Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Debate: Moderator Subgroups for the Estimation of Educational Performance: A Comparison of Prediction Models1

Debate: Moderator Subgroups for the Estimation of Educational Performance: A Comparison of... American Educational Research Journal Winter 1974, Vol 11, No. 1, Pp. 63-75 Debate On occasion, we publish a set of papers debating an issue. Certainly, no last word is expected on either side of a given controversy, and it is hoped that further discussion ensues in the AERA conventions, workshops, and elsewhere. This section is another new feature initiated in the current issue. Moderator Subgroups for the Estimation of Educational Performance: A Comparison of Prediction Models 1 ROBER T W. LISSITZ LYL E F. SCHOENFELDT University of Georgia 1 This research was supported in part by a research grant from the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development under Research Grant 5-R01-HD04135-03. This study was undertaken while the authors were jointly affiliated with the Department of Psychology and the Institute of Behavioral Research. The authorship order has been determined by the judgements of two colleagues. The contributions of both authors to this study were considerable, with the differences being that the senior author had primary responsibility for the statistical considerations. 6 3 Lissitz and Schoenfeldt Moderators may be defined in a variety of ways but are generally considered as those factors intervening between the predictor and criterion variable http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Educational Research Journal SAGE

Debate: Moderator Subgroups for the Estimation of Educational Performance: A Comparison of Prediction Models1

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/debate-moderator-subgroups-for-the-estimation-of-educational-M40fxVPlRS

References (28)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by American Educational Research Association
ISSN
0002-8312
eISSN
1935-1011
DOI
10.3102/00028312011001063
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

American Educational Research Journal Winter 1974, Vol 11, No. 1, Pp. 63-75 Debate On occasion, we publish a set of papers debating an issue. Certainly, no last word is expected on either side of a given controversy, and it is hoped that further discussion ensues in the AERA conventions, workshops, and elsewhere. This section is another new feature initiated in the current issue. Moderator Subgroups for the Estimation of Educational Performance: A Comparison of Prediction Models 1 ROBER T W. LISSITZ LYL E F. SCHOENFELDT University of Georgia 1 This research was supported in part by a research grant from the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development under Research Grant 5-R01-HD04135-03. This study was undertaken while the authors were jointly affiliated with the Department of Psychology and the Institute of Behavioral Research. The authorship order has been determined by the judgements of two colleagues. The contributions of both authors to this study were considerable, with the differences being that the senior author had primary responsibility for the statistical considerations. 6 3 Lissitz and Schoenfeldt Moderators may be defined in a variety of ways but are generally considered as those factors intervening between the predictor and criterion variable

Journal

American Educational Research JournalSAGE

Published: Nov 23, 2016

There are no references for this article.