Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Book Review: The School Counsellor, Counselling for What?

Book Review: The School Counsellor, Counselling for What? BOOK REVIEWS includq ranlung and clustering, the authors conclude rather sorrowfully that all subjects showed “very wide general acceptance of all the objectives”. They complain that “This blanket approval of anything that smacks of psychology and children is, of course. the major problem ”, but they do not have the time to question “ such an indiscriminate acceptance ”. It appears that tutors, and students at the end of their third year of training, are uniformly sympathetic towards objectives of this kind. One wonders what such a survey would find in this part of the world. The second survey used a Likert-type scale to check attitudes towards educational psychology. Again students and teachers showed a uniformly favourable attitude and a general acceptance that educational psychology has a useful contribution to make to the training of teachers. With the theoretical and experimental justifications taken care of, the way is now cleared to launch the book’s most important contribution, the course in educational psychology for teacher trainees set out in terms of specific objectives. Though this reviewer was convinced by the theoretical debate and as favourably inclined as the people surveyed towards specific objectives and educational psychology, he was doubly shocked http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Education SAGE

Book Review: The School Counsellor, Counselling for What?

Australian Journal of Education , Volume 18 (3): 3 – Oct 1, 1974

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/book-review-the-school-counsellor-counselling-for-what-al5k0Rqd0d

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 1974 Australian Council for Educational Research
ISSN
0004-9441
eISSN
2050-5884
DOI
10.1177/000494417401800314
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

BOOK REVIEWS includq ranlung and clustering, the authors conclude rather sorrowfully that all subjects showed “very wide general acceptance of all the objectives”. They complain that “This blanket approval of anything that smacks of psychology and children is, of course. the major problem ”, but they do not have the time to question “ such an indiscriminate acceptance ”. It appears that tutors, and students at the end of their third year of training, are uniformly sympathetic towards objectives of this kind. One wonders what such a survey would find in this part of the world. The second survey used a Likert-type scale to check attitudes towards educational psychology. Again students and teachers showed a uniformly favourable attitude and a general acceptance that educational psychology has a useful contribution to make to the training of teachers. With the theoretical and experimental justifications taken care of, the way is now cleared to launch the book’s most important contribution, the course in educational psychology for teacher trainees set out in terms of specific objectives. Though this reviewer was convinced by the theoretical debate and as favourably inclined as the people surveyed towards specific objectives and educational psychology, he was doubly shocked

Journal

Australian Journal of EducationSAGE

Published: Oct 1, 1974

There are no references for this article.