Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Robert Kurzban, A. Dukes, Jason Weeden (2010)
Sex, drugs and moral goals: reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugsProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277
Martin Levinson (2006)
Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution
D. Krebs (2003)
Fictions and facts about evolutionary approaches to human behavior: comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003).Psychological bulletin, 129 6
T. Dobzhansky (1973)
Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution, 75
P. Smith (1871)
The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to SexGlasgow Medical Journal, 3
Robert Kurzban (2011)
Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind
R. Trivers (1971)
The Evolution of Reciprocal AltruismThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 46
R. Lickliter, H. Honeycutt (2003)
Developmental dynamics: toward a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology.Psychological bulletin, 129 6
G. Miller (2007)
SEXUAL SELECTION FOR MORAL VIRTUESThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 82
J. Tybur, D. Lieberman, Vladas Griskevicius, Angela Bryan, Steven Gangestad, Dan Fessler, Geoffrey Miller, M. Tybur (2009)
PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Microbes , Mating , and Morality : Individual Differences in Three Functional Domains of Disgust
J. Tybur, S. Gangestad (2011)
Mate preferences and infectious disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humansPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366
Jason Weeden, A. Cohen, D. Kenrick (2008)
Religious Attendance as Reproductive Support.Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, 29 5
D. Kenrick (2006)
Evolutionary psychology: Resistance is futilePsychological Inquiry, 17
J. Haidt (2001)
The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological review, 108 4
Evolutionary Psychology www.epjournal.net – 2012. 10(1): 35-38 ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Book Review Nothing in Morality Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution A Review of Dennis Krebs, The Origins of Morality: An Evolutionary Account. Oxford University Press: New York, USA, 2011, 320 pp., US$49.95, ISBN 978-0199778232 (hardback). Joshua M. Tybur, Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, Email: j.m.tybur@vu.nl. Theodosius Dobzhansky (1973) famously opined that nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. In The Origins of Morality: An Evolutionary Account, Dennis Krebs argues that the scientific study of morality is as muddled as biology without an evolutionary framework. st Krebs prefaces the book by noting that he is not writing with you, the 21 century reader, in mind. Instead, he is writing for an audience of one: a white-bearded Charles Darwin, who must familiarize himself with 130 years of theoretical developments since he shared his thoughts on morality in The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (1874). As such, the book offers an excellent summary of many of the epistemological underpinnings of contemporary evolutionary psychology. And, perhaps as a courtesy to Mr. Darwin, it does so without any of
Evolutionary Psychology – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.