Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Z. Tian, Lianying Zhang, T. Peng, F. Ma (2008)
Load Tests of Dongping Bridge in Foshan, China, 17
M. Schwarz, J. Laman (2001)
Response of Prestressed Concrete I-Girder Bridges to Live LoadJournal of Bridge Engineering, 6
P. Paultre, J. Proulx, M. Talbot (1995)
Dynamic Testing Procedures for Highway Bridges Using Traffic LoadsJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 121
B. Bakht, S. Pinjarkar (1989)
DYNAMIC TESTING OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES--A REVIEWTransportation Research Record
H. Nassif, A. Nowak (1995)
DYNAMIC LOAD SPECTRA FOR GIRDER BRIDGESTransportation Research Record
(1989)
Review of Dynamic Testing of Highway Bridges, Transportation Research Board, and Research and Development Branch, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Canada
Á. Cunha, E. Caetano, F. Magalhães (2007)
Output-only dynamic testing of bridges and special structuresStructural Concrete, 8
S. Moaveni (1999)
Finite Element Analysis
R. Cantieni (1983)
Dynamic load tests on highway bridges in switzerland - 60 years experience of EMPA
Mahil Inbanathan, M. Wieland (1987)
Closure of "Bridge Vibrations Due to Vehicle Moving Over Rough Surface"Journal of Structural Engineering-asce, 115
Cheung (2001)
Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation || Vibration Analysis of Bridges Under Moving Vehicles and Trains
Tseng Huang, A. Veletsos (1960)
Dynamic Response of Three-Span Continuous Highway Bridges
(1999)
Numerical Methods Using MATLAB, Prentice Hall, USA
R. Karoumi, A. Andersson, H. Sundquist (2006)
Static and Dynamic Load Testing of the New Svinesund Arch Bridge
Qingfei Gao, Z. Wang, Chuang Chen, B. Guo (2014)
Comfort Analysis of Large-Span Continuous Girder Bridges to Moving Vehicular LoadsKey Engineering Materials, 619
I. Paeglite, A. Paeglitis (2013)
The Dynamic Amplification Factor of the Bridges in LatviaProcedia Engineering, 57
(1999)
Vibration of Solids and Structures under Moving Loads, Thomas Telford, UK
L. Frýba (1999)
VIBRATION OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES UNDER MOVING LOADS (3RD EDITION)
R. Clough, J. Penzien, D. Griffin (1975)
Dynamics Of Structures
G. Lindfield, J. Penny (1998)
Numerical Methods Using MATLAB
Qingfei Gao, Z. Wang, B. Guo, Haolin Bu, Wei Xiong (2013)
Design on Dynamic Performance of Highway Bridges to Moving Vehicular LoadsKey Engineering Materials, 574
M. Griffin, J. French (1991)
Space vehicle design
Ki-Tae Park, Sang Kim, Heung Park, Kyu-Wan Lee (2005)
The determination of bridge displacement using measured accelerationEngineering Structures, 27
Dongzhou Huang, Ton-Lo Wang, M. Shahawy (1992)
Impact Analysis of Continuous Multigirder Bridges due to Moving VehiclesJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 118
L. Frýba, M. Pirner (2001)
Load tests and modal analysis of bridgesEngineering Structures, 23
(2006)
Load Testing of the New Svinesund Bridge, Kungl Tekniska Högskolan, Sweden
D. McLean, M. Marsh (1998)
DYNAMIC IMPACT FACTORS FOR BRIDGESNCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice
R. Cantieni (1992)
Dynamic behavior of highway bridges under the passage of heavy vehicles
J. Stark (1993)
Space Vehicle Design N. D. Griffin and J. R. French American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 370 L' Enfant Promenade, SW, Washington, DC 20024-2518 USA. 465 pp. Illustrated. $47.95 (AIAA members), $61.95 (non members).The Aeronautical Journal (1968), 97
A. Chopra (1981)
Dynamics of Structures: A Primer
A. Brencich, D. Sabia (2007)
Tanaro Bridge: Dynamic Tests on a Couple of SpansJournal of Bridge Engineering, 12
Junhee Kim, J. Lynch, Jong-Jae Lee, Chang-Geun Lee
Iop Publishing Smart Materials and Structures Truck-based Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks for the Experimental Observation of Vehicle–bridge Interaction
Dynamic load allowance (DLA) is an important index used in design and evaluation of dynamic performance of highway bridges to moving vehicular loads. In many codes, DLAs of different responses in various sections are not distinguished. To facilitate a rational design and objective evaluation, the quantitative relationships of DLAs corresponding to different responses in various sections are systematically studied using both theoretical derivation and numerical simulation. According to results of theoretical derivation, for simply supported girder bridges, DLA of deflection is almost 20% higher than that of bending moment in the mid-span section. According to results of numerical simulation, for continuous girder bridges, DLA of negative (upward) deflection is 20% higher than that of positive deflection, and DLA of negative bending moment is 40% higher than that of positive bending moment in critical cases. These significant differences cannot be ignored. Finally, the contributions of high modes to different dynamic responses in various sections are investigated. Based on the recommended approach to considering these differences, the dynamic performance of bridge can be designed and evaluated in a simple yet rotational way.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Nov 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.