Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Chronic Demands and Responsivity to Challenge (Schaubroeck, 1993)

Chronic Demands and Responsivity to Challenge (Schaubroeck, 1993) LINKING PRACTICE & RES EAR C H SECTION EDITOR: SALLY L. LUSK, PhD, RN, FAAN Job Stress ea lt h y People 2000 reactions or illness. The model of Occupational Health Nursing (DHHS, 1991), the fed­ stress and health (Figure) pre­ job The University of Michigan H eral guideline for im­ sented by Hurrell (NIOSH, 1987) School ofNursing proving the health of our nation, depicts relationships among job Ann Arbor, MI focuses on a number of work site stressors, other factors, and ad­ CHRONIC DEMANDS AND health issues. The identified verse outcomes and is helpful to RESPONSIVITY TO goal in relation to stress is to keep in mind when analyzing job CHALLENGE (Schaubroeck, increase to at least 40% (ba­ conditions. 1993) seline: 26.6% in 1985) the pro­ The two studies reviewed by Synopsis portion of work sites employing Dr. Salazar in this column focus It is not unusual to overlook 50 or more people that provide on factors in the work environ­ the psychological aspects of work programs to reduce employee ment that influence health, spe­ site hazards; yet there is increas­ stress (National Survey of cifically job/task demands and ing evidence that the stresses of Worksite Health Promotion http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png AAOHN Journal SAGE

Chronic Demands and Responsivity to Challenge (Schaubroeck, 1993)

AAOHN Journal , Volume 41 (12): 4 – Dec 1, 1993

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/chronic-demands-and-responsivity-to-challenge-schaubroeck-1993-A0ydS0DiC0

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 1993 American Association of Occupational Health Nurses
ISSN
0891-0162
DOI
10.1177/216507999304101208
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

LINKING PRACTICE & RES EAR C H SECTION EDITOR: SALLY L. LUSK, PhD, RN, FAAN Job Stress ea lt h y People 2000 reactions or illness. The model of Occupational Health Nursing (DHHS, 1991), the fed­ stress and health (Figure) pre­ job The University of Michigan H eral guideline for im­ sented by Hurrell (NIOSH, 1987) School ofNursing proving the health of our nation, depicts relationships among job Ann Arbor, MI focuses on a number of work site stressors, other factors, and ad­ CHRONIC DEMANDS AND health issues. The identified verse outcomes and is helpful to RESPONSIVITY TO goal in relation to stress is to keep in mind when analyzing job CHALLENGE (Schaubroeck, increase to at least 40% (ba­ conditions. 1993) seline: 26.6% in 1985) the pro­ The two studies reviewed by Synopsis portion of work sites employing Dr. Salazar in this column focus It is not unusual to overlook 50 or more people that provide on factors in the work environ­ the psychological aspects of work programs to reduce employee ment that influence health, spe­ site hazards; yet there is increas­ stress (National Survey of cifically job/task demands and ing evidence that the stresses of Worksite Health Promotion

Journal

AAOHN JournalSAGE

Published: Dec 1, 1993

There are no references for this article.