Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The perils of excessive discretion: the elusive meaning of unfairness in Section 5 of the FTC Act

The perils of excessive discretion: the elusive meaning of unfairness in Section 5 of the FTC Act AbstractSection 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act gives the FTC an undefined mandate to prosecute ‘unfair methods of competition’. For nearly 100 years, the FTC has searched tirelessly for the meaning of this amorphous concept. Since 1992, the FTC has continued to define Section 5 through a series of consent decrees. Absent any external constraint, the FTC appears to have broad discretion to define the reach of Section 5 beyond the Sherman Act. This discretion causes uncertainty, which is likely to deter beneficial conduct. It also creates incentives to divert resources from productive to redistributional purposes. The recent FTC investigation of Google illustrates the FTC’s discretion to define the reach of Section 5. This article suggests several reforms, including making Section 5 coterminous with the Sherman Act, or having the FTC issue guidelines that limit Section 5 to conduct that clearly harms consumers through adverse effects on competition, and that would not otherwise fall under the antitrust laws. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Antitrust Enforcement Oxford University Press

The perils of excessive discretion: the elusive meaning of unfairness in Section 5 of the FTC Act

Download PDF
46 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/the-perils-of-excessive-discretion-the-elusive-meaning-of-unfairness-h5bcJe8eqa

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
ISSN
2050-0688
eISSN
2050-0696
DOI
10.1093/jaenfo/jnv004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractSection 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act gives the FTC an undefined mandate to prosecute ‘unfair methods of competition’. For nearly 100 years, the FTC has searched tirelessly for the meaning of this amorphous concept. Since 1992, the FTC has continued to define Section 5 through a series of consent decrees. Absent any external constraint, the FTC appears to have broad discretion to define the reach of Section 5 beyond the Sherman Act. This discretion causes uncertainty, which is likely to deter beneficial conduct. It also creates incentives to divert resources from productive to redistributional purposes. The recent FTC investigation of Google illustrates the FTC’s discretion to define the reach of Section 5. This article suggests several reforms, including making Section 5 coterminous with the Sherman Act, or having the FTC issue guidelines that limit Section 5 to conduct that clearly harms consumers through adverse effects on competition, and that would not otherwise fall under the antitrust laws.

Journal

Journal of Antitrust Enforcement – Oxford University Press

Published: Apr 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.