Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Blocker, D. Eckberg (1989)
Environmental issues as women’s issues: General concerns and local hazards
P. Slovic (1997)
Public Perception of RiskJournal of Environmental Health, 59
L. Hamilton (1985)
Who Cares about Water Pollution? Opinions in a Small‐Town Crisis*Sociological Inquiry, 55
P. Slovic (1987)
Perception of risk.Science, 236 4799
B. Chapman (1971)
Concern about the environmentPhysics Bulletin, 22
D. Payne, R. Newman (2005)
United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice
D. Umberson (1993)
Sociodemographic position, world views, and psychological distressSocial Science Quarterly, 74
J. Flynn, P. Slovic, C. Mertz (1994)
Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 14 6
N. Neil, T. Malmfors, P. Slovic (1992)
Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical RisksToxicologic Pathology, 22
P. Mohai, Bunyan Bryant (1998)
Is There a "Race" Effect on Concern for Environmental Quality?Public Opinion Quarterly, 62
M. Steger, Stephanie Witt (1989)
Gender Differences in Environmental Orientations: a Comparison of Publics and Activists in Canada and the U.SPolitical Research Quarterly, 42
B. Szerszynski (1999)
Risk and Trust: The Performative DimensionEnvironmental Values, 8
S. Funtowicz, J. Ravetz (1992)
Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science
S. Krimsky, D. Golding (1992)
Social Theories of Risk
P. Slovic, T. Malmfors, C. Mertz, N. Neil, I. Purchase (1997)
Evaluating chemical risks: results of a survey of the British Toxicology SocietyHuman & Experimental Toxicology, 16
C. Palmer (2003)
Risk perception: Another look at the 'white male' effectHealth, Risk & Society, 5
(2005)
Toxic Exposure and Environmental Justice: Toward a Spatial Model of Physical Health and Psychological Well-Being.’
R. Jones, L. Carter (1994)
Concern for the environment among black Americans: an assessment of common assumptionsSocial Science Quarterly, 75
R. Barke, H. Jenkins‐Smith, P. Slovic (1997)
Risk perceptions of men and women scientistsSocial Science Quarterly, 78
Melissa Finucane, P. Slovic, C. Mertz, J. Flynn, Terre Satterfield (2000)
Gender, race, and perceived risk: The 'white male' effectHealth, Risk & Society, 2
R. O'connor, R. Bord, A. Fisher (1999)
Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate ChangeRisk Analysis, 19
T. Arcury, Susan. Scollay, T. Johnson (1987)
Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge: The case of acid rainSex Roles, 16
D. Kahan, Donald Braman, John Gastil, P. Slovic, C. Mertz (2005)
Gender, Race, and Risk Perception: The Influence of Cultural Status Anxiety
R. Jones (2002)
BLACKS JUST DON'T CARE: UNMASKING POPULAR STEREOTYPES ABOUT CONCERN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANSInternational Journal of Public Administration, 25
R. Jones, S. Rainey (2006)
Examining Linkages between Race, Environmental Concern, Health, and Justice in a Highly Polluted Community of ColorJournal of Black Studies, 36
J. Alper (1993)
The Pipeline Is Leaking Women All the Way AlongScience, 260
(2004)
The Mobile Area: Mercury Pollution Hotspot.
(1986)
Opinion on the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant: The Effects of Situation and Socialization.
Brent Marshall, J. Picou, C. Bevc (2005)
Ecological Disaster as Contextual TransformationEnvironment and Behavior, 37
D. Davidson, Wiluam Freudenburg (1996)
Gender and Environmental Risk ConcernsEnvironment and Behavior, 28
R. Bullard (1983)
Solid waste sites and the black Houston community.Sociological inquiry, 53 2-3
J. Picou, Brent Marshall, D. Gill (2004)
Disaster, Litigation, and the Corrosive CommunitySocial Forces, 82
P. Slovic (1999)
Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment BattlefieldRisk Analysis, 19
V. Gecas, Michael Schwalbe (1983)
Beyond the looking-glass self: social structure and efficacy-based self-esteem.Social psychology quarterly, 46 2
T. Hoban, E. Woodrum, R. Czaja (1992)
Public opposition to genetic engineering.Rural sociology, 57 4
Lawrence Solomon, Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, B. Risman (1989)
The gender gap and nuclear power: Attitudes in a politicized environmentSex Roles, 21
L. Tognacci, Russell Weigel, M. Wideen, D. Vernon (1972)
Environmental QualityEnvironment and Behavior, 4
(2002)
Race, Gender, and Environmentalism: The Atypical Values and Beliefs of White Men.
Brent K. (2004)
Gender, Race, and Perceived Environmental Risk: The “White Male” Effect in Cancer Alley, LASociological Spectrum, 24
Terre Satterfield, C. Mertz, P. Slovic (2004)
Discrimination, Vulnerability, and Justice in the Face of RiskRisk Analysis, 24
P. Stern, Thomas Dietz, G. Guagnano (1995)
The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological ContextEnvironment and Behavior, 27
S. Klineberg, M. Mckeever, B. Rothenbach (1998)
Demographic predictors of environmental concern: it does make a difference how its measured.Social Science Quarterly, 79
R. Bord, R. O'connor (1997)
The gender gap in environmental attitudes : The case of perceived vulnerability to risk : Research on the environmentSocial Science Quarterly, 78
(1983)
Siting of Hazardous Waste, Landfills, and Their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities
W. Bruin, P. Fischbeck, Neil Stiber, Baruch Fischhoff (2002)
What Number is “Fifty‐Fifty”?: Redistributing Excessive 50% Responses in Elicited ProbabilitiesRisk Analysis, 22
(2000)
Mercury Research Strategy. Office of Research and Development
R. Jones (1998)
Black concern for the environment: Myth versus realitySociety & Natural Resources, 11
B. Johnson (2002)
Gender and Race in Beliefs about Outdoor Air PollutionRisk Analysis, 22
Recent research in the United States reveals that although men are more accepting of risk than women, and Whites more accepting of risks than non-whites, more notable patterns lie at the intersection of race and gender. Evidence of the white male effect has been found in both national and local samples. The present study examines the environmental risk perceptions of deep-South coastal residents in counties adjacent to Mobile Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. These areas are characterized by heavy industrial pollution and significant airborne mercury fallout, resulting in numerous health advisories regarding fish consumption. The analysis supports a growing body of literature that finds, compared to other race-gender groups, white males are more accepting of environmental risks, especially those risks posing a threat to human health and safety. The significance of the white male effect for policy and future applied risk research are discussed, and suggestions for future research are presented.
Journal of Applied Sociology – SAGE
Published: Sep 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.