Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Elizabeth Bernhardt, H. Mandl, N. Stein, T. Trabasso (1988)
Learning and comprehension of textThe Modern Language Journal, 72
G. Salomon (1990)
Studying the flute and the orchestra: controlled vs. classroom research on computersInternational Journal of Educational Research, 14
Enhancing Writing-Related Metacognitions
Word processing. Can it make even good writers better? Electronic Learning
(1984)
Images, plans, and prose: The representation of meaning in writing
(1982)
Computers and the composing process: An examination of computer-writer interaction
A. Sappington (1990)
Recent psychological approaches to the free will versus determinism issue.Psychological Bulletin, 108
J. Hayes, L. Flower (1986)
Writing Research and the Writer.American Psychologist, 41
G. Salomon (1990)
Cognitive Effects With and Of Computer TechnologyCommunication Research, 17
(1984)
Factors influencing self-assessing and revising by college freshmen
(1980)
Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. National Assessment of Educational Progress
(1983)
The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children's composing
D. Murray (1968)
A writer teaches writing
(1980)
Writing Achievement, 1969-79: Results from the third national writing assessment (Vol
C. Daiute, John Kruidenier (1985)
A self-questioning strategy to increase young writers' revising processesApplied Psycholinguistics, 6
N. Sommers (1980)
Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers.College Composition and Communication, 31
(1986)
The union of thought and language in children's private speech
L. Cronbach, R. Snow (1977)
Aptitude and instructional methods
M. Scardamalia, C. Bereiter, R. McLean, J. Swallow, Earl Woodruff (1989)
Computer-Supported Intentional Learning EnvironmentsJournal of Educational Computing Research, 5
(1989)
Inducing evaluative strategies in a classroom context
G. Salomon, D. Perkins (1989)
Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanism of a Neglected PhenomenonEducational Psychologist, 24
M. Wittrock (1986)
Handbook of research on teaching
R. Beach, L. Bridwell (1984)
New directions in composition research
H. Burns, G. Culp (1980)
Stimulating Invention in English Composition through Computer-Assisted Instruction.Educational Technology archive, 20
(1986)
Learning to say what you mean: Toward a psychology of literacy
C. Bereiter, M. Scardamalia (1987)
The psychology of written composition
M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, Ellen Souberman (1978)
Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes
Hayes (1980)
identifying the organization of wi iiing processes
R. Glaser (1978)
Advances in Instructional Psychology
J. Bean, Joseph Lawlor (1983)
Computers in Composition InstructionCollege Composition and Communication, 34
(1984)
Information processing demand of text composition
(1988)
Artificial intelligence in reverse: Computer tools that turn cognitive
(1983)
Holistic assessment of writing: Experimental design and cognitive theory
D. Perkins (1985)
The Fingertip Effect: How Information-Processing Technology Shapes ThinkingEducational Researcher, 14
C. Daiute (1985)
Writing and Computers
S. Brehm, J. Brehm (1981)
Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control
M. Chi, P. Feltovich, R. Glaser (1981)
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and NovicesCogn. Sci., 5
Susan Florio-Ruane, Saundra Dunn (1985)
Teaching Writing: Some Perennial Questions and Some Possible Answers. Occasional Paper No. 85.
G. Salomon, T. Globerson, Eva Guterman (1989)
The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a Reading Partner.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81
(1982)
From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process
The main purpose of this study was to test the general hypothesis that ongoing computerized procedural facilitation with strategies and writing-related metacognitions during writing improves learners’ writing while being helped, as well as leaves a cognitive residue in the form of subsequently improved writing, once that help is removed. Three groups of 20 ninth to eleventh graders participated in the study. One group wrote five essays while being guided by unsolicited continuous metacognitive-like guides presented by a specially designed computer tool (the Writing Partner); a second group received the same guidance but only upon the writer’s voluntary solicitation; and the third group received no guidance and wrote with only a word processor (control group). The study’s main hypothesis was confirmed with respect to the unsolicited-guidance group which wrote better training essays, showed evidence of having internalized the explicitly provided guidance, and demonstrated significant subsequent improvement in writing when no computerized tool was available anymore. The solicited-guidance group and the control group showed virtually no improvement, and unlike in the unsolicited-guidance group, initially poorer writers continued to lag behind initially better writers.
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Jun 24, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.