Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Yi, Hongnan Li, M. Gu (2012)
Sensor placement for structural health monitoring of Canton TowerSmart Structures and Systems, 10
T. Carne, C. Dohrmann (1994)
A modal test design strategy for model correlation, 2460
T. Yi, Hongnan Li, G. Song, Xu-Dong Zhang (2015)
Optimal sensor placement for health monitoring of high‐rise structure using adaptive monkey algorithmStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 22
Zhaoxia Li, T. Chan, R. Zheng (2003)
Statistical Analysis of Online Strain Response and Its Application in Fatigue Assessment of a Long-span Steel BridgeEngineering Structures, 25
Y. Erdogan, M. Gul, F. Catbas, P. Bakir (2014)
Investigation of Uncertainty Changes in Model Outputs for Finite-Element Model Updating Using Structural Health Monitoring DataJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 140
Minwoo Chang, S. Pakzad (2014)
Optimal Sensor Placement for Modal Identification of Bridge Systems Considering Number of Sensing NodesJournal of Bridge Engineering, 19
D. Kammer (1990)
Sensor Placement for On-Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures1990 American Control Conference
Yang Deng, Yang Liu, Dongming Feng, Ai-qun Li (2015)
Investigation of fatigue performance of welded details in long‐span steel bridges using long‐term monitoring strain dataStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 22
J. Ching, J. Beck (2004)
New Bayesian Model Updating Algorithm Applied to a Structural Health Monitoring BenchmarkStructural Health Monitoring, 3
M. Gul, F. Catbas (2011)
Damage Assessment with Ambient Vibration Data Using a Novel Time Series Analysis MethodologyJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 137
M. Sanayei, J. Phelps, J. Sipple, E. Bell, B. Brenner (2012)
Instrumentation, Nondestructive Testing, and Finite-Element Model Updating for Bridge Evaluation Using Strain MeasurementsJournal of Bridge Engineering, 17
C. Papadimitriou (2004)
Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systemsJournal of Sound and Vibration, 278
F. Matta, F. Bastianini, N. Galati, P. Casadei, A. Nanni (2008)
Distributed Strain Measurement in Steel Bridge with Fiber Optic Sensors: Validation through Diagnostic Load TestJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 22
F. Salehpour-Oskouei, M. Pourgol-Mohammad (2017)
Fault Diagnosis Improvement Using Dynamic Fault Model in Optimal Sensor Placement: A Case Study of Steam TurbineQuality and Reliability Engineering International, 33
Farzin Oskouei, M. Pourgol-Mohammad (2015)
Degradation Evaluation on Sensor Network Optimization in Fault Diagnosis Process
A. Adewuyi, Z. Wu (2011)
Modal macro‐strain flexibility methods for damage localization in flexural structures using long‐gage FBG sensorsStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 18
M. Pedram, A. Esfandiari, M. Khedmati (2016)
Finite element model updating using strain‐based power spectral density for damage detectionStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 23
T. Yi, Hongnan Li, Xu-Dong Zhang (2015)
Health monitoring sensor placement optimization for Canton Tower using immune monkey algorithmStructural Control and Health Monitoring, 22
M. Meo, G. Zumpano (2005)
On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structureEngineering Structures, 27
K. Worden, A. Burrows (2001)
Optimal sensor placement for fault detectionEngineering Structures, 23
Hai-Bin Huang, T. Yi, Hongnan Li (2017)
Bayesian Combination of Weighted Principal-Component Analysis for Diagnosing Sensor Faults in Structural Monitoring SystemsJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 143
Xiao-Hua Zhang, Songye Zhu, You‐lin Xu, X. Homg (2011)
Integrated optimal placement of displacement transducers and strain gauges for better estimation of structural responseInternational Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 11
J. Beck, L. Katafygiotis (1998)
Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical FrameworkJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 124
Z. Shi, S. Law, L. Zhang (2000)
DAMAGE LOCALIZATION BY DIRECTLY USING INCOMPLETE MODE SHAPES. TECHNICAL NOTEJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 126
F. Udwadia (1994)
Methodology for Optimum Sensor Locations for Parameter Identification in Dynamic SystemsJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 120
(2006)
Benchmark problem for bridge health monitoring: definition paper. In: The 4th world conference on structural control and monitoring
C. Zhang, You‐lin Xu (2016)
Optimal multi-type sensor placement for response and excitation reconstructionJournal of Sound and Vibration, 360
C. Papadimitriou, J. Beck, S. Au (2000)
Entropy-Based Optimal Sensor Location for Structural Model UpdatingJournal of Vibration and Control, 6
Zuo-Cai Wang, Dong Geng, W. Ren, Hong-Tao Liu (2014)
Strain modes based dynamic displacement estimation of beam structures with strain sensorsSmart Materials and Structures, 23
C. Stéphan (2012)
Sensor placement for modal identificationMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 27
F. Salehpour-Oskouei, M. Pourgol-Mohammad (2017)
Sensor placement determination in system health monitoring process based on dual information risk and uncertainty criteriaProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 232
K. Yuen, Sin‐Chi Kuok (2015)
Efficient Bayesian sensor placement algorithm for structural identification: a general approach for multi‐type sensory systemsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44
J. Penny, M. Friswell, S. Garvey (1994)
Automatic choice of measurement locations for dynamic testingAIAA Journal, 32
L. Yam, T. Leung, D. Li, K. Xue (1996)
THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MODAL STRAIN ANALYSISJournal of Sound and Vibration, 191
D. Kammer, M. Tinker (2002)
Optimal placement of triaxial accelerometers for modal vibration testsMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 18
Strain gauges and accelerometers are widely used in bridge structural health monitoring systems. Generally, the strain gauges are placed on the key locations to obtain local structural deformation information; the accelerometers are used to obtain the structural modal information. However, the modal information contained in the measured strains is not taken into account. In this article, to fully utilize the modal information contained in strains, a mode shape estimation method is proposed that the strain mode shapes of the strain locations are used to obtain the displacement mode shapes of some positions without accelerometers. At first, to simulate the practical situation, some positions with large structural deformations are selected as the strain gauge locations. Using the proposed mode shape estimation method, the displacement mode shapes of some locations without accelerometers are estimated by the strain mode shapes using the least squares method, and the locations with the smallest estimation error are finally determined as the estimated locations. Then, accelerometers are added to the existing sensor placement. Here, the modal assurance criterion is used to evaluate the distinguishability of the displacement mode shapes obtained from the strain gauges and accelerometers. The accelerometer locations that bring the smallest modal assurance criterion values are selected. In addition, a redundancy can be set to avoid the adjacent sensors containing similar modal information. Through the proposed sensor placement method, the deformation and modal information contained in the strain gauges is fully utilized; the modal information contained in the strain gauges and accelerometers is comprehensively utilized. Numerical experiments are carried out using a bridge benchmark structure to demonstrate the sensor placement method.
Advances in Structural Engineering – SAGE
Published: Feb 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.