Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Book Review: Archives of Toxicology, Supplement 17: Toxicology in Transition

Book Review: Archives of Toxicology, Supplement 17: Toxicology in Transition 437 BOOK REVIEWS natives were not available". Since comprehensive The proceedings offer some interesting ideas and information about alternatives is not easily access­ bits of information, which are not developed in the ible and since ACUC members are unlikely to be text. A few of the major contributions include lists fully conversant with alternatives developments in of references, but most do not. Although described all areas of science in which project proposals are as "edited transcriptions of the presentations ... ", submitted, this caveat may not mean too much. there is little evidence of editorial rigour, with Conscientious discharge of the function depends quirks of grammar, colloquialisms and unconven­ upon the integrity of individual Pis (who are tional use of symbols being commonplace. There assumed to know or be able to find out about alter­ are also spelling or typographical errors, including natives in their own field) which ACUCs must take "What is a Morale Mandate?" in the Table of Con­ on trust. tents. Overall, I found this to be a disappointing However, the Symposium was not organised, nor document, and not only because it did not answer were the proceedings published, in order to answer my original question http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Alternatives to Laboratory Animals SAGE

Book Review: Archives of Toxicology, Supplement 17: Toxicology in Transition

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals , Volume 23 (3): 2 – May 1, 1995

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/book-review-archives-of-toxicology-supplement-17-toxicology-in-Wnxlrg6u74

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 1995 Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments
ISSN
0261-1929
eISSN
2632-3559
DOI
10.1177/026119299502300321
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

437 BOOK REVIEWS natives were not available". Since comprehensive The proceedings offer some interesting ideas and information about alternatives is not easily access­ bits of information, which are not developed in the ible and since ACUC members are unlikely to be text. A few of the major contributions include lists fully conversant with alternatives developments in of references, but most do not. Although described all areas of science in which project proposals are as "edited transcriptions of the presentations ... ", submitted, this caveat may not mean too much. there is little evidence of editorial rigour, with Conscientious discharge of the function depends quirks of grammar, colloquialisms and unconven­ upon the integrity of individual Pis (who are tional use of symbols being commonplace. There assumed to know or be able to find out about alter­ are also spelling or typographical errors, including natives in their own field) which ACUCs must take "What is a Morale Mandate?" in the Table of Con­ on trust. tents. Overall, I found this to be a disappointing However, the Symposium was not organised, nor document, and not only because it did not answer were the proceedings published, in order to answer my original question

Journal

Alternatives to Laboratory AnimalsSAGE

Published: May 1, 1995

There are no references for this article.