Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Towards a Saner Approach
Plea Bargaining: The Need for Controls
(1975)
Australian Law Reform Commission
(1977)
Australian Institute of Criminology (and) Melbourne
J. Munro (1970)
Open Systems Theory: A Framework for the Analysis of Criminal Justice AdministrationAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 3
(1977)
Criminal Investigation Bill 1977: An Overview and Brief History
(1977)
The Criminal Process: A Subject Ripe fOF a Major Inquiry
(1917)
Rape Law Reform: The Australian Experiences
R. Myren (1976)
Study of Federated Criminal Justice Systems: Research NeedsCriminal Justice Review, 1
M. Wolfgang (1972)
Making the Criminal Justice System AccountableCrime & Delinquency, 18
Alan Arcuri (1977)
Criminal Justice: A Police PerspectiveCriminal Justice Review, 2
(1973)
National Advisory Commission ·on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, Corrections. Washington DC. US Government Printing Office
(1973)
Substantive Criminal Law" in 1978. The Committee also produced a Special Report on Hane and Other Sexual Offences in 1976
(1968)
Trial Judges and the Police: Their Relations in the Administration of Criminal Justice
M. Forst (1977)
To What Extent Should the Criminal Justice System Be a "System"?Crime & Delinquency, 23
M. Forst (1977)
Trial Courts in the Modern System of Criminal JusticeCriminal Justice Review, 2
AUST & NZ JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY '(December 1978) 11 (195-208) CRIMINAL JUSTICE: A SYSTEMS APPROACH Peter A Sallmann 0 In recent years increasing emphasis has been placed on the non-system nature of the criminal justice process. This emphasis has largely operated in academic criminal justice circles but the debate has also permeated the practice of criminal justice. Most of the discussion has taken place in the United States. The arguments, however, are equally applicable to other Anglo-American criminal justice systems, especially those of countries such as Britain and Australia. This article sets out to raise some of the questions and issues and to pose some of the conceptual and practical difficulties involved in suggestions which have been made to tighten the set of relationships between the various components of the criminal justice system. The discussion will be centered on Australian problems but useful references can be made to overseas developments, particularly those in Britain and the United States. The System Question The essence of the argument that the criminal justice system is not really a "system" is that although the components of the process are linked through the common denominator of processing offenders, and to this extent are interdependent,
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology – SAGE
Published: Dec 1, 1978
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.