Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Grabbe, T. Schwarz (1996)
Immunoregulatory mechanisms involved in elicitation of allergic contact hypersensitivity.Immunology today, 19 1
D. Basketter, G. Gerberick, I. Kimber, S. Loveless (1996)
The local lymph node assay: a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 34 10
J. Hostynek,, P. Magee, H. Maibach (1996)
QSAR predictive of contact allergy: scope and limitations.Current problems in dermatology, 25
A. Kligman (1966)
The identification of contact allergens by human assay. I. A critique of standard methods.The Journal of investigative dermatology, 47 5
F. Pistoor, Anura, Rambukkana, M. Kroezen, J. Lepoittevin, J. Bos, M. Kapsenberg, P. Das (1996)
Novel predictive assay for contact allergens using human skin explant cultures.The American journal of pathology, 149 1
S. Gad, B. Dunn, D. Dobbs, C. Reilly, R. Walsh (1986)
Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST).Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 84 1
E. Nettis, M. Colanardi, A. Soccio, A. Ferrannini, A. Tursi (2002)
Occupational irritant and allergic contact dermatitis among healthcare workersContact Dermatitis, 46
N. Cox (1994)
Allergy to benzalkonium chloride simulating dermatomyositisContact Dermatitis, 31
S. Loveless, Gregory Ladies, G. Gerberick, C. Ryan, D. Basketter, E. Scholes, R. House, J. Hilton, R. Dearman, I. Kimber (1996)
Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial.Toxicology, 108 1-2
D. Basketter, R. Dearman, J. Hilton, I. Kimber (1997)
Dinitrohalobenzenes: evaluation of relative skin sensitization potential using the local lymph node assayContact Dermatitis, 36
C. Noorden, I. Vogels (1989)
Cytophotometric analysis of reaction rates of succinate and lactate dehydrogenase activity in rat liver, heart muscle and tracheal epitheliumThe Histochemical Journal, 21
Thomas Rustemeyer, M. Preuss, B. Blomberg, Pranal Das, R. Scheper (2003)
Comparison of two in vitro dendritic cell maturation models for screening contact sensitizers using a panel of methacrylatesExperimental Dermatology, 12
Phil Moffitt (1994)
A METHYL GREEN‐PYRONIN TECHNIQUE FOR DEMONSTRATING CELL DEATH IN THE MURINE TUMOUR S180Cell Biology International, 18
Y. Kanazawa, Takemi Yoshida, Kohichi Kojima (1999)
Structure‐activity relationships in allergic contact dermatitis induced by methacrylatesContact Dermatitis, 40
E. Lochem, M. Keur, A. Mommaas, G. Gast, E. Goulmy (1996)
Functional expression of minor histocompatibility antigens on human peripheral blood dendritic cells and epidermal Langerhans cells.Transplant immunology, 4 2
A. Kligman (1966)
Full Length ReportThe Identification of Contact Allergens by Human Assay: III. The Maximization Test: A Procedure for Screening and Rating Contact Sensitizers*Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 47
O. Silva, D. Basketter, M. Barratt, E. Corsini, M. Cronin, P. Das, J. Degwert, A. Enk, J. Garrigue, C. Hauser, I. Kimber, J. Lepoittevin, J. Peguet, M. Ponec (1996)
Alternative Methods for Skin Sensitisation TestingAlternatives to Laboratory Animals, 24
J. Jacobs, C. Lehé, K. Cammans, P. Das, G. Elliott (2002)
An in vitro model for detecting skin irritants: methyl green-pyronine staining of human skin explant cultures.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 16 5
D. Hart (1997)
Dendritic cells: unique leukocyte populations which control the primary immune response.Blood, 90 9
François Och, W. Slob, W. Jong, R. Vandebriel, H. Loveren (2000)
A quantitative method for assessing the sensitizing potency of low molecular weight chemicals using a local lymph node assay: employment of a regression method that includes determination of the uncertainty margins.Toxicology, 146 1
J. Hilton, I. Kimber (1995)
The murine local lymph node assay.Methods in molecular biology, 43
I. Kimber, R. Dearman (2002)
Allergic contact dermatitis: the cellular effectorsContact Dermatitis, 46
J. Jacobs, C. Lehé, K. Cammans, P. Das, G. Elliott (2000)
Methyl Green-Pyronine Staining of Porcine Organotypic Skin Explant Cultures: An Alternative Model for Screening for Skin IrritantsAlternatives to Laboratory Animals, 28
J. Wahlberg, H. Maibach (1980)
