Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Factors Influencing Design of Dynamic Reactive Power Compensation for an Offshore Wind Farm

Factors Influencing Design of Dynamic Reactive Power Compensation for an Offshore Wind Farm This paper investigates factors that influence the design of dynamic reactive power compensation (DRPC) for an offshore wind farm consisting of fixed-speed wind turbines. Several influencing factors are considered including DRPC device types and locations, network strength, and fault ride-through (FRT) capability of individual wind turbines in the wind farm. The DRPC alternatives discussed in this paper comprise of a STATCOM and an SVC. It is found that the exclusion of wind turbine FRT capability results in too large DRPC size estimation. In the case of wind turbines equipped with FRT capability, it was found that the investment cost for both STATCOM and SVC options are comparable. The study also emphasizes the necessity of performing dynamic analysis to correctly design the size and location of the DRPC device. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Wind Engineering SAGE

Factors Influencing Design of Dynamic Reactive Power Compensation for an Offshore Wind Farm

Wind Engineering , Volume 33 (3): 13 – May 1, 2009

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/factors-influencing-design-of-dynamic-reactive-power-compensation-for-dKpXB6iMP2

References (9)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2009 SAGE Publications
ISSN
0309-524X
eISSN
2048-402X
DOI
10.1260/0309-524X.33.3.273
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper investigates factors that influence the design of dynamic reactive power compensation (DRPC) for an offshore wind farm consisting of fixed-speed wind turbines. Several influencing factors are considered including DRPC device types and locations, network strength, and fault ride-through (FRT) capability of individual wind turbines in the wind farm. The DRPC alternatives discussed in this paper comprise of a STATCOM and an SVC. It is found that the exclusion of wind turbine FRT capability results in too large DRPC size estimation. In the case of wind turbines equipped with FRT capability, it was found that the investment cost for both STATCOM and SVC options are comparable. The study also emphasizes the necessity of performing dynamic analysis to correctly design the size and location of the DRPC device.

Journal

Wind EngineeringSAGE

Published: May 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.