Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Book Review: Consent to Treatment

Book Review: Consent to Treatment Book Review Title: Consent to Treatment which the doctor thinks unsafe, or on conditions which make him reluctant to accept responsibility for her con­ Author: Medical Defence Union finement, he should say so and, ifpossible, refer her to a Publisher: Medical Defence Union, London, 1986 colleague. It is important to establish a mutual Australian Distributor: understanding so that the patient consents to the obstetri­ The Australasian Medical Defence Union, cian taking those steps which he thinks necessary for the Level 9, 83 Clarence Street, safety of the patient and her child. Sydney, NSW, 2000 Although this is a great advance on the earlier booklet, the last sentence is unclear. Does it mean that, having agreed to be a patient of Doctor X because, in general, the The Australian Medical Record Journal of December ideas of the doctor and patient are compatible, the patient 1982 (Kearsey, 1982) carried a review of certain publications can be assumed to have given a blanket consent to any of the Medical Defence Union (MDU). While the procedure which Doctor X "thinks necessary"; or does it publications were generally considered useful, some con­ mean that an agreement has been reached before confine­ cerns were raised http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Medical Record Journal SAGE

Book Review: Consent to Treatment

Australian Medical Record Journal , Volume 18 (1): 2 – Mar 1, 1988

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/book-review-consent-to-treatment-HP7HAW5bAW

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 1988 Health Information Management Association of Australia Limited
ISSN
0817-3907
eISSN
1833-3575
DOI
10.1177/183335838801800112
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Book Review Title: Consent to Treatment which the doctor thinks unsafe, or on conditions which make him reluctant to accept responsibility for her con­ Author: Medical Defence Union finement, he should say so and, ifpossible, refer her to a Publisher: Medical Defence Union, London, 1986 colleague. It is important to establish a mutual Australian Distributor: understanding so that the patient consents to the obstetri­ The Australasian Medical Defence Union, cian taking those steps which he thinks necessary for the Level 9, 83 Clarence Street, safety of the patient and her child. Sydney, NSW, 2000 Although this is a great advance on the earlier booklet, the last sentence is unclear. Does it mean that, having agreed to be a patient of Doctor X because, in general, the The Australian Medical Record Journal of December ideas of the doctor and patient are compatible, the patient 1982 (Kearsey, 1982) carried a review of certain publications can be assumed to have given a blanket consent to any of the Medical Defence Union (MDU). While the procedure which Doctor X "thinks necessary"; or does it publications were generally considered useful, some con­ mean that an agreement has been reached before confine­ cerns were raised

Journal

Australian Medical Record JournalSAGE

Published: Mar 1, 1988

There are no references for this article.