Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Lindley, A. Smith (1972)
Bayes Estimates for the Linear ModelJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 34
N. Frederiksen, S. Melville (1953)
Differential Predictability in the Use of Test ScoresEducational and Psychological Measurement, 14
M. Novick, C. Lewis, P. Jackson (1973)
The estimation of proportions inm groupsPsychometrika, 38
M. Tatsuoka, F. Lord, M. Novick, A. Birnbaum (1971)
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66
Tom Leonard (1974)
Comment on ‘the estimation of proportions in m groups’Psychometrika, 39
S. Zedeck (1971)
Problems with the use of "moderator" variables.Psychological Bulletin, 76
M. Novick, P. Jackson (1969)
Bayesian Guidance TechnologyReview of Educational Research, 40
R. Lissitz, L. Schoenfeldt (1974)
Moderator Subgroups for the Estimation of Educational Performance: A Comparison of Prediction Models.American Educational Research Journal, 11
(1973)
Educational decisions with limited information
P. Jackson, M. Novick, Dorothy Thayer (1971)
ESTIMATING REGRESSIONS IN m GROUPSBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 24
D. Saunders (1956)
Moderator Variables in PredictionEducational and Psychological Measurement, 16
M. Novick, P. Jackson, Dorothy Thayer, N. Cole (1972)
ESTIMATING MULTIPLE REGRESSIONS IN m GROUPS: A CROSS‐VALIDATION STUDYBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25
American Educational Research Journal Winter 1974, Vol 11, No. 1, Pp. 77-85 Further Cross-Validation Analysis of the Bayesian m-Group Regression Method* MELVIN R. NOVICK American College Testing Program PAUL H. JACKSON University College of Wales, Aberystwyth Novick, Jackson, Thayer, and Cole (1972) conducted a cross-validation study of the Bayesian m-group regression method developed by Jackson, Novick, and Thayer (1971) based on a theory described in Lindley and Smith (1972). The context of this cross validation was the use of ACT Assessment Scores to predict first semester grade point averages in traditional junior colleges. Within-group least squares regression lines were calculated in each of 22 carefully selected, academically oriented junior colleges using 1968 data and these lines were used for prediction on 1969 data. The principal focus of accuracy of prediction was on the average over colleges of the mean-squared errors when the predictions for persons were compared with their actual attained grade point averages. The primary conclusions of the study were based on a 25% within-college sample. The sample sizes ranged from 26 to 184. The average, over the 22 colleges, of the mean-squared errors for the within-college regression was .62. This represents the average result to be expected
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Nov 23, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.