Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Monahan, L. Walker (1988)
Social science research in law: A new paradigm.American Psychologist, 43
M. Boccaccini, S. Brodsky (2002)
Believability of expert and lay witnesses: Implications for trial consultationProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33
V. Smith (1991)
Impact of pretrial instruction on jurors' information processing and decision makingJournal of Applied Psychology, 76
Richard Redding, Marnita Floyd, Gary Hawk (2001)
What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: a survey of the courts and bar.Behavioral sciences & the law, 19 4
K. O’Brien, J. Goodman-Delahunty, J. Clough, J. Pratley (2008)
Factors Affecting Juror Satisfaction and Confidence in New South Wales, Victoria and South AustraliaTrends and issues in crime and criminal justice
D. Mackinnon, C. Lockwood, J. Hoffman, S. West, V. Sheets (2002)
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.Psychological methods, 7 1
V. Rose, J. Ogloff (2001)
Evaluating the Comprehensibility of Jury Instructions: A Method and an ExampleLaw and Human Behavior, 25
(1995)
When lawyers question children: Is justice served
Expert psychological evidence in CSA trials in New Zealand. Paper presented at the Children and the Courts ConferenceNational Judicial College
Neil Brewer, Kipling Williams (2005)
Psychology and law : an empirical perspective
B. Cutler, H. Dexter, Steven Penrod (1990)
Nonadversarial Methods for Sensitizing Jurors to Eyewitness EvidenceJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 20
A. Elwork, B. Sales, James Alfini (1977)
In Ignorance of the Law or in Light of It
(2007)
Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers
(2010)
The effect of expert evidence and judicial directions on enhancing the credibility of complainants in CSA trials.Behavioral
R. Baron, D. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 6
L. Duggan, M. Aubrey, E. Doherty, Peter Isquith, M. Levine, Janine Scheiner (1989)
The Credibility of Children as Witnesses in a Simulated Child Sex Abuse Trial
Yi Shao, S. Ceci (2011)
Adult credibility assessments of misinformed, deceptive and truthful childrenApplied Cognitive Psychology, 25
M. Brennan (1995)
The discourse of denial: Cross-examining child victim witnessesJournal of Pragmatics, 23
B. Dann, V. Hans, D. Kaye (2006)
Can Jury Trial Innovations Improve Juror Understanding of DNA EvidenceJudicature, 90
M. Kovera, R. Levy, E. Borgida, Steven Penrod (1994)
Expert testimony in child sexual abuse casesLaw and Human Behavior, 18
D. Cruse, B. Browne (1987)
Reasoning in a Jury Trial: The Influence of InstructionsJournal of General Psychology, 114
J. Goodman-Delahunty, A. Cossins, K. O’Brien (2010)
Enhancing the credibility of complainants in child sexual assault trials: the effect of expert evidence and judicial directions.Behavioral sciences & the law, 28 6
Dennis Devine, Laura Clayton, Benjamin Dunford, Rasmy Seying, Jennifer Pryce (2001)
Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7
N. Brekke, E. Borgida (1988)
Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55
J. Fitzgerald (2006)
Attrition of Sexual Offences from the New South Wales Criminal Justice System, TheBOCSAR NSW Crime and Justice Bulletins
D. Krauss, B. Sales (2001)
The Effects Of Clinical And Scientific Expert Testimony On Juror Decision Making In Capital SentencingPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 7
Jodi Quas, W. Thompson, K. Alison, Clarke Stewart (2005)
Do Jurors “Know” What Isn’t So About Child Witnesses?Law and Human Behavior, 29
Kristopher Preacher, A. Hayes (2004)
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation modelsBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36
Judy Cashmore, Lily Trimboli (2006)
Child sexual assault trials: A survey of juror perceptionsBOCSAR NSW Crime and Justice Bulletins
S. Kassin, L. Wrightsman (1979)
On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37
J. Monahan, L. Walker, G. Mitchell (2008)
Contextual Evidence of Gender Discrimination: The Ascendance of 'Social Frameworks'Evidence & Evidentiary Procedure eJournal
J. Monahan, L. Walker, G. Mitchell (2009)
The Limits of Social Framework EvidenceLaw, Probability and Risk, 8
R. Cush, Jane Delahunty (2006)
The Influence of Limiting Instructions on Processing and Judgments of Emotionally Evocative EvidencePsychiatry, Psychology and Law, 13
S. Morison, E. Greene (1992)
Juror and expert knowledge of child sexual abuse.Child abuse & neglect, 16 4
Natalie Gabora, N. Spaños, Amanda Joab (1993)
The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trialLaw and Human Behavior, 17
E. Greene (1988)
Judge's Instruction on Eyewitness Testimony: Evaluation and Revision1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18
A. Cossins (2008)
Children, Sexual Abuse and Suggestibility: What Laypeople Think They Know and What the Literature Tells UsPsychiatry, Psychology and Law, 15
G. Goodman, A. Tobey, J. Batterman-Faunce, H. Orcutt, Sherry Thomas, Cheryl Shapiro, Toby Sachsenmaier (1998)
Face-to-Face Confrontation: Effects of Closed-Circuit Technology on Children's Eyewitness Testimony and Jurors' DecisionsLaw and Human Behavior, 22
L. Forsterlee, I. Horowitz (1997)
Enhancing Juror Competence in a Complex TrialApplied Cognitive Psychology, 11
(2010)
Australian Evidence: A Principled Approach to the Common Law and the Uniform Acts, 5th edn. Sydney: LexisNexis
(2009)
Cross-examination in CSA trials: Evidentiary safeguard or an opportunity to confuse?
