Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Reflective Practice of Evaluation

A Reflective Practice of Evaluation How and Why? Boyd E. Rossing and Tim P. Neuman or many good reasons adult educators designed to help such leaders explore the meaning of the have become quite interested in the emerging age, ground their actions in a philosophy of idea of critical reflection on one’s prac- leadership, and develop strategies for guiding their or- tie. This perspective is increasingiy ganizations in renewing their directions and effective- advocated as a guiding premise for education of profes- ness. A core capacity in this approach is the ability to sionals and others. I’ve had an opportunity recently to reflect regularly on one’s beliefs, feeling, and actions explore the implications of critical reflection for the prac- in changing contexts. tice of program evaluation. While evaluation and critical I’d like to share the outlines of the evaluation design reflection would Seem to have a pat deal to offer each that is steadily emerging in NEID. The evaluation is other my experience has been that very few evaluation based on engaging stakeholders in pmxxws of inquiry efforts embody critical reflection and that the literature and reflection that yield dynamic new understandings on critical reflection niakes scant reference to program that inform ongoing judgments, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Adult Learning SAGE

A Reflective Practice of Evaluation

Adult Learning , Volume 5 (2): 2 – Nov 1, 1993

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/a-reflective-practice-of-evaluation-O7rOT0UOmd

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 1993 American Association for Adult and Continuing Education
ISSN
1045-1595
eISSN
2162-4070
DOI
10.1177/104515959300500212
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

How and Why? Boyd E. Rossing and Tim P. Neuman or many good reasons adult educators designed to help such leaders explore the meaning of the have become quite interested in the emerging age, ground their actions in a philosophy of idea of critical reflection on one’s prac- leadership, and develop strategies for guiding their or- tie. This perspective is increasingiy ganizations in renewing their directions and effective- advocated as a guiding premise for education of profes- ness. A core capacity in this approach is the ability to sionals and others. I’ve had an opportunity recently to reflect regularly on one’s beliefs, feeling, and actions explore the implications of critical reflection for the prac- in changing contexts. tice of program evaluation. While evaluation and critical I’d like to share the outlines of the evaluation design reflection would Seem to have a pat deal to offer each that is steadily emerging in NEID. The evaluation is other my experience has been that very few evaluation based on engaging stakeholders in pmxxws of inquiry efforts embody critical reflection and that the literature and reflection that yield dynamic new understandings on critical reflection niakes scant reference to program that inform ongoing judgments,

Journal

Adult LearningSAGE

Published: Nov 1, 1993

There are no references for this article.