Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Fixsen, E. Phillips, Montrose Wolf (1972)
Achievement Place: the reliability of self-reporting and peer-reporting and their effects on behavior.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 5 1
Jodrell Rd, R. Sanson-Fisher (1975)
Basic concepts of behavior therapy: an experiment involving disturbed adolescent girls.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 29 10
D. Black, A. Reiss, (1970)
Police control of juveniles.American sociological review, 35 1
I. Piliavin, S. Briar (1964)
Police Encounters With JuvenilesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 70
W. Chambliss (1968)
Crime and the legal process
A. Passow, M. Goldberg, A. Tannenbaum (1967)
Education of the disadvantaged : a book of readings
H. Myerhoff, B. Myerhoff (1964)
Field Observations of Middle Class “Gangs”Social Forces, 42
G. Bateson, D. Jackson, J. Haley, J. Weakland (2007)
Toward a theory of schizophreniaSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 1
Martin Haskell (1960)
Toward a Reference Group Theory of Juvenile DelinquencySocial Problems, 8
D. Rafky, R. Sealey (1975)
The Adolescent and the Law: A SurveyCrime & Delinquency, 21
M. Erickson (1971)
The Group Context of Delinquent BehaviorSocial Problems, 19
T. Vinson, R. Homel (1975)
CRIME AND DISADVANTAGE The coincidence of medical and social problems in an Australian cityBritish Journal of Criminology, 15
H. Marshall, R. Purdy (1972)
Hidden Deviance and the Labelling Approach: The Case for Drinking and DrivingSocial Problems, 19
E. Markson, J. Mercer (1974)
Labelling the Mentally Retarded.Contemporary Sociology, 3
J. Cobb, H. Hops (1973)
Effects of Academic Survival Skill Training On Low Achieving First Graders1Journal of Educational Research, 67
N. Goldman (1963)
The differential selection juvenile offenders of court appearance
AUST & NZ JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY (June 1978) 11{71-80) 71 ABORIGINES IN CRIME STATISTICS AN INTERACTION BETWEEN POVERTY AND DETECTORS R Sanson-Fisher" The over representation of Aboriginals, and to a lesser extent low socio-economic whites in criminal statistics has received wide publicity and has been the subject of a number of studies (Eggleston 1971, Sanson-Fisher 1975). In a recent survey of juvenile institutions in Western Australia (Sanson-Fisher et al 1976) it was found that Aboriginals were 38.9~ of the sample although they represent approximately 2~ of the total population in that State. This paper attempts to examine some of the possible reasons for this massive over representation of the Aboriginal group in official crime statistics and in doing so introduces the concept of the behavioural matrix, a derivative of the labelling theory of detection. Detection Process There are two major approaches to delinquency detection present in the literature (Marshall & Purdy 1971). The first is the impartial model which assumes a one-to-one relationship between a deviant act (offending) and detection. This model assumes that the offender is only represented in official statistics because he engaged in behaviour defined as deviant by the legal code. Given this approach the purpose
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 1978
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.