Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Editorial Charles Watters Director,The European Centre for the Study of Migration and Social Care, University of Kent The issue of asylum reception has been central to debates concerning the appropriate treatment of asylum seekers and refugees in industrialised countries. Within the European Union attempts have been made to harmonise asylum processes, and a significant aspect of this was the introduction of the EC Asylum Directive in 2001. This document laid down minimum standards for reception, with specific reference to health and social care needs and the particular needs of vulnerable groups including children, pregnant women, the elderly and victims of torture. Despite significant strides in policy developments to harmonise reception, practice on the ground across Europe can be very variable. There are concerns that, in developing broadly agreed policies, there may be a tendency to move matters to the lowest common denominator rather than to promote the highest possible standards.This variability has been analysed as resulting in four distinct models of practice: a âNorthern Modelâ that is very centrally organised and that places a strong emphasis on bureaucratic procedures and centralised organisation, a âSouthern Modelâ in which the state often plays a less significant role in reception than international NGOs, an âEastern Modelâ representing recent attempts by new members of the EU to provide services, often in former military camps, and a âWestern Modelâ, which offers more âbottom upâ approaches by engagement, for example, with refugee community and voluntary organisations. The papers assembled here offer an insight into the contemporary nature of asylum reception in Europe. They include the accounts of service providers from one country whose task was to examine the services in another. As such, they reveal the value of looking at services as an outsider, albeit one skilled in the delivery of services to asylum seekers in another country. The authors here have developed what may be described as a âcritical reflexivityâ that enabled careful analysis of the situations in other countries and also acted as a tool for reflection on the situation in their own countries.These papers proceed from an overview from the co-ordinator of the project to a series of individual case studies.They have been edited by Rosa Hossain, the academic researcher who worked on the project.The papers offer a critical insight into both the treatment of asylum seekers in the early 21st century and the roles of service providers in delivering health and social care. International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care Volume 4 Issue 3 November 2008 © Pavilion Journals (Brighton) Ltd
International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care – Pier Professional
Published: Nov 1, 2008
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.