within social and labor market policies (Mulinari, 2018). To gain more knowledge on how racist discourses are further operationalized, a more in-depth analysis of the day-to-day activation is needed. In rela- tion to this, it is also paramount to include the experiences of individuals being activated to deepen our understanding of the complex processes of inequalities and discrimination. Declaration of Conﬂicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conﬂicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publica- tion of this article. Funding This work was supported by Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (grant number 2016-07123). 296 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) ORCID iD Ellen Parsland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1569-8582 Notes 1. We use logic, institutional logic and competing institutional logic synonymously throughout the text. 2. By international migrants we mean individuals who have experienced an international migration process. i.e., a permanent change of residence that means a moving across nation borders and that is politically distinct from internal migration (see Dahinden, 2016). 3. https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/co/CEDAW.C.SWE.CO.7.pdf References Acker, J. (2009). From glass ceiling to inequality regimes. Sociologie du Travail, 51(2), 199–207. https://doi. org/10.4000/sdt.16407 Acker, J. (2011). Theorizing gender, race, and class in organizations. In E. L. Jeanes, D. Knights, & P. Yancey Martin (Eds.), Handbook of gender, work and organization (pp. 65-80). Wiley. Alford, R. R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state, and democracy. Cambridge University Press. Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265–1281. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586822 Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2008). Tolkning och reﬂektion: vetenskapsﬁlosoﬁ och kvalitativ metod. Lund. Angelov, N., Johansson, P., & Lindahl, E. (2013). Det envisa könsgapet i inkomster och löner: hur mycket kan förklaras av skillnader i familjeansvar? Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU). Bazely, P. (2009). Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes’. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 6–22. Bursell, M. (2012). Ethnic discrimination, name change and labor market inequality: Mixed approaches to ethnic exclusion in Sweden. acta universitatis stockholmiensis. Calmfors, L., Forslund, A., & Hemström, M. (2002). Does active labour market policy work?: Lessons from the Swedish experiences. Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU). Clasen, J., Clegg, D., & Goerne, A. (2016). Comparative social policy analysis and active labour market policy: Putting quality before quantity. Journal of Social Policy, 45(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0047279415000434 Collins, H. P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge. Crenshaw, K. (1991, July). Mapping the margins. Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 Crespi, I. (2009). Gender differences and equality issues in Europe: Critical aspects of gender mainstreaming policies. International Review of Sociology, 19(1), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700802614010 Dahinden, J. (2016). A plea for the ‘de-migranticization’ of research on migration and integration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(13), 2207–2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129 Dequech, D. (2008). Logics of justiﬁcation and logics of action. Journal of Economic Issues, 42(2), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507162 Edebalk, P. G., & Olsson, M. (2010). Poor relief, taxes and the ﬁrst universal pension reform: The origin of the Swedish welfare state reconsidered. Scandinavian Journal of History, 35(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/10. 1080/03468755.2010.491635 Eliassi, B. (2015). Constructing cultural otherness within the Swedish welfare state: The cases of social workers in Sweden. Qualitative Social Work, 14(4), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014559091 Eliassi, B. (2017). Conceptions of immigrant integration and racism among social workers in Sweden. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 28(1), 6–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2017.1249242 Parsland and Ulmestig 297 Fahlgren, S. (2013). The paradox of a gender-balanced workforce: The discursive construction of gender among Swedish social workers. Afﬁlia, 28(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109912475162 Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional change. In W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago University Press. Geldof, D. (1999). New activation policies: Promises and risks. In Linking welfare and work (pp. 13–26). European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Gerﬁn, M., & Lechner, M. (2002). A microeconometric evaluation of the active labour market policy in Switzerland. The Economic Journal, 112(482), 854–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00072 Giddens, A. (2013). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. John Wiley & Sons. Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the critics’ corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authen- ticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1031–1055. