Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Traditional and Newer Pathologic Factors

Traditional and Newer Pathologic Factors There has long been a pressing clinical need to identify prognostic and predictive factors for patients with breast cancer. Although numerous candidate biological and molecular markers have been identified during the last two decades, traditional factors such as lymph node status, tumor size, histologic type, histologic grade, and hormone receptor status remain the most useful indicators of prognosis and therapeutic response. A major obstacle to the translation of research advances into clinically useful prognostic and predictive markers has been the considerable methodologic variability used in the evaluation of the newer markers. It is now generally accepted that, to be useful in patient management, a putative prognostic or predictive marker must have clinical importance, independence, significance, and standardization with regard to methods, interpretation, and reporting. It is hoped that recognition and adoption of these criteria will serve to clarify the value of newer biologic and molecular markers. © Oxford University Press « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2001) 2001 (30): 22-26. This article appears in: The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer » Abstract Free Full Text (HTML) Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications I. FACTORS USED TO SELECT ADJUVANT THERAPY Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schnitt, S. J. Search for related content PubMed PubMed citation Articles by Schnitt, S. J. Related Content Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue May 2015 2015 (51) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Rights & Permissions We are mobile – find out more Journals Career Network Editor-in-Chief Carmen J. Allegra View the JNCI editorial board For Authors Instructions to authors Author Self Archiving Policy Alerting Services Email table of contents CiteTrack XML RSS feed Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints var taxonomies = ("MED00300"); Most Most Read Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Use of Integrative Therapies as Supportive Care in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000 Prevalence of Depression in Patients With Cancer Biology of Oral Mucosa and Esophagus Chapter 6: Estrogen Metabolism by Conjugation » View all Most Read articles Most Cited Chapter 1: Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer--Burden and Assessment of Causality Chapter 4: Estrogens as Endogenous Genotoxic Agents--DNA Adducts and Mutations Prevalence of Depression in Patients With Cancer Preoperative Chemotherapy in Patients With Operable Breast Cancer: Nine-Year Results From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18 Overview of the Randomized Trials of Radiotherapy in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast » View all Most Cited articles Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department. Online ISSN 1745-6614 - Print ISSN 1052-6773 Copyright © 2015 Oxford University Press Oxford Journals Oxford University Press Site Map Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal Notices Frequently Asked Questions Other Oxford University Press sites: Oxford University Press Oxford Journals China Oxford Journals Japan Academic & Professional books Children's & Schools Books Dictionaries & Reference Dictionary of National Biography Digital Reference English Language Teaching Higher Education Textbooks International Education Unit Law Medicine Music Online Products & Publishing Oxford Bibliographies Online Oxford Dictionaries Online Oxford English Dictionary Oxford Language Dictionaries Online Oxford Scholarship Online Reference Rights and Permissions Resources for Retailers & Wholesalers Resources for the Healthcare Industry Very Short Introductions World's Classics function fnc_onDomLoaded() { var query_context = getQueryContext(); PF_initOIUnderbar(query_context,":QS:default","","JRN"); PF_insertOIUnderbar(0); }; if (window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', fnc_onDomLoaded, false); } else if (window.attachEvent) { window.attachEvent('onload', fnc_onDomLoaded); } var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-189672-16"); pageTracker._setDomainName(".oxfordjournals.org"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JNCI Monographs Oxford University Press

