Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/a-reply-to-buckingham-s-newsmaking-criminology-or-infotainment-LJ97Tjjjpw
References (31)
-
M. Szinovacz (1983)
Using Couple Data as a Methodological Tool: The Case of Marital Violence.Journal of Marriage and Family, 45
-
(1997)
Race, gender and the sentencing process: A study of sentencing in the District Court of New Zealand -
(1983)
Gender and crime: Offense patterns and criminal court sentencing -
Poor research marrs [sic] overview of crime -
(2000)
Review of Crime in New Zealand -
Samantha Jeffries (2001)
Gender judgments: an investigation of gender differentiation in sentencing and remand in New Zealand -
Report on violence: The research does not support the conclusions -
G. Dennehy, G. Newbold (2001)
The girls in the gang -
(2000)
Neither new nor bold: A response to the material on rape -
M. Bograd (1990)
Why We Need Gender to Understand Human ViolenceJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 5
-
R. Mcneely, C. Mann (1990)
Domestic Violence Is a Human IssueJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 5
-
S. Steinmetz (1978)
The battered husband syndrome., 2
-
M. Straus, R. Gelles (1986)
Societal Change and Change in Family Violence from 1975 to 1985 As Revealed by Two National SurveysJournal of Marriage and Family, 48
-
(1977)
The bashed husband syndrome -
(2000)
Greg Newbold’s response to reviews of Crime in New Zealand -
L. Berliner (1990)
Domestic ViolenceJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 5
-
E. McDaniel (1992)
Women, Violence, and Social ChangeJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 20
-
Samantha Jeffries, G. Fletcher, G. Newbold (2003)
Pathways to sex-based differentiation in criminal court sentencing -
J. Makepeace (1986)
Gender Differences in Courtship Violence Victimization.Family Relations, 35
-
(2000)
Crime in New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore -
J. Leibrich, J. Paulin, R. Ransom (1995)
Hitting home: men speak about abuse of women partners. -
(2000)
Crime in New Zealand -
Rafter, Nicole Hahn (1982)
Judge, Lawyer, Victim, Thief: Women, Gender Roles And Criminal Justice -
Lynn Magdol, T. Moffitt, A. Caspi, D. Newman, J. Fagan, Phil Silva (1997)
Gender differences in partner violence in a birth cohort of 21-year-olds: bridging the gap between clinical and epidemiological approaches.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 65 1
-
K. O'Leary, J. Barling, I. Arias, A. Rosenbaum, Jeanette Malone, A. Tyree (1989)
Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: a longitudinal analysis.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 57 2
-
J. Langley, Judy Martin, S. Nada-Raja (1997)
Physical Assault Among 21-Year-Olds by PartnersJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 12
-
(2000)
2000a, March 17). Poor research marrs [sic] overview of crime -
E. Butler, L. Winfree, G. Newbold (2003)
Policing and Gender: Male and Female Perspectives among Members of the New Zealand PolicePolice Quarterly, 6
-
Kathleen Daly, Rebecca Bordt (1995)
Sex effects and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literatureJustice Quarterly, 12
-
(1999)
Sentencing in New Zealand: A statistical study. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Justice -
(1982)
Are females treated differently? A review of theories and evidence on sentencing and parole decisions
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- Copyright © by SAGE Publications
- ISSN
- 0004-8658
- eISSN
- 1837-9273
- DOI
- 10.1375/acri.37.2.276
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
AbstractThis edition of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology carries an article by Judith Buckingham dedicated to discrediting my criminology and, via me, the PhD thesis of my former student, Samantha Jeffries. Inter alia, I am accused of hijacking the public consciousness of New Zealand through a dominating presence in the news media, of negatively influencing the Jeffries' PhD, and of writing a book called Crime in New Zealand which erroneously depicts women's role in domestic violence and their treatment by the criminal justice system. In this response to Buckingham's attack, I argue that she has made unsupportable claims in relation to my influence in the news media, has completely misunderstood Jeffries' thesis, has distorted, misreported, misconstrued and misrepresented the content of Crime in New Zealand and has accused me of making errors when a check of the facts shows that the errors are her own. She has given false meanings to things I have said and defaced me by focusing on small, decontextualised fragments of writing and ignoring the bulk of my work.
Journal
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology – SAGE
Published: Aug 1, 2004