Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Basner, W. Babisch, A. Davis, M. Brink, C. Clark, S. Janssen, S. Stansfeld (2014)
Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on healthThe Lancet, 383
T. Chang, C. Liu, L. Young, V. Wang, Shen-En Jian, B. Bao (2012)
Noise frequency components and the prevalence of hypertension in workers.The Science of the total environment, 416
M. Eghbali, A. Khosravi, A. Feizi, A. Mansouri, B. Mahaki, N. Sarrafzadegan (2018)
Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control, and risk factors of hypertension among adults: a cross-sectional study in IranEpidemiology and Health, 40
Fikret Veljović, Senad Burak, E. Begić, I. Masic (2019)
Noise Effect on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate - Regression Analysis in Service of PredictionActa Informatica Medica, 27
A. Fyhri, Gunn Aasvang (2010)
Noise, sleep and poor health: Modeling the relationship between road traffic noise and cardiovascular problems.The Science of the total environment, 408 21
M. Aliabadi, R. Golmohammadi, A. Ohadi, Z. Mansoorizadeh, Hassan Khotanlou, Mohammad Sarrafzadeh (2014)
Development of an Empirical Acoustic Model for Predicting Reverberation Time in Typical Industrial Workrooms Using Artificial Neural NetworksActa Acustica United With Acustica, 100
L. Brocolini, É. Parizet, P. Chevret (2016)
Effect of masking noise on cognitive performance and annoyance in open plan officesApplied Acoustics, 114
L. Jarup, W. Babisch, D. Houthuijs, G. Pershagen, K. Katsouyanni, E. Cadum, Marie-Louise Dudley, Pauline Savigny, I. Seiffert, W. Swart, O. Breugelmans, G. Bluhm, Jenny Selander, Alexandros Haralabidis, K. Dimakopoulou, P. Sourtzi, M. Velonakis, Federica Vigna-Taglianti (2007)
Hypertension and Exposure to Noise Near Airports: the HYENA StudyEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 116
R. Golmohammadi, E. Darvishi, M. Motlagh, J. Faradmal (2021)
Role of individual and personality traits in occupational noise-induced psychological effectsApplied Acoustics, 173
I. Yılmaz, A. Yuksek (2008)
An Example of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Application for Indirect Estimation of Rock ParametersRock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 41
Torgyn Shaikhina, D. Lowe, S. Daga, D. Briggs, R. Higgins, N. Khovanova (2017)
Decision tree and random forest models for outcome prediction in antibody incompatible kidney transplantationBiomed. Signal Process. Control., 52
G. Biau (2010)
Analysis of a Random Forests ModelJ. Mach. Learn. Res., 13
Susana Rubio, Eva Diaz, Jesus Martin, José Puente (2004)
Evaluation of Subjective Mental Workload: A Comparison of SWAT, NASA‐TLX, and Workload Profile MethodsApplied Psychology, 53
M. Alam, M. Rahman, Mohammad Rahman (2019)
A Random Forest based predictor for medical data classification using feature rankingInformatics in Medicine Unlocked
Bodil Björ, L. Burström, M. Karlsson, T. Nilsson, U. Näslund, U. Wiklund (2007)
Acute effects on heart rate variability when exposed to hand transmitted vibration and noiseInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 81
(2003)
Acoustics-determination of occupational noise exposure -Engineering method. International Organization for Standardization
Milad Abbasi, Saeid Yazdanirad, P. Habibi, Saeid Arabi, R. Madvari, A. Mehri, Mohsen Poursadeghiyan, M. Ebrahimi, M. Ghaljahi (2019)
Relationship among noise exposure, sensitivity, and noise annoyance with job satisfaction and job stress in a textile industryNoise & Vibration Worldwide, 50
Laure-Anne Gille, C. Marquis-Favre, R. Weber (2017)
Aircraft noise annoyance modeling: Consideration of noise sensitivity and of different annoying acoustical characteristicsApplied Acoustics, 115
B. Berglund, T. Lindvall, D. Schwela (1999)
Guidelines for community noise
S. Park, P. Lee, Jeongho Jeong (2018)
Effects of noise sensitivity on psychophysiological responses to building noiseBuilding and Environment, 136
Charles Calderwood, P. Ackerman (2011)
The relative impact of trait and temporal determinants of subjective fatiguePersonality and Individual Differences, 50
S. Ali (2011)
Industrial noise levels and annoyance in EgyptApplied Acoustics, 72
D. Michaud, S. Keith, Katya Feder, Sonia Voicescu, L. Marro, John Than, M. Guay, T. Bower, Allison Denning, É. Lavigne, Chantal Whelan, S. Janssen, T. Leroux, Frits Berg (2016)
Personal and situational variables associated with wind turbine noise annoyance.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139 3
