Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Book Review: Toxicology of Chemical Respiratory Hypersensitivity

Book Review: Toxicology of Chemical Respiratory Hypersensitivity BOOK REVIEWS fluids and solids kinetics in haemodialysis, the cyclophosphamide at the tumour site. This mechanical evaluation of spondylolysis, and the approach causes less bone marrow suppression simulation of back pain. than is generally the case with cyclophosphamide The use of other model simulations, such as alone. those for three-dimensional models of tumour I found this book deficient in one sense - it growth and the simulation of the dynamics of neu­ lacks an overview of GST nomenclature and, ron degeneration in motor neurone disease, would throughout the volume, various GST naming sys­ seem to have more direct relevance for acting as tems are used. Hence, it could be difficult to follow replacements for laboratory animal experiments. for a reader who is unfamiliar with the various There are also chapters on modelling bone regen­ nomenclatures. eration and modelling the effects of bone implants From the standpoint of a worker in in vitro tox­ and prostheses, which will be relevant for those icology, the GSTs represent a much neglected area working on biocompatability. of research, especially when compared to meta­ This text is for the specialist reader interested in bolic activation. Perhaps more consideration the potential of computerised and mathematical http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Alternatives to Laboratory Animals SAGE

Book Review: Toxicology of Chemical Respiratory Hypersensitivity

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals , Volume 25 (4): 2 – Jul 1, 1997

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/book-review-toxicology-of-chemical-respiratory-hypersensitivity-aJKoBk2Uen

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 1997 Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments
ISSN
0261-1929
eISSN
2632-3559
DOI
10.1177/026119299702500414
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

BOOK REVIEWS fluids and solids kinetics in haemodialysis, the cyclophosphamide at the tumour site. This mechanical evaluation of spondylolysis, and the approach causes less bone marrow suppression simulation of back pain. than is generally the case with cyclophosphamide The use of other model simulations, such as alone. those for three-dimensional models of tumour I found this book deficient in one sense - it growth and the simulation of the dynamics of neu­ lacks an overview of GST nomenclature and, ron degeneration in motor neurone disease, would throughout the volume, various GST naming sys­ seem to have more direct relevance for acting as tems are used. Hence, it could be difficult to follow replacements for laboratory animal experiments. for a reader who is unfamiliar with the various There are also chapters on modelling bone regen­ nomenclatures. eration and modelling the effects of bone implants From the standpoint of a worker in in vitro tox­ and prostheses, which will be relevant for those icology, the GSTs represent a much neglected area working on biocompatability. of research, especially when compared to meta­ This text is for the specialist reader interested in bolic activation. Perhaps more consideration the potential of computerised and mathematical

Journal

Alternatives to Laboratory AnimalsSAGE

Published: Jul 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.