Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
University of Chicago Specialization: Inde pendent study
L. Shulman (1965)
Seeking Styles and Individual Differences in Patterns of InquiryThe School Review, 73
G. Miller, E. Galanter, K. Pribram (1960)
Plans and the structure of behavior
(1962)
The Elementary School Training Program in Scientific Inquiry
J. Allender (1968)
THE TEACHING OF INQUIRY SKILLS TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN. FINAL REPORT.
Inquiry Training: Building Skills for Autonomous Discovery
L. Shulman (1968)
Studies of the Inquiry Process; Inquiry Patterns of Students in Teacher-Training Programs. Final Report.
(1912)
Address: Department of General Educational Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pa
Ray Hyman, H. Schroder, M. Driver, S. Streufert (1970)
Human Information Processing: Individuals and Groups Functioning in Complex SituationsAmerican Journal of Psychology, 83
A. Battersby (1968)
Plans and the Structure of BehaviorJournal of the Operational Research Society, 19
J. Kagan (1966)
Reflection--impulsivity: the generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo.Journal of abnormal psychology, 71 1
A Study of Inquiry Activity in Elementary School Children1 JEROM E S. ALLENDER Temple University Recent research reports (Schroder, Driver, and Streufert, 1967; Shulman, 1965; Shulman, Loupe, and Piper, 1968) have shown that huma n inquiry as a complete process is amenable to systematic study. Earlier research (Suchman, 1961; Suchman, 1962) investigated a single aspect of inquiry activity in elementary school students, i.e., question asking, but a general study of children was needed. Two models were explored for their applicability in the development of a task that would be appropriate for elementary school students. Miller, Galanter, and Pribram (1960) theorized that an organism's behavior was based on test-operate-test-exit units which they called TOTEs. Extrapolating on the basis of their model, a complete inquiry could take place if materials were available which allowed children to test for incon- gruencies and if a set of data were present on which they could operate. Exiting would consist of deciding on some resolution to the incongruency to which a student had chosen to respond. The way to create operable materials was further elucidated by Shulman (1965). He presented a model which distinguished four components of human inquiry—problem sensitivity, problem formulation, search behavior and
American Educational Research Journal – SAGE
Published: Jun 24, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.