Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1967)
The behavior of maximum likelihood
D. Nelson, Rajasri Basu, R. Purdie (1998)
An Examination of Exchange Quality and Work Stressors in Leader–Follower DyadsInternational Journal of Stress Management, 5
T. Scandura, G. Graen, M. Novak (1986)
When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader–member exchange and decision influence.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71
Thomas Becker, Melissa Robertson, R. Vandenberg (2018)
Nonlinear Transformations in Organizational Research: Possible Problems and Potential SolutionsOrganizational Research Methods, 22
Linda Putnam, Gail Fairhurst, S. Banghart (2016)
Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach†The Academy of Management Annals, 10
(2016)
Revisiting the matrix organization. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-andorganizational-performance/our-insights/revisiting-the-matrixorganization
Pankaj Patel (2011)
Role of manufacturing flexibility in managing duality of formalization and environmental uncertainty in emerging firmsJournal of Operations Management, 29
J. Antonakis, L. Atwater (2002)
LEADER DISTANCE: A REVIEW AND A PROPOSED THEORYLeadership Quarterly, 13
(2016)
Revisiting the matrix organization
J. Edwards (1994)
The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed AlternativeOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58
Vijaya Venkataramani, S. Green, Deidra Schleicher (2010)
Well-connected leaders: the impact of leaders' social network ties on LMX and members' work attitudes.The Journal of applied psychology, 95 6
Joachim Wolf, William Egelhoff (2013)
An empirical evaluation of conflict in MNC matrix structure firmsInternational Business Review, 22
Zhen Zhang, Mo Wang, Junqi Shi (2012)
Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchangeAcademy of Management Journal, 55
(2009)
Designing matrix organizations that work
David Henderson, R. Liden, Brian Glibkowski, A. Chaudhry (2009)
LMX Differentiation: A Multilevel Review and Examination of its Antecedents and OutcomesLeadership Quarterly, 20
J. Álvarez, S. Svejenova (2006)
Sharing Executive Power: Roles and Relationships at the Top
(2009)
The value of value congru
Barbara Knippenberg, D. Knippenberg (2005)
Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: the moderating role of leader prototypicality.The Journal of applied psychology, 90 1
Yan Zhang, D. Waldman, Yu-Lan Han, Xiao-Bei Li (2015)
Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and ConsequencesAcademy of Management Journal, 58
M. Chemers (2008)
Leadership Effectiveness: An Integrative Review
R. Stewart (1991)
Chairmen and Chief Executives: an Exploration of Their RelationshipJournal of Management Studies, 28
(1985)
A Monte Carlo study of the effects
Charlotte Gerstner, D. Day (1997)
Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct IssuesJournal of Applied Psychology, 82
G. Graen, Mary Uhl‐Bien (1995)
Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspectiveLeadership Quarterly, 6
M. Evans (1985)
A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36
William Egelhoff, Joachim Wolf, M. Adzic (2013)
Designing Matrix Structures to Fit MNC Strategy: Designing Matrix Structures to Fit MNC StrategyGlobal Strategy Journal, 3
G. Johns (2006)
The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational BehaviorAcademy of Management Review, 31
Peter Gronn (2002)
Distributed leadership as a unit of analysisLeadership Quarterly, 13
James Dulebohn, W. Bommer, R. Liden, Robyn Brouer, G. Ferris (2012)
A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member ExchangeJournal of Management, 38
J. O'toole, Jay Galbraith, E. Lawler (2002)
When Two (or More) Heads are Better Than One: The Promise and Pitfalls of Shared LeadershipCalifornia Management Review, 44
On the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement
F. Yammarino, Shelley Dionne, Jae Chun, F. Dansereau (2005)
Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science reviewLeadership Quarterly, 16
J. Denis, A. Langley, Viviane Sergi (2012)
Leadership in the PluralThe Academy of Management Annals, 6
C. Fisher, R. Gitelson (1983)
A Meta-Analysis of the Correlates of Role Conflict and AmbiguityJournal of Applied Psychology, 68
(2012)
Use and misuse of levels of analysis in leadership
Jayoung Kim, F. Yammarino, Shelley Dionne, Rory Eckardt, Minyoung Cheong, Chou-Yu Tsai, Jie Guo, J. Park (2020)
State-of-the-science review of leader-follower dyads researchLeadership Quarterly, 31
Jeremy Bernerth, Herman Aguinis (2016)
A Critical Review and Best‐Practice Recommendations for Control Variable UsagePersonnel Psychology, 69
Joachim Wolf, William Egelhoff (2001)
Strategy and Structure: Extending the Theory and Integrating the Research on National and International FirmsSchmalenbach Business Review, 53
Hock-Peng Sin, J. Nahrgang, F. Morgeson (2009)
Understanding why they don't see eye to eye: an examination of leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement.The Journal of applied psychology, 94 4
(2007)
Using multivariate statistics (Vol
(1985)
A meta - analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role clarity in work settings
(1964)
Occupational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity
Jessica Dinh, R. Lord, W. Gardner, Jeremy Meuser, R. Liden, Jinyu Hu (2014)
Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectivesLeadership Quarterly, 25
G. Harold, F. Fincham, L. Osborne, R. Conger (1997)
Mom and dad are at it again: adolescent perceptions of marital conflict and adolescent psychological distress.Developmental psychology, 33 2
J. French, B. Raven (1959)
The bases of social power.