Alexandros Haralabidis, K. Dimakopoulou, F. Vigna-Taglianti, M. Giampaolo, A. Borgini, Marie-Louise Dudley, G. Pershagen, G. Bluhm, D. Houthuijs, W. Babisch, M. Velonakis, K. Katsouyanni, L. Jarup (2008)
Acute effects of night-time noise exposure on blood pressure in populations living near airports.European heart journal, 29 5
C. Themann, Elizabeth Masterson (2019)
Occupational noise exposure: A review of its effects, epidemiology, and impact with recommendations for reducing its burden.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146 5
M. Motlagh, R. Golmohammadi, M. Aliabadi, J. Faradmal, Akram Ranjbar (2018)
Empirical Study of Room Acoustic Conditions and Neurophysiologic Strain in Staff Working in Special Open-Plan Bank OfficesAcoustics Australia, 46
E. Darvishi, A. Maleki, Omid Giahi, A. Akbarzadeh (2016)
Subjective Mental Workload and Its Correlation With Musculoskeletal Disorders in Bank Staff.Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 39 6
B. Ekehammar, S. Dornič (1990)
Weinstein's Noise Sensitivity Scale: Reliability and Construct ValidityPerceptual and Motor Skills, 70
R. Golmohammadi, E. Darvishi, J. Faradmal, J. Poorolajal, M. Aliabadi (2020)
Attention and short-term memory during occupational noise exposure considering task difficultyApplied Acoustics, 158
K. Brännström, Erika Johansson, Daniel Vigertsson, D. Morris, Birgitta Sahlén, Viveka Lyberg-Åhlander (2017)
How Children Perceive the Acoustic Environment of Their SchoolNoise & Health, 19
D. Hackam, R. Quinn, P. Ravani, D. Rabi, K. Dasgupta, S. Daskalopoulou, N. Khan, R. Herman, S. Bacon, L. Cloutier, M. Dawes, S. Rabkin, R. Gilbert, M. Ruzicka, D. McKay, T. Campbell, S. Grover, G. Honos, E. Schiffrin, P. Bolli, T. Wilson, R. Feldman, P. Lindsay, M. Hill, M. Gelfer, K. Burns, M. Vallée, G. Prasad, M. Lebel, D. Mclean, J. Arnold, G. Moe, J. Howlett, J. Boulanger, P. Larochelle, Lawrence Leiter, Charlotte Jones, R. Ogilvie, V. Woo, J. Kaczorowski, L. Trudeau, R. Petrella, A. Milot, J. Stone, D. Drouin, K. Lavoie, M. Lamarre-Cliche, M. Godwin, G. Tremblay, P. Hamet, G. Fodor, S. Carruthers, G. Pylypchuk, E. Burgess, R. Lewanczuk, G. Dresser, S. Penner, R. Hegele, P. McFarlane, Mukul Sharma, Debra Reid, S. Tobe, L. Poirier, R. Padwal (2013)
The 2013 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension.The Canadian journal of cardiology, 29 5
Ken Hume (2010)
Sleep disturbance due to noise: current issues and future research.Noise & health, 12 47
L. Steinbach, M. Altinsoy (2019)
Prediction of annoyance evaluations of electric vehicle noise by using artificial neural networksApplied Acoustics
Mohammad Khalilia, S. Chakraborty, M. Popescu (2011)
Predicting disease risks from highly imbalanced data using random forestBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11
Evidence of the non-auditory effects of noise exposure on workers is growing. This study aimed to empirically present prediction models of psychophysiological responses of workers with respect to noise exposure. In this study, 169 male workers from typical industrial workrooms were asked to judge the mental workload, noise annoyance, and noise sensitivity during exposure to noise. Two main physiological responses that include heart rate and blood pressure were also measured. Noise exposure characteristics were measured using the calibrated instruments. Empirical prediction models were developed based on Random forest compared with the regression method. 46% of the workers were exposed to noise up to the exposure limit (85 dB for 8 h) and 54% of the workers were exposed to noise upper than it. It is observed that the considerable body response changes of workers exposed to noise from the medium to high levels (p < 0.05). Random forest could provide more accurate predictions than multiple regressions (R square = 0.73 to 0.80). Four variables as noise dose, noise sensitivity, age, and noise frequency are found to be the important factors influencing the psychological responses, respectively. Moreover, the main variables as noise sensitivity and noise dose and age are found to be the important factors influencing the physiological responses, respectively. Changes in the psychophysiological responses above the medium noise levels confirmed that the action level (82 dB for 8 h) can be a suitable criterion to prevent possible auditory and non-auditory complications. These dose-response models can be helpful in setting definitive exposure limits for noise-induced non-auditory effects at workplaces.
Noise & Vibration Worldwide – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.