Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Effects of Competition as a Motivational Technique in the Classroom1

Effects of Competition as a Motivational Technique in the Classroom1 Effects of Competition as a Motivational Technique in the Classroom1 MARGARET M. CLIFFORD University of Iowa The use of competition with speed-related tasks in an educational setting has repeatedly been shown to increase performance (Chapman and Feder, 1917; Clayton, 1964; Clifford, 1971; Hurlock, 1927; Mailer, 1929). On the other hand, Clifford, Cleary and Walster (1971) found that a competitive treatment had no effect on the performance of Ss taking a power-oriented test (i.e., a power-test or complex problem- solving test on which a time limit is imposed). On the basis of two related experiments, Shaw (1958) likewise concluded that competition more easily affected performance on mechanical or skill-oriented tasks than on complex, problem-solving tasks. These studies imply an inverse relationship between the com­ plexity of the task and performance-increase due to competitive motivation. Support for this inverse relationship is also provided by theorists who have examined the more general relationship between task-performance and motivation (Ahlstrom, 1957; Guilford, 1954; Lowell, 1952). At the same time, there is evidence that the relationship between motivation and performance is curvilinear (Atkinson and O'Conner, 1966; Bruner, Matter and Papanek, 1955; Yerkes and Dodson, 1908). The effect of educational competition is likely to be a http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Educational Research Journal SAGE

Effects of Competition as a Motivational Technique in the Classroom1

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/effects-of-competition-as-a-motivational-technique-in-the-classroom1-QZOUGqSNdg

References (26)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0002-8312
eISSN
1935-1011
DOI
10.3102/00028312009001123
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Effects of Competition as a Motivational Technique in the Classroom1 MARGARET M. CLIFFORD University of Iowa The use of competition with speed-related tasks in an educational setting has repeatedly been shown to increase performance (Chapman and Feder, 1917; Clayton, 1964; Clifford, 1971; Hurlock, 1927; Mailer, 1929). On the other hand, Clifford, Cleary and Walster (1971) found that a competitive treatment had no effect on the performance of Ss taking a power-oriented test (i.e., a power-test or complex problem- solving test on which a time limit is imposed). On the basis of two related experiments, Shaw (1958) likewise concluded that competition more easily affected performance on mechanical or skill-oriented tasks than on complex, problem-solving tasks. These studies imply an inverse relationship between the com­ plexity of the task and performance-increase due to competitive motivation. Support for this inverse relationship is also provided by theorists who have examined the more general relationship between task-performance and motivation (Ahlstrom, 1957; Guilford, 1954; Lowell, 1952). At the same time, there is evidence that the relationship between motivation and performance is curvilinear (Atkinson and O'Conner, 1966; Bruner, Matter and Papanek, 1955; Yerkes and Dodson, 1908). The effect of educational competition is likely to be a

Journal

American Educational Research Journal – SAGE

Published: Jan 1, 1972

There are no references for this article.