Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1971)
Learning and human abilities
E. Jones, James Krouse (1988)
The Effectiveness of Data-Based Instruction by Student Teachers in Classrooms for Pupils with Mild Learning HandicapsTeacher Education and Special Education, 11
do I have enough? YES"). If the answer is YES, spend the seven 1-dollar bills. This leaves you seven one-dollar bills
Using the ones' place, model the process of asking whether you have enough one-dollar bills (i.e., "I have four 1-dollar bills; I need to spend seven 1-dollar bills
Ralph Putnam (1987)
Structuring and Adjusting Content for Students: A Study of Live and Simulated Tutoring of Addition, 24
(1990)
Math outcomes for successful transitions
J. Parry, A. Hofmeister (1986)
Development and Validation of an Expert System for Special EducatorsLearning Disability Quarterly, 9
(1989)
Subtraction with regrouping: A trouble spot for students with math problems
Caren Wesson, S. Deno (1989)
An Analysis of Long-Term Instructional Plans in Reading for Elementary Resource Room StudentsRemedial and Special Education, 10
(1966)
The individually prescribed instruction project
M. Colbourn, J. McLeod (1982)
Computer Guided Educational Diagnosis: A Prototype Expert SystemJournal of Special Education Technology, 6
G. Leinhardt, W. Bickel, A. Pallay (1982)
Unlabeled but Still Entitled: Toward More Effective RemediationTeachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 84
L. Fuchs, S. Deno (1991)
Paradigmatic Distinctions between Instructionally Relevant Measurement ModelsExceptional Children, 57
If, however, you borrow and exchange one 10-dollar bill, you've used one 10-dollar bill. So
(1980)
Exceptional teaching (2nd ed.)
Phyllis Mirkin, Margaret Potter (1982)
A Survey of Program Planning and Implementation Practices of LD Teachers.
S. Deno (1985)
Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging AlternativeExceptional Children, 52
R. Glaser (1977)
Adaptive Education: Individual Diversity and Learning
L. Fuchs (1989)
The Reliability and Validity of Skills Analysis within Curriculum-Based Measurement., 14
Aaron Pallas, Gary Natriello, Edward Mcdill (1989)
The Changing Nature of the Disadvantaged Population Current Dimensions and Future TrendsEducational Researcher, 18
L. Fuchs (1988)
Effects of Computer-Managed Instruction on Teachers' Implementation of Systematic Monitoring Programs and Student Achievement.Journal of Educational Research, 81
(1990)
Development of a school building model for educating handicapped and at risk students in general education
(1990)
Indexing academic progress: Standards for judging student progress
M. Wittrock (1986)
Handbook of research on teaching
(1985)
Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando
P. Peterson, C. Clark (1978)
Teachers’ Reports of Their Cognitive Processes During TeachingAmerican Educational Research Journal, 15
L. Salmon-Cox (1981)
Teachers and Standardized Achievement Tests: What's Really Happening?.Phi Delta Kappan, 62
borrow a 10-dollar bill. However, to use the 10-dollar bill you borrow, you'll have to take it to the bank and exchange one 10-dollar bill for ten 1-dollar bills
L. Fuchs, S. Deno, Phyllis Mirkin (1984)
The Effects of Frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and Evaluation on Pedagogy, Student Achievement, and Student Awareness of Learning, 21
L. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, C. Hamlett (1989)
Effects of Alternative Goal Structures within Curriculum-Based MeasurementExceptional Children, 55
Ray Thompson, K. White, D. Morgan (1982)
Teacher-Student Interaction Patterns in Classrooms with Mainstreamed Mildly Handicapped Students, 19
(1984)
CLASS:LD: An expert system for classifying learning disabilities [Computer program
M. Shinn (1989)
Curriculum-Based Measurement: Assessing Special Children
Lynn Fuchs, D. Fuchs, Pamela Stecker (1989)
Effects of Curriculum-Based Measurement on Teachers' Instructional PlanningJournal of Learning Disabilities, 22
The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of (a) ongoing, systematic assessment of student growth (i.e., curriculum-based measurement) and (b) expert system instructional consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in the area of mathematics operations. Thirty-three teachers were assigned randomly to treatment groups: curriculum-based measurement (CBM) with expert system instructional consultation (CBM-ExS), CBM with no expert system instructional consultation (CBM-NExS), and control (i.e., no CBM). Teachers implemented treatments for 20 weeks. Analyses indicated that, compared to the control group, both CBM groups appeared to revise students’ instructional programs more frequently. However, only the CBM-ExS group effected superior student achievement. Analysis of the nature of teachers’ instructional adjustments indicated that the teaching revisions of the CBM-ExS teachers incorporated a dual focus on what types of problems to teach and what strategies to employ for teaching. By contrast, the CBM-NExS teachers focused solely on what types of problems to reteach. Findings are discussed in terms of previous studies of teacher planning and implications for practice.
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Jun 23, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.