J. Edwards (2002)
Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology.
(1999)
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes
R. House, J. Rizzo (1972)
Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7
Li-tze Hu, P. Bentler (1999)
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling, 6
F. Dansereau, G. Graen, William Haga (1975)
A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making processOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13
(1983)
A meta-analysis of the corre
(2009)
LMXDifferentiation : Amultilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes
S. Jackson, R. Schuler (1985)
A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settingsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36
Jay Galbraith, Robert Kazanjian (1986)
Organizing to implement strategies of diversity and globalization: The role of matrix designsHuman Resource Management, 25
A. Seers (1989)
Team-member exchange quality: a new construct for role-making researchOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43
(2006)
Pushing the frontier of LMX research: The contribution of triads
W. Joyce (1986)
Matrix Organization: A Social ExperimentAcademy of Management Journal, 29
David Henderson, Tanguy Dulac, R. Liden (2006)
The role of LMX and communication in the goal setting process
Dorothy Carter, Leslie DeChurch, Michael Braun, N. Contractor (2015)
Social network approaches to leadership: an integrative conceptual review.The Journal of applied psychology, 100 3
C. Pearce, C. Wassenaar, Yair Berson, Rivka Tuval-Mashiach (2019)
Toward a theory of meta-paradoxical leadershipOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Jeffery Muldoon, Russell Matthews, Caroline Foley (2012)
Mediated effects of physical risk factors, leader-member exchange and empowerment in predicting perceived injury risk.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 28 2
S. Stashevsky, R. Burke (2006)
Leadership in organizationsInternational Journal of Manpower, 27
Hans Havlicek (1973)
[The bases].ZWR, 82 11
Ronald Deluga, J. Perry (1991)
The relationship of subordinate upward influencing behaviour, satisfaction and perceived superior effectiveness with leader—member exchangesJournal of occupational psychology, 64
M. Hogg, R. Tindale, Blackwell Publishers, S. Tindale, Helen Meisenhelder, Amanda Dykema-Engblade (2001)
Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes
Yihao Liu, Yifan Song, Jaclyn Koopmann, Mo Wang, C. Chang, Junqi Shi (2017)
Eating Your Feelings? Testing a Model of Employees’ Work-Related Stressors, Sleep Quality, and Unhealthy EatingJournal of Applied Psychology, 102
Le Zhou, Mo Wang, Gilad Chen, Junqi Shi (2012)
Supervisors' upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment.The Journal of applied psychology, 97 3
Tamara Friedrich, W. Vessey, Matthew Schuelke, G. Ruark, M. Mumford (2009)
A Framework for Understanding Collective Leadership: The Selective Utilization of Leader and Team Expertise within NetworksLeadership Quarterly, 20
J. Edwards, M. Parry (1993)
On the Use of Polynomial Regression Equations As An Alternative to Difference Scores in Organizational ResearchAcademy of Management Journal, 36
Janaki Gooty, Andra Serban, J. Thomas, M. Gavin, F. Yammarino (2012)
Use and misuse of levels of analysis in leadership research: An illustrative review of leader–member exchangeLeadership Quarterly, 23
D. Kenny, Betsy McCoach (2003)
Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation ModelingStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10
D. Harding (2018)
A framework of understandingOxford Medicine Online
D. Adler (2016)
Using Multivariate Statistics
J. Schaubroeck, J. Cotton, K. Jennings (1989)
Antecedents and consequences of role stress: A covariance structure analysisJournal of Organizational Behavior, 10
Wu Liu, S. Tangirala, R. Ramanujam (2013)
The relational antecedents of voice targeted at different leaders.The Journal of applied psychology, 98 5
T. Judge, Ronald Piccolo, Remus Ilies (2004)
The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 1
P. Balkundi, M. Kilduff (2005)
The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadershipLeadership Quarterly, 17
K. Knight (1976)
Matrix Organization: A ReviewJournal of Management Studies, 13
Shelley Dionne, Alka Gupta, K. Sotak, Kristie Shirreffs, Andra Serban, C. Hao, Dong Kim, F. Yammarino (2014)
A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership researchLeadership Quarterly, 25
R. Ford, W. Randolph (1992)
Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project ManagementJournal of Management, 18
J. Edwards (1994)
Regression Analysis as an Alternative to Difference ScoresJournal of Management, 20
Malte Doehne, Andreas Herz (2018)
Krackhardt (1999): The Ties That Torture: Simmelian Tie Analysis in OrganizationsSchlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung
Thomas Rockstuhl, James Dulebohn, Soon Ang, L. Shore (2012)
