Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Pearson, A. Bercovitz (2006)
Use of computerized medical records in home health and hospice agencies: United States, 2000.Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey, 161
(2000)
Cost effectiveness of home and community-based long-term care services
(2009)
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/factsheet.asp?Counter¼3466 (accessed 9
(2006)
Costs and benefits of health information technology, Southern California Evidence- Based Practice Center's Report to AHRQ
R. Fazzi, Timothy Ashe, Lindsay Doak (2007)
Telehealth and technology in home care: part I. Insights from the Philips National Study on the Future of Technology and Telehealth in Home Care.Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine, 26 10
Consumer directed health : how well does it work ? Report to the President of the United States by the National Council on Disability ( NCD ) , 2006
(2008)
Healthy @ Home Report. AARP Knowledge Management
AbstractObjective This report provides updated estimates on use of electronic medical records (EMRs) in US home health and hospice (HHH) agencies, describes utilization of EMR functionalities, and presents novel data on telemedicine and point of care documentation (PoCD) in this setting.Design Nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of US HHH agencies conducted in 2007.Measurements Data on agency characteristics, current use of EMR systems as well as use of telemedicine and PoCD were collected.Results In 2007, 43% of US HHH agencies reported use of an EMR system. Patient demographics (40%) and clinical notes (34%) were the most commonly used EMR functions among US HHH agencies. Only 20% of agencies with EMR systems had health information sharing functionality and about half of them used it. Telemedicine was used by 21% of all HHH agencies, with most (87%) of these offering home health services. Among home health agencies using telemedicine, greater than 90% used telephone monitoring and about two-thirds used non-video monitoring. Nearly 29% of HHH agencies reported using electronic PoCD systems, most often for Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data capture (79%). Relative to for-profit HHH agencies, non-profit agencies used considerably more EMR (70% vs 28%, p<0.001) and PoCD (63% vs 9%, p<0.001).Conclusions Between 2000 and 2007, there was a 33% increase in use of EMR among HHH agencies in the US. In 2007, use of EMR and PoCD technologies in non-profit agencies was significantly higher than for-profit ones. Finally, HHH agencies generally tended to use available EMR functionalities, including health information sharing.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Jul 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.