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00531.x Gornick, C. J. (1999). Gender equality in the labour market. In D. Sainsbury (Ed.), Gender and welfare state regimes (pp. 210-242). Oxford University Press. Government Ofﬁces of Sweden. (2016). Sveriges återkommande rapportering om efterlevnaden av CEDAW. Retrieved June 30, 2020 from https://www.regeringen.se/internationella-mr-granskningar-av-sverige/2014/ 09/sveriges-aterkommande-rapportering-om-efterlevnaden-av-cedaw/ Gubrium, J. F., Holstein, J. A., Marvasti, A. B., & McKinney, K. D. (Eds.). (2012). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. Sage Publications. Hansen, C. H. (2018). Recognition and gendered identity constructions in labour activation. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12294 Herbst, A., & Benjamin, O. (2016). Between activation and supporting women alternative operation of welfare-to-work programs. Social Policy & Administration, 50(5), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol. Hernes, H. (1987). Welfare state and women power: Essays in state feminism. Universitetsforlaget. Hübinette, T., Hörnfeldt, H., Farahani, F., & León Rosales, R. (2012). Om ras och vithet i det samtida Sverige. Mångkulturellt centrum. Hübinette, T., & Lundström, C. (2014). Three phases of hegemonic whiteness: Understanding racial temporal- ities in Sweden. Social Identities, 20(6), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2015.1004827 Hussénius, K. (2019). Intersectional patterns of social assistance eligibility in Sweden. Nordic Social Work Research, 11(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2019.1601636 Hvinden, B. (1999). Activation: A Nordic perspective. In Linking welfare and work (pp. 27–42). European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Jacobsson, K., Hollertz, K., & Garsten, C. (2017). Local worlds of activation: The diverse pathways of three Swedish municipalities. Nordic Social Work Research, 7(2), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X. 2016.1277255 Jenson, J. (2015). The fading goal of gender equality: Three policy directions that underpin the resilience of gen- dered socio-economic inequalities. Social Politics, 22(44), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv035 Jessen, J. T., & Tufte, P. A. (2014). Discretionary decision-making in a changing context of activation policies and welfare reforms. Journal of Social Policy, 43(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000998 Jones, A. (2012). Welfare reform and labour market activation. Local Economy, 27(5-6), 431–448. https://doi. org/10.1177/0269094212454408 Knocke, W. (2001). Integration or segregation? Immigrant populations facing the labor market in Sweden. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 21(3), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X00213005 Krook, M. L., & Mackay, F. (2011). Introduction: Gender, politics and institutions. In M. L. Krook & F. Mackay (Eds.), Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism (pp. 1–20). Palgrave Macmillan. Kullberg, C. (2004). Work and social support: Social workers’ assessments of male and female clients’ problems and needs. Afﬁlia, 19(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109903262759 298 Afﬁlia: Journal of Women and Social Work 37(2) Larsson, K. J. (2015). Integrationen och arbetets marknad: Hur jämställdhet, arbete och annat “svenskt” görs av arbetsförmedlare och privata aktörer [Doctoral disseration]. Linköping: Linköpings universitet. Lister, R. (2009, Summer). A Nordic nirvana? Gender, citizenship, and social justice in the Nordic welfare states. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 16(2), 242–278. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/sp/jxp007 Lødemel, I. (1997). The welfare paradox: Income maintenance and personal social services in Norway and Britain, 1946–1966. Scandinavian University Press. Lødemel, I., & Moreira, A. (2014). Activation or workfare? Governance and the neo-liberal convergence. Oxford University Press. Lundqvist, Å. (2017). Transforming gender and family relations: How active labour market policies shaped the dual earner model. Edward Elgar Publishing. March, J. G., & Olsen, P. J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. Free Press. Martinsson, L., Grifﬁn, G., & Giritli Nygren, K. (2016). Challenging the myth of gender equality in Sweden. Policy Press. Mehrotra, G. (2010). Toward a continuum of intersectionality theorizing for feminist social work scholarship. Afﬁlia, 25(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109910384190 Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 Meyer, R. E. (2008). New sociology of knowledge: Historical legacy and contributions to current debates in institutional research. In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 519–538). London: Sage. Midtbøen, H. A., & Teigen, M. (2014). Social investment in gender equality? Changing perspectives on work and welfare in Norway. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22(4), 267–282. https:// doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2014.964647 Morgen, S., Acker, J., & Weigt, M. J. (2013). Stretched thin: Poor families, welfare work and welfare reform. Cornell University Press. Mulinari, P. (2018). A new service class in the public sector? The role of femonationalism in unemployment policies. Social Inclusion, 6(4), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i4.1575 Nybom, J. (2013). Activation and ‘coercion’ among Swedish social assistance claimants with different work barriers and socio-demographic characteristics: What is the logic? International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00858.x Panican, A., & Johansson, H. (2016). Strategies against poverty in a social democratic local welfare system: Still the responsibility of public actors? In A. Panican & H. Johansson (Eds.), Combating poverty in local welfare systems (pp. 155–177). Palgrave Macmillan. Popescu Ljungholm, D. (2017). Feminist institutionalism revisited: The gendered features of the norms, rules, and routines operating within institutions. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 7(1), 248–254. https://doi. org/10.22381/JRGS7120179 Raffass, T. (2017). Demanding activation. Journal of Social Policy, 46(2), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S004727941600057X Rafnsdóttir, L. G., & Weight, J. (2018). Addressing the horizontal gender division of labour: A case study of support and obstacles in a heavy industry plant in Iceland. Sex Roles, 80(1-2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11199-018-0915-7 Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(06), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803 Rueda, D. (2015). The state of the welfare state: Unemployment, labor market policy, and inequality in the age of workfare. Comparative Politics, 47(3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041515814709275 Sager, M., & Mulinari, D. (2018). Safety for whom? Exploring femonationalism and care-racism in Sweden. Women’s Studies International Forum, 68(2018), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.12.002 Parsland and Ulmestig 299 Sainsbury, D. (1999). Gender and social democratic welfare states. In D. Sainsbury (Ed.), Gender and welfare state regimes (pp. 75-114). Oxford University Press. Salonen, T. (1993). Margins of welfare. A study of modern functions of social assistance. Hällestad Press. Kristianstad Boktryckeri. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Sage. Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. Routledge. Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. University of Chicago Press. Statistics Sweden. (2020). 30 största yrkerna. https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/ arbetsmarknad/sysselsattning-forvarvsarbete-och-arbetstider/yrkesregistret-med-yrkesstatistik/pong/tabell-och- diagram/30-storsta-yrkena/ Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35 Svensson, E.-M., & Gunnarsson, Å. (2012). Gender equality in the Swedish welfare state. feminists@law, 2(1), 1–27. Swedish National Mediation Ofﬁce. (2020). Löneskillnaden mellan kvinnor och män 2019, vad säger den ofﬁ- ciella lönestatistiken? https://www.mi.se/publikationer/loneskillnaden-ar-2019/ Tan, J., & Wang, L. (2011). MNC strategic responses to ethical pressure: An institutional logic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0553-7 Thorén, K. (2008). “Activation policy in action”: A street-level study of social assistance in the Swedish welfare state. Växjö University Press. Thorén, K. (2012). Kommunal arbetsmarknadspolitik – en kunskapsöversikt över åtgärder för arbetslösa social- bidragstagare. Rapporter från riksdagen 2011/12:RFR 14, Arbetsmarknadsutskottet AU, Del 2. Riksdagstryckeriet. Thornton, P., Jones, C., & Kury, K. (2005). Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: Transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing. In C. Jones & P. Thornton (Eds.), Transformation in cultural industries (research in the sociology of organizations, vol. 23) (pp. 125–170). London: JAI. Ulmestig, R., & Marston, G. (2015). Street-level perceptions of procedural rights for young unemployed people– a comparative study between Sweden and Australia. Social Policy & Administration, 49(3), 394–411. https:// doi.org/10.1111/spol.12085 Vernby, K., & Dancygier, R. (2018). Etniska hierarkier och diskriminering på arbetsmarknaden: Resultat från ett faktoriellt fältexperiment. IFAU – institutet för arbetsmarknads- och utbildningspolitisk utvärdering. Vesterberg, V. (2015). Learning to be Swedish: Governing migrants in labor-market projects. Studies in Continuing Education, 37(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1043987 Vesterberg, V. (2016). Ethnicizing employability: Governing the unemployed in labour market projects in Sweden [Doctoral dissertation]. Linköping University. Vincent, K., & Eveline, J. (2010). The invisibility of gendered power relations in domestic violence policy. In C. L. Bacchi & J. Eveline (Eds.), Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory (pp. 215- 236). University of Adelaide Press. Wolgast, S., Molina, I., & Gardell, M. (2018). Antisvart rasism och diskriminering på arbetsmarknaden (Vol. 21). Länsstyrelsen. Wright Nielsen, T. (2009). Viljen til at frigøre. En undersøgelse af empowerment i praksis. Socialhögskolan, Lunds universitet.

Journal

Affilia – SAGE

Published: May 1, 2022

Keywords: activation; gender equality; social work practice; Swedish welfare state; women in poverty

Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Gendered Activation at the Expense of Gender Equality? Activation and Gender Equality as Competing Logics in the Swedish Welfare State

Gendered Activation at the Expense of Gender Equality? Activation and Gender Equality as Competing Logics in the Swedish Welfare State

Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Gendered Activation at the Expense of Gender Equality? Activation and Gender Equality as Competing Logics in the Swedish Welfare State

Gendered Activation at the Expense of Gender Equality? Activation and Gender Equality as Competing Logics in the Swedish Welfare State

References (86)

Abstract

Journal

Recommended Articles

There are no references for this article.

Our policy towards the use of cookies