Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Savulescu, I. Chalmers, J. Blunt (1996)
Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountabilityBMJ, 313
K. Abbasi, I. Heath (2005)
Ethics review of research and auditBMJ : British Medical Journal, 330
J. Abelson, P. Forest, A. Casebeer, G. Mackean (2004)
Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-makingJournal of Health Services Research and Policy, 9
S. Feasey (2002)
Paediatric nurses's pain management practice.Paediatric nursing, 14 2
P. Glasziou, I. Chalmers (2004)
Ethics review roulette: what can we learn?BMJ : British Medical Journal, 328
R. Smith (1992)
Audit and research.British Medical Journal, 305
D. Wald (2004)
Bureaucracy of ethics applicationsBMJ : British Medical Journal, 329
R. Gillespie, Dominique Florin, S. Gillam (2004)
How is patient‐centred care understood by the clinical, managerial and lay stakeholders responsible for promoting this agenda?Health Expectations, 7
J. Tetley, L. Haynes, M. Hawthorne, J. Odeyemi, J. Skinner, Dorace Smith, V. Wilson (2003)
Older people and research partnershipsQuality in Ageing and Older Adults, 4
K. Alberti (1995)
Local research ethics committeesBMJ, 311
J. Teare, Julie Smith (2004)
Using focus groups to explore the views of parents whose children are in hospital.Paediatric nursing, 16 5
H. Cayton (2004)
Patient and public involvementJournal of Health Services Research and Policy, 9
H. Hearnshaw (2004)
Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional studyBMJ : British Medical Journal, 328
C. Warlow (2004)
Clinical research under the cosh againBMJ : British Medical Journal, 329
C. Rayner (2000)
Informed consent.British journal of plastic surgery, 53 6
Journal of ORIGINAL ARTICLE Do you always need ethical review when involving and consulting with patients? Katrina Brockbank Salisbury Health Care NHS Trust, Salisbury, UK The National Health Service (NHS) came into being what happens to them - a patient-centred approach. over 50 years ago. During that time the philosophy However, clarification has not been given as to exactly associated with it has evolved from 'doing things to what this means, and research has demonstrated that them' to 'doing things for them', and more recently health-care professionals, educationalists, managers 'doing things with them'. Central to the latter is two and patient representatives have all developed different way communication. meanings of patient-centred care to reflect their own particular backgrounds and roles. What has however ~ffi.'(til!C patient and public involvement isfundamental to been said is, that to achieve patient-centred care, we an NHS based on choice, responsiveness and equity. are advised to involve patients both in service planning Delivering and designing health services around the needs of and evaluation, and in decisions relating to their own patients is key to the modernization (if the NHS and is treatment and care - including the design of research integral to improving patients' experiences
Journal of Integrated Care Pathways – SAGE
Published: Aug 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.