Nonanoic acid irritation ‐ A positive control at routine patch testing?Contact Dermatitis, 6
J. Jacobs, C. Lehé, K. Cammans, K. Yoneda, P. Das, G. Elliott (2001)
An automated method for the quantification of immunostained human Langerhans cells.Journal of immunological methods, 247 1-2
D. Basketter, D. Roberts, M. Crown (1992)
The value of the local lymph node assay in quantitative structure‐activity investigationsContact Dermatitis, 27
M. Cella, F. Sallusto, A. Lanzavecchia (1997)
Origin, maturation and antigen presenting function of dendritic cells.Current opinion in immunology, 9 1
A. Kligman, W. Epstein (1975)
Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergensContact Dermatitis, 1
C. Mathias, H. Maibach (1978)
Dermatotoxicology monographs I. Cutaneous irritation: factors influencing the response to irritants.Clinical toxicology, 13 3
A. Rambukkana, J. Bos, D. Irik, Menko Wj, M. Kapsenberg, Pranal Das (1995)
In situ behavior of human Langerhans cells in skin organ culture.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 73 4
François Och, R. Vandebriel, M. Prinsen, W. Jong, W. Slob, H. Loveren (2001)
Comparison of dose-responses of contact allergens using the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay.Toxicology, 167 3
D. Basketter, L. Lea, K. Cooper, J. Stocks, A. Dickens, I. Pate, R. Dearman, I. Kimber (1999)
Threshold for classification as a skin sensitizer in the local lymph node assay: a statistical evaluation.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 37 12
J. Britton, S. Wilkinson, J. English, D. Gawkrodger, A. Ormerod, J. Sansom, S. Shaw, B. Statham (2003)
The British standard series of contact dermatitis allergens: validation in clinical practice and value for clinical governanceBritish Journal of Dermatology, 148
B. Magnusson, A. Kligman (1969)
The Identification of Contact Allergens by Animal Assay. the Guinea Pig Maximization TestJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 52
J. Wahlberg, A. Boman (1985)
Guinea pig maximization test.Current problems in dermatology, 14
J. Montelius, H. Wahlkvist, A. Boman, J. Wahlberg (1998)
Murine local lymph node assay for predictive testing of allergenicity: two irritants caused significant proliferation.Acta dermato-venereologica, 78 6
(2003)
Allergenicity assessment of methacrylates by human Langerhans cell migration and maturation
J. Ridings, M. Barratt, R. Cary, C. Earnshaw, C. Eggington, M. Ellis, P. Judson, J. Langowski, C. Marchant, M. Payne, W. Watson, T. Yih (1996)
Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure: an update on the DEREK system.Toxicology, 106 1-3
Animal models are considered to be the “gold standard” for determining the potential contact allergenicity of low molecular weight chemicals. However, governmental regulations and ethical considerations limit the use of animals for such purposes. There is therefore a need for in vitro alternative models. The human organotypic skin explant culture (HOSEC) model is reported to be a promising alternative method for the predictive testing of contact allergens. The accelerated migration of Langerhans cells from the epidermis upon exposure to contact allergens is used to identify chemicals that are potentially capable of inducing a delayed-type hypersensitivity. In the study described in this paper, the model was further refined, and used, in two independent laboratories, to screen 23 low molecular weight compounds of known classification for their allergenicity. Each laboratory was able to accurately detect the contact allergens, despite small variations in the protocols used. However, the classification of dermal irritants, which have often been falsely classified as allergens, varied between the two laboratories. Despite the current limitations of the HOSEC model, the accuracy of the predictions made (sensitiser or non-sensitiser) compare favourably with classifications obtained with commonly used animal models. The HOSEC model has the potential to be developed further as an in vitro alternative to animal models for screening for contact allergens.
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals – SAGE
Published: Nov 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.