Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Charis Cussins (1996)
Ontological Choreography: Agency through Objectification in Infertility ClinicsSocial Studies of Science, 26
(2003)
A new consultation management process for managing divergent community views: Lesbian and single women's access to artificial insemination and ART's
L. Andrews (1989)
Alternative Modes of Reproduction
A. Strauss (1987)
Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists
J. Edwards (1991)
New Conceptions: Biosocial Innovations and the Family.Journal of Marriage and Family, 53
Janice Ciccarelli, L. Beckman (2005)
Navigating rough waters: an overview of psychological aspects of surrogacy.The Journal of social issues, 61 1
R. Parke (2004)
Development in the family.Annual review of psychology, 55
Barrie Thorne, M. Yalom (1984)
Rethinking The Family: Some Feminist Questions
Gena Corea (1985)
The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs
J. Lorber (1998)
Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics
C. Woodsong, L. Severy (2005)
Generation of Knowledge for Reproductive Health Technologies: Constraints on Social and Behavioral ResearchJournal of Social Issues, 61
S. Bem (1993)
The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality
K. Marx, M. Cain, A. Hunt, Friedrich Engels (1979)
Marx and Engels on law
A. Zucker (1999)
The Psychological Impact of Reproductive Difficulties on Women's LivesSex Roles, 40
(1987)
Baby M, family love and the market in women
(2003)
Should there be limits on who may access assisted reproductive services ? A legal perspective
Erin Macdonald (1999)
Engendering Motherhood: Identity and Self-Transformation in Women's LivesJournal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement, 1
B. Rothman (1987)
COMMENT ON HARRISON:Gender & Society, 1
John Ciccarelli, Janice Ciccarelli (2005)
The legal aspects of parental rights in assisted reproductive technology.The Journal of social issues, 61 1
Lisa McIntyre (1994)
Law In The Sociological Enterprise: A Reconstruction
(1987)
Why a surrogate mother should have the right to change her mind: A feminist analysis
C. Kindregan, M. McBrien (2006)
Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Lawyer's Guide to Emerging Law and Science
Ralph Brashier (2004)
Inheritance Law and the Evolving Family
Linda Beckman, S. Harvey (2005)
Current reproductive technologies: increased access and choice?The Journal of social issues, 61 1
N. Chodorow (1978)
The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender
R. Ginzberg (1989)
Feminist Thought: A Comprehensive IntroductionTeaching Philosophy, 12
S. Golombok, R. Cook, A. Bish, C. Murray (1995)
Families created by the new reproductive technologies: quality of parenting and social and emotional development of the children.Child development, 66 2
R. Jacoby (1971)
The Dialectic of SexTelos, 1971
J. Fitzmaurice (1998)
Economy and Society
PhD, is a professor in the Department of Sociology
B. Bennett (2003)
Choosing a child's future? Reproductive decision-making and preimplantation genetic diagnosis
of the State of Ariz
Helena Ragone (1994)
Surrogate Motherhood: Conception In The Heart
C. Shalev (1989)
Birth Power: The Case for Surrogacy
M. Young (1995)
Reproductive technologies and the law: Norplant and the bad mother.Marriage & family review, 21 3-4
K. Llewellyn (1949)
Law and the Social Sciences--Especially SociologyAmerican Sociological Review, 14
Mardy Ireland (1993)
Reconceiving Women: Separating Motherhood from Female Identity
K. Blankenship, B. Rushing, S. Onorato, Renée White (1993)
REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND THE U.S. COURTSGender & Society, 7
M. Ferree (1990)
Beyond Separate Spheres: Feminism and Family Research.Journal of Marriage and Family, 52
P. Chesler (1988)
Sacred Bond: The Legacy of Baby M
V. Shapiro, J. Shapiro, I. Paret, N. Webb (2001)
Complex Adoption and Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Developmental Approach to Clinical Practice
A. Rich (1976)
Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution
(1999)
Families and law (pp
(1990)
The future of motherhood: Some unfashionably visionary thoughts
A. Oakley (1975)
Woman's Work: The Housewife, Past and Present
J. Daar (2006)
Reproductive Technologies and the Law
M. Harrison (1987)
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF MARY BETH WHITEHEADGender & Society, 1
M. Giménez (1991)
THE MODE OF REPRODUCTION IN TRANSITION:Gender & Society, 5
I. Marcus (1990)
A Sexy New Twist: Reproductive Technologies and FeminismLaw & Social Inquiry, 15
(1987)
On the problem of surrogate motherhood: Analyzing the Baby M case
C. Brodsky (1968)
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative ResearchPsychosomatics, 9
P. Donovan (1986)
New reproductive technologies: some legal dilemmas.Family planning perspectives, 18 2
R. Tong (1989)
Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction
American society has typically associated motherhood with biology. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART's) challenge this view by fragmenting motherhood into the social, the genetic, and the gestational. To ascertain the extent to which such a challenge has actually succeeded in changing societal understandings of motherhood, this study explored court cases involving four types of ART's. The findings suggest that although these ART's have the potential to re-create societal conceptions of motherhood, such a change has yet to occur in toto. Rather, certain aspects of biological motherhood continue to be seen as more permanent than social motherhood.
Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work – SAGE
Published: Aug 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.