Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comments: Some Unbelievably Good Results and Their Implications:

Comments: Some Unbelievably Good Results and Their Implications: Comments Some Unbelievably Good Results and Their Implications In answering questions on prose material, Natkin and Stahler (1969) hypothesized that high arousal would produce low immediate recall and high long-term recall, and that low arousal would produce high immediate recall and low delayed recall. The data they have reported seem to lend excellent support to this hypothesis. However, caution is advised in the acceptance of this evidence, even though Natkin and Stahler report statistical significance in support of their hypothesis. Lykken (1968), in a recent article on statistical significance in research, argues that replication is necessary for confirming hypotheses and that statistical significance is perhaps the least important attribute of a good experiment. Furthermore, Lykken contends that really large effects, differences, or relationships may even argue against the hy­ pothesis being tested. It appears that such a case can be made against Natkin and Stahler's evidence. The low arousal condition used in their research consisted of build­ ing an expectancy of adjunct questions in a preliminary condition, and then a continuation of this condition in the succeeding experimental condition (Group B) . The high arousal condition was simply the ab­ sence of adjunct questions in the preliminary reading condition http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Educational Research Journal SAGE

Comments: Some Unbelievably Good Results and Their Implications:

American Educational Research Journal , Volume 7 (2): 2 – Jun 24, 2016

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/comments-some-unbelievably-good-results-and-their-implications-hpOD90bH06

References (3)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by American Educational Research Association
ISSN
0002-8312
eISSN
1935-1011
DOI
10.3102/00028312007002285
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Comments Some Unbelievably Good Results and Their Implications In answering questions on prose material, Natkin and Stahler (1969) hypothesized that high arousal would produce low immediate recall and high long-term recall, and that low arousal would produce high immediate recall and low delayed recall. The data they have reported seem to lend excellent support to this hypothesis. However, caution is advised in the acceptance of this evidence, even though Natkin and Stahler report statistical significance in support of their hypothesis. Lykken (1968), in a recent article on statistical significance in research, argues that replication is necessary for confirming hypotheses and that statistical significance is perhaps the least important attribute of a good experiment. Furthermore, Lykken contends that really large effects, differences, or relationships may even argue against the hy­ pothesis being tested. It appears that such a case can be made against Natkin and Stahler's evidence. The low arousal condition used in their research consisted of build­ ing an expectancy of adjunct questions in a preliminary condition, and then a continuation of this condition in the succeeding experimental condition (Group B) . The high arousal condition was simply the ab­ sence of adjunct questions in the preliminary reading condition

Journal

American Educational Research JournalSAGE

Published: Jun 24, 2016

There are no references for this article.