Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Singer (1980)
Commentary: Sight Word Learning with and without Pictures: A Critique of Arlin, Scott, and Webster's Research.Reading Research Quarterly, 15
M. Maxwell (1971)
Results of the Survey of the Literature on Methods and Materials in Reading.
D. Richgels (1982)
Schema Theory, Linguistic Theory, and Representations of Reading ComprehensionJournal of Educational Research, 76
Cathy Pine, G. Bieger (1980)
Methodological Issues in Research Involving Pictures and Texts.
C. Glenn (1978)
The role of episodic structure and of story length in children's recall of simple storiesJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17
J. Jenkins, Darlene Pany (1978)
Teaching Reading Comprehension in the Middle Grades
L. Nilsson (1979)
Perspectives on memory research
C. Chalmers, R. Bock (1978)
Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research
M. Wittrock, Carolyn Marks, Marleen Doctorow (1975)
Reading as a Generative Process.Journal of Educational Psychology, 67
W. Kintsch, Douglas Vipond (1979)
Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory
James Rye, Pearl Sjölander (1982)
Readability: the importance of the childLiteracy, 16
K. Perera (1980)
The Assessment of Linguistic Difficulty in Reading MaterialEducational Review, 32
S. Samuels (1970)
Effects of Pictures on Learning to Read, Comprehension and AttitudesReview of Educational Research, 40
L. Manelis, Frank Vekovich (1976)
Repetitions of propositional arguments in sentencesJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15
Mandler JeanM. (1978)
A code in the node: The use of a story schema in retrievalDiscourse Processes, 1
J. Mandler, N. Johnson (1977)
Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recallCognitive Psychology, 9
W. Popham (1969)
3: Curriculum MaterialsReview of Educational Research, 39
R. Spiro (1979)
Etiology of reading comprehension style
W. Kintsch, E. Kozminsky, W. Streby, G. McKoon, J. Keenan (1975)
Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variablesJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14
J. Carroll, R. Freedle (1972)
Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge
M. Tatsuoka (1973)
9: Multivariate Analysis in Educational ResearchReview of Research in Education, 1
M. Eash (1977)
Curriculum Scholarship: Needed Research and Development for the Creation of Instructional Materials.
N. Stein, T. Nezworski (1978)
The effects of organization and instructional set on story memoryDiscourse Processes, 1
Ann Brown (1975)
Recognition, Reconstruction, and Recall of Narrative Sequences by Preoperational Children.Child Development, 46
A. McCabe, C. Peterson (1984)
What makes a good storyJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13
N. Gage (1976)
The Psychology of teaching methods
S. Tatham (1970)
Reading Comprehension of Materials Written With Select Oral Language Patterns: A Study at Grades Two and Four.Reading Research Quarterly, 5
R. Schank (1981)
Reading and Understanding: Teaching from the Perspective of Artificial Intelligence
The present study evaluated pre-primer basal reading materials using theJohnson and Mandler (1980)story grammar. Three stories from two widely used series were selected and rewritten in accord with the rules of the story grammar. Subjects were 96 first graders who were seen individually and randomly assigned to one of eight conditions. The eight conditions were formed by a 2 × 2 × 2 crossed design. Each of the three conditions in the design had two levels as follows: (a) The story version condition was either story grammar story or basal reader story; (b) the picture condition was either pictures present or pictures absent; and (c) the presentation condition was either oral reading or listening to a tape recording. The following conclusions were drawn: (a) Children who read or listened to story grammar stories had better recall than children who read or listened to basal reader stories; (b) the recall for stories with pictures was not different from the recall for stories with no pictures, with the exception that when pictures were present there were more logical additions to the stories than when pictures were absent; (c) children who listened to stories had better recall on some aspects of recall than children who read stories; and (d) there were no significant differences between the story grammar and basal reader versions on words read per second, words skipped, or reading errors during oral reading.
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Jun 23, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.