Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Chapman, Will Bridewell, P. Hanbury, G. Cooper, B. Buchanan (2001)
A Simple Algorithm for Identifying Negated Findings and Diseases in Discharge SummariesJournal of biomedical informatics, 34 5
Stanley Chen, Joshua Goodman (1996)
An Empirical Study of Smoothing Techniques for Language ModelingArXiv, cmp-lg/9606011
A. Stolcke (2002)
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Ozlem Uzuner (2008)
Second i2b2 workshop on natural language processing challenges for clinical records.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium
(2008)
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
R. Wicentowski, M. Sydes (2006)
Identifying Smoking Status From Implicit Information in Medical Discharge Summaries
Yuan Luo, I. Kohane (2007)
JAMIA Focus on Medical Identification Identifying Patient Smoking Status from Medical Discharge Records
Q. Zeng-Treitler, Sergey Goryachev, S. Weiss, M. Sordo, S. Murphy, R. Lazarus (2006)
Extracting principal diagnosis, co-morbidity and smoking status for asthma research: evaluation of a natural language processing systemBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6
AbstractAs part of the 2006 i2b2 NLP Shared Task, we explored two methods for determining the smoking status of patients from their hospital discharge summaries when explicit smoking terms were present and when those same terms were removed. We developed a simple keyword-based classifier to determine smoking status from de-identified hospital discharge summaries. We then developed a Naïve Bayes classifier to determine smoking status from the same records after all smoking-related words had been manually removed (the smoke-blind dataset). The performance of the Naïve Bayes classifier was compared with the performance of three human annotators on a subset of the same training dataset (n = 54) and against the evaluation dataset (n = 104 records). The rule-based classifier was able to accurately extract smoking status from hospital discharge summaries when they contained explicit smoking words. On the smoke-blind dataset, where explicit smoking cues are not available, two Naïve Bayes systems performed less well than the rule-based classifier, but similarly to three expert human annotators.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.