R. Roesch, S. Hart, J. Ogloff (1999)
Psychology and Law: The State Of The Discipline
A. Cossins, J. Goodman-Delahunty, K. O’Brien (2009)
Uncertainty and Misconceptions About Child Sexual Abuse: Implications for the Criminal Justice SystemPsychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16
J. Sanders (2001)
Kumho and How We KnowLaw and contemporary problems, 64
S. Ceci, D. Ross, M. Toglia (1989)
Perspectives on children's testimony.
James Calvert, Michelle Munsie-Benson (1999)
Public opinion and knowledge about childhood sexual abuse in a rural community.Child abuse & neglect, 23 7
M. Kovera, April Gresham, Eugene Borgida, Ellen Gray, Pamela Regan (1997)
Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis.The Journal of applied psychology, 82 1
M. Crowley, M. O'Callaghan, Peter Ball (1994)
The juridical impact of psychological expert testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trialLaw and Human Behavior, 18
(2008)
Child sexual abuse on trial in New Zealand. Paper presented at the Criminal Law SymposiumAuckland
(2008)
Specialised knowledge, the exclusionary discretions and reliability: Reassessing incriminating expert opinion evidence
Bianca Klettke, A. Graesser, Martine Powell (2009)
Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases : the effects of evidence, coherence and credentials on juror decision makingApplied Cognitive Psychology, 24
A. Redlich, J. Myers, G. Goodman, Jianjian Qin (2002)
A Comparison of Two Forms of Hearsay in Child Sexual Abuse CasesChild Maltreatment, 7
D. Shapiro (2002)
Renewing the scientist-practitioner model.Psychologist
M. Kovera, E. Borgida (1997)
Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Trials: The Admissibility of Psychological ScienceApplied Cognitive Psychology, 11
C. Schmidt, J. Brigham (1996)
Jurors' perceptions of child victim-witnesses in a simulated sexual abuse trialLaw and Human Behavior, 20
M. Kovera, R. Levy, E. Borgida
Effects of Expert Evidence Type and Cross-Examination*
Studies on the influence of expert evidence and judicial instructions in child sexual abuse (CSA) cases have produced mixed outcomes. Using repeated measures, we tested the effectiveness of expert evidence and judicial directions in challenging common misconceptions about children’s memory and responses to sexual abuse. A CSA Misconceptions Questionnaire was administered to 118 psychology undergraduates who later served as virtual jurors in a simulated criminal trial. Specialized CSA knowledge was provided by a psychologist or via judicial directions. Expert evidence had two levels: clinical versus scientific testimony. Timing of judicial instructions had two levels: directions presented before the child testified versus during the judge’s summing up. In a fifth control condition, no specialized CSA information was included. After reading a trial transcript, mock-jurors assessed witness credibility, rendered verdicts and again completed the CSA Misconceptions Questionnaire. All four interventions significantly increased jurors’ CSA knowledge. The more they knew, the more likely they were to convict. Perceived victim credibility fully mediated the effect of CSA knowledge on verdict: information presented via expert testimony or judicial directions enhanced perceptions of victim credibility, which in turn increased convictions. Conviction rates were significantly higher in response to expert testimony from a clinical psychologist and a judicial instruction provided in the trial summation. These results are promising for courts and policy-makers grappling with low conviction rates in CSA jury trials.
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology – SAGE
Published: Aug 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.