Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Correction

Correction Regarding Tagler, M. J., and Jeffers, H. M. (2013). Sex differences in attitudes toward partner infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 821–832: The authors wish to correct values in the originally published manuscript. Specifically, incorrect 95% confidence intervals around the Cohen's d values were reported on page 826 of the manuscript where we reported the within-sex simple effects for the significant Participant Sex × Infidelity Type interaction (first paragraph), and for attitudes toward partner infidelity (second paragraph). Corrected values are presented in bold below. The authors would like to thank Dr. Bernard Beins at Ithaca College for bringing these errors to our attention. Men rated sexual infidelity significantly more distressing (M = 4.69, SD = 0.74) than they rated emotional infidelity (M = 4.32, SD = 0.92), F(1, 322) = 23.96, p < .001, d = 0.44, 95% CI [0.23, 0.65], but there was little difference between women's ratings of sexual (M = 4.80, SD = 0.48) and emotional infidelity (M = 4.76, SD = 0.57), F(1, 322) = 0.48, p = .29, d = 0.08, 95% CI [−0.10, 0.26]. As expected, men rated sexual infidelity (M = 1.44, SD = 0.70) more negatively than they rated emotional infidelity (M = 2.66, SD = 1.37), F(1, 322) = 120.00, p < .001, d = 1.12, 95% CI [0.85, 1.39]. Although women also rated sexual infidelity (M = 1.40, SD = 0.62) more negatively than they rated emotional infidelity (M = 2.09, SD = 1.10), this difference was not as large and thus in the evolutionary theory supportive direction, F(1, 322) = 72.03, p < .001, d = 0.77, 95% CI [0.60, 0.94]. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Evolutionary Psychology SAGE

Correction

Evolutionary Psychology , Volume 12 (1): 1 – Jan 1, 2014

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/correction-hDw0JPIObp

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2014 SAGE Publications Inc.
ISSN
1474-7049
eISSN
1474-7049
DOI
10.1177/147470491401200104
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Regarding Tagler, M. J., and Jeffers, H. M. (2013). Sex differences in attitudes toward partner infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 821–832: The authors wish to correct values in the originally published manuscript. Specifically, incorrect 95% confidence intervals around the Cohen's d values were reported on page 826 of the manuscript where we reported the within-sex simple effects for the significant Participant Sex × Infidelity Type interaction (first paragraph), and for attitudes toward partner infidelity (second paragraph). Corrected values are presented in bold below. The authors would like to thank Dr. Bernard Beins at Ithaca College for bringing these errors to our attention. Men rated sexual infidelity significantly more distressing (M = 4.69, SD = 0.74) than they rated emotional infidelity (M = 4.32, SD = 0.92), F(1, 322) = 23.96, p < .001, d = 0.44, 95% CI [0.23, 0.65], but there was little difference between women's ratings of sexual (M = 4.80, SD = 0.48) and emotional infidelity (M = 4.76, SD = 0.57), F(1, 322) = 0.48, p = .29, d = 0.08, 95% CI [−0.10, 0.26]. As expected, men rated sexual infidelity (M = 1.44, SD = 0.70) more negatively than they rated emotional infidelity (M = 2.66, SD = 1.37), F(1, 322) = 120.00, p < .001, d = 1.12, 95% CI [0.85, 1.39]. Although women also rated sexual infidelity (M = 1.40, SD = 0.62) more negatively than they rated emotional infidelity (M = 2.09, SD = 1.10), this difference was not as large and thus in the evolutionary theory supportive direction, F(1, 322) = 72.03, p < .001, d = 0.77, 95% CI [0.60, 0.94].

Journal

Evolutionary PsychologySAGE

Published: Jan 1, 2014

There are no references for this article.