Leader-member exchange (LMX) and culture: a meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries.The Journal of applied psychology, 97 6
J. Edwards, D. Cable (2009)
The value of value congruence.The Journal of applied psychology, 94 3
D. Kenny, C. Bond, C. Mohr, E. Horn (1996)
Do we know how much people like one another?Journal of personality and social psychology, 71 5
F. Yammarino, F. Dansereau (2008)
Multi-level nature of and multi-level approaches to leadership.Leadership Quarterly, 19
B. Schyns, D. Day (2010)
Critique and review of leader–member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellenceEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19
Scott Martin, H. Liao, E. Campbell (2013)
Directive versus Empowering Leadership: A Field Experiment Comparing Impacts on Task Proficiency and ProactivityAcademy of Management Journal, 56
Kathleen Krone (1991)
Effects of leader‐member exchange on subordinates’ upward influence attemptsCommunication Research Reports, 8
R. Gottfredson, Herman Aguinis (2017)
Leadership behaviors and follower performance: Deductive and inductive examination of theoretical rationales and underlying mechanismsJournal of Organizational Behavior, 38
P. Vidyarthi, B. Erdogan, Smriti Anand, R. Liden, A. Chaudhry (2014)
One member, two leaders: extending leader-member exchange theory to a dual leadership context.The Journal of applied psychology, 99 3
Kristin Cullen‐Lester, F. Yammarino (2016)
Collective and network approaches to leadership: Special issue introduction.Leadership Quarterly, 27
J. Ivancevich, M. Matteson (1980)
Stress and work : a managerial perspective
S. Markham (2010)
Leadership, levels of analysis, and déjà vu: Modest proposals for taxonomy and cladistics coupled with replication and visualizationLeadership Quarterly, 21
Suzanne Gils, Niels Quaquebeke, D. Knippenberg (2009)
The X-factor: On the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader–member exchange agreementEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19
L. Lambert, J. Edwards, D. Cable (2003)
BREACH AND FULFILLMENT OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT: A COMPARISON OF TRADITIONAL AND EXPANDED VIEWSPersonnel Psychology, 56
Peter Gronn, Andrew Hamilton (2004)
‘A Bit More Life in the Leadership’: Co-Principalship as Distributed Leadership PracticeLeadership and Policy in Schools, 3
M. Goold, Andrew Campbell (2003)
Making Matrix Structures Work:: Creating Clarity on Unit Roles and ResponsibilityEuropean Management Journal, 21
S. Markham, Ina Markham, Kristian Braekkan (2014)
A Visual Illustration of Induction in Multilevel Methods: The Problem of Leaders Awarding Countervailing Merit ComponentsJournal of Business and Psychology, 29
H. White (1980)
A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 48
P. Huber (1967)
The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions
S. Tangirala, S. Green, R. Ramanujam (2007)
In the shadow of the boss's boss: effects of supervisors' upward exchange relationships on employees.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 2
Timothy Lawrence (2022)
Parental support, marital conflict, and stress as predictors of depressive symptoms among African American adolescentsClinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27
While strategic management theories have heavily engaged with the reality of matrix organizations, leadership theories that actually focus on the people working within such arrangements are missing. We argue that (a) followers perceive dual leadership effectiveness to be more than the sum of each leader's effectiveness, (b) a core detriment to perceived dual leadership effectiveness is role conflict experienced by the follower, and (c) Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) needs to be theoretically extended to the triadic level to capture the influence of dual leadership. Specifically, followers’ role conflict and leadership effectiveness perceptions are driven not only by how they perceive their LMX relationships with both leaders, but also how they perceive the relationship quality between their leaders (dual leadership exchange, DLX). As such, even though higher LMX is still better than lower LMX, having a similar exchange relationship with both leaders reduces employees’ role conflict and, by extension, heightens dual leadership effectiveness. Additionally, we reason that when employees lack a good relationship with one of the leaders, higher DLX can act as a substitute. We find support for our hypotheses by applying polynomial regression analyses to a dataset of 111 managers from a matrix organization who report to both a regional and business unit leader.
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies – SAGE
Published: May 6, 2022
Keywords: leader-member exchange; role conflict; dual leadership effectiveness; dual leadership; matrix organization; collective leadership; leadership dyad
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.