Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Houle (1972)
The design of education
G. Boldt (2006)
Resistance, loss and love in learning to read: A psychoanalytic inquiryResearch in The Teaching of English, 40
(1989)
Planning in the face ofpower
(1998)
Designing powerful training: The sequential-iterative model
R. Tyler (1969)
Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction
H. Moore (2007)
Student Resistance in Sociology Classrooms: Tools for Learning and Teaching, 23
D. Laird (1978)
Approaches to Training and Development
J. Isaac (1988)
Power and Marxist Theory: A Realist View
R. Cervero, Arthur Wilson (2005)
Working the Planning Table: Negotiating Democratically for Adult, Continuing, and Workplace Education
Nancy Burroughs, P. Kearney, T. Plax (1989)
Compliance‐resistance in the college classroomCommunication Education, 38
C. Schneier (1994)
The training and development sourcebook
G. Salaman, J. Butler (1990)
Why Managers Won'T LearnManagement Learning, 21
D. Walker (1989)
Fundamentals of Curriculum: Passion and Professionalism
S. Hogan (1994)
Planning Responsibly for Adult Education: A Guide to Negotiating Power and Interests
(2009)
Curriculum and aims (5th ed.)
M. Knowles (1970)
The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy
J. Atherton (1999)
Resistance to learning: a discussion based on participants in in-service professional training programmesJournal of Vocational Education & Training, 51
(1975)
Negotiating curriculum change in a college of education
(2004)
The three dimensions of learning: Contemporary learning theory in the tension field between the cognitive, the emotional, and the socialJournal of adult and continuing education, 10
J. Correll (1994)
How to get top management support for MRP (materiel requirements planning) II.Hospital materiel management quarterly, 15 4
(1992)
Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach
D. Kirkpatrick (1985)
How to Manage Change Effectively: Approaches, Methods, and Case Examples
Facilitator as Mediator: Mediating the Tension between Management and Employee-Learners he political context of and Wilson (1994, 2005) have made Tcurriculum and program it a centerpiece in their work. In the development was acknowledged at examination of planning as a process least as early as 1949 by R.W. Taylor, in which multiple parties with many who, in his seminal work on cur- disparate interests are present, the riculum, briefly acknowledged the planner must work to negotiate political nature of curriculum design. those interests so that successful and Contemporary scholars have been effective programs are produced and much more direct in acknowledging provided. This paper builds on this power differentials and politics in the concept of negotiation and provides a planning process (Houle, 1976; Shaw, more narrowly focused framework for 1975; Walker &Soltis, 2009). Perhaps negotiating content-related political none has provided such a blunt and dynamics within workplace training useful guide to navigating the often settings. difficult political environment of While remaining consistent with program planning as Cervero and this scholarship, the Facilitator as Wilson (1994, 2005). These authors Mediator (FAM) model is distinct in go a long way toward illuminating at least three ways. First, it focuses on By
Adult Learning – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.