Traditional and Newer Pathologic Factors

JNCI Monographs , Volume 2001 (30) – Dec 1, 2001

Traditional and Newer Pathologic Factors

JNCI Monographs , Volume 2001 (30) – Dec 1, 2001

Abstract

There has long been a pressing clinical need to identify prognostic and predictive factors for patients with breast cancer. Although numerous candidate biological and molecular markers have been identified during the last two decades, traditional factors such as lymph node status, tumor size, histologic type, histologic grade, and hormone receptor status remain the most useful indicators of prognosis and therapeutic response. A major obstacle to the translation of research advances into clinically useful prognostic and predictive markers has been the considerable methodologic variability used in the evaluation of the newer markers. It is now generally accepted that, to be useful in patient management, a putative prognostic or predictive marker must have clinical importance, independence, significance, and standardization with regard to methods, interpretation, and reporting. It is hoped that recognition and adoption of these criteria will serve to clarify the value of newer biologic and molecular markers. © Oxford University Press « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2001) 2001 (30): 22-26. This article appears in: The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer » Abstract Free Full Text (HTML) Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications I. FACTORS USED TO SELECT ADJUVANT THERAPY Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schnitt, S. J. Search for related content PubMed PubMed citation Articles by Schnitt, S. J. Related Content Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue May 2015 2015 (51) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Rights & Permissions We are mobile – find out more Journals Career Network Editor-in-Chief Carmen J. Allegra View the JNCI editorial board For Authors Instructions to authors Author Self Archiving Policy Alerting Services Email table of contents CiteTrack XML RSS feed Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints var taxonomies = ("MED00300"); Most Most Read Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Use of Integrative Therapies as Supportive Care in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000 Prevalence of Depression in Patients With Cancer Biology of Oral Mucosa and Esophagus Chapter 6: Estrogen Metabolism by Conjugation » View all Most Read articles Most Cited Chapter 1: Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer--Burden and Assessment of Causality Chapter 4: Estrogens as Endogenous Genotoxic Agents--DNA Adducts and Mutations Prevalence of Depression in Patients With Cancer Preoperative Chemotherapy in Patients With Operable Breast Cancer: Nine-Year Results From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18 Overview of the Randomized Trials of Radiotherapy in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast » View all Most Cited articles Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department. Online ISSN 1745-6614 - Print ISSN 1052-6773 Copyright © 2015 Oxford University Press Oxford Journals Oxford University Press Site Map Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal Notices Frequently Asked Questions Other Oxford University Press sites: Oxford University Press Oxford Journals China Oxford Journals Japan Academic & Professional books Children's & Schools Books Dictionaries & Reference Dictionary of National Biography Digital Reference English Language Teaching Higher Education Textbooks International Education Unit Law Medicine Music Online Products & Publishing Oxford Bibliographies Online Oxford Dictionaries Online Oxford English Dictionary Oxford Language Dictionaries Online Oxford Scholarship Online Reference Rights and Permissions Resources for Retailers & Wholesalers Resources for the Healthcare Industry Very Short Introductions World's Classics function fnc_onDomLoaded() { var query_context = getQueryContext(); PF_initOIUnderbar(query_context,":QS:default","","JRN"); PF_insertOIUnderbar(0); }; if (window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', fnc_onDomLoaded, false); } else if (window.attachEvent) { window.attachEvent('onload', fnc_onDomLoaded); } var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-189672-16"); pageTracker._setDomainName(".oxfordjournals.org"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/traditional-and-newer-pathologic-factors-pkYvzD34qQ

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Oxford University Press
ISSN
1052-6773
eISSN
1745-6614
DOI
jncimono;2001/30/22
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

There has long been a pressing clinical need to identify prognostic and predictive factors for patients with breast cancer. Although numerous candidate biological and molecular markers have been identified during the last two decades, traditional factors such as lymph node status, tumor size, histologic type, histologic grade, and hormone receptor status remain the most useful indicators of prognosis and therapeutic response. A major obstacle to the translation of research advances into clinically useful prognostic and predictive markers has been the considerable methodologic variability used in the evaluation of the newer markers. It is now generally accepted that, to be useful in patient management, a putative prognostic or predictive marker must have clinical importance, independence, significance, and standardization with regard to methods, interpretation, and reporting. It is hoped that recognition and adoption of these criteria will serve to clarify the value of newer biologic and molecular markers. © Oxford University Press « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2001) 2001 (30): 22-26. This article appears in: The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer » Abstract Free Full Text (HTML) Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications I. FACTORS USED TO SELECT ADJUVANT THERAPY Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schnitt, S. J. Search for related content PubMed PubMed citation Articles by Schnitt, S. J. Related Content Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue May 2015 2015 (51) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Rights & Permissions We are mobile – find out more Journals Career Network Editor-in-Chief Carmen J. Allegra View the JNCI editorial board For Authors Instructions to authors Author Self Archiving Policy Alerting Services Email table of contents CiteTrack XML RSS feed Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints var taxonomies = ("MED00300"); Most Most Read Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Use of Integrative Therapies as Supportive Care in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000 Prevalence of Depression in Patients With Cancer Biology of Oral Mucosa and Esophagus Chapter 6: Estrogen Metabolism by Conjugation » View all Most Read articles Most Cited Chapter 1: Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer--Burden and Assessment of Causality Chapter 4: Estrogens as Endogenous Genotoxic Agents--DNA Adducts and Mutations Prevalence of Depression in Patients With Cancer Preoperative Chemotherapy in Patients With Operable Breast Cancer: Nine-Year Results From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18 Overview of the Randomized Trials of Radiotherapy in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast » View all Most Cited articles Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department. Online ISSN 1745-6614 - Print ISSN 1052-6773 Copyright © 2015 Oxford University Press Oxford Journals Oxford University Press Site Map Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal Notices Frequently Asked Questions Other Oxford University Press sites: Oxford University Press Oxford Journals China Oxford Journals Japan Academic & Professional books Children's & Schools Books Dictionaries & Reference Dictionary of National Biography Digital Reference English Language Teaching Higher Education Textbooks International Education Unit Law Medicine Music Online Products & Publishing Oxford Bibliographies Online Oxford Dictionaries Online Oxford English Dictionary Oxford Language Dictionaries Online Oxford Scholarship Online Reference Rights and Permissions Resources for Retailers & Wholesalers Resources for the Healthcare Industry Very Short Introductions World's Classics function fnc_onDomLoaded() { var query_context = getQueryContext(); PF_initOIUnderbar(query_context,":QS:default","","JRN"); PF_insertOIUnderbar(0); }; if (window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', fnc_onDomLoaded, false); } else if (window.attachEvent) { window.attachEvent('onload', fnc_onDomLoaded); } var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-189672-16"); pageTracker._setDomainName(".oxfordjournals.org"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}

Journal

JNCI MonographsOxford University Press

Published: Dec 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.