Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Glance, T. Osler, D. Mukamel, A. Dick (2008)
Impact of the Present-on-Admission Indicator on Hospital Quality Measurement: Experience With the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality IndicatorsMedical Care, 46
D. Baker, Stephen Persell, Jason Thompson, N. Soman, Karen Burgner, D. Liss, K. Kmetik (2007)
Automated Review of Electronic Health Records to Assess Quality of Care for Outpatients with Heart FailureAnnals of Internal Medicine, 146
J. Rozich, C. Haraden, R. Resar (2003)
Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harmQuality and Safety in Health Care, 12
G. Takata, W. Mason, C. Taketomo, T. Logsdon, P. Sharek (2008)
Development, Testing, and Findings of a Pediatric-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Medication-Related Harm in US Children's HospitalsPediatrics, 121
D. Classen, S. Pestotnik, Evans Rs, J. Burke (2005)
Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients*Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14
J. Naessens, C. Campbell, J. Huddleston, Bjorn Berg, J. Lefante, Arthur Williams, R. Culbertson (2009)
A comparison of hospital adverse events identified by three widely used detection methods.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 21 4
(2009)
Meaningful Use Workgroup . Meaningful use workgroup presentation
E. Ford, A. McAlearney, M. Phillips, N. Menachemi, Barbara Rudolph (2008)
Predicting computerized physician order entry system adoption in US hospitals: Can the federal mandate be met?International journal of medical informatics, 77 8
D. Classen, Pestotnik Sl, Evans Rs, J. Burke (1992)
Description of a computerized adverse drug event monitor using a hospital information system.Hospital pharmacy, 27 9
P. Romano, J. Geppert, Sheryl Davies, Marlene Miller, Anne Elixhauser, K. McDonald (2003)
A national profile of patient safety in U.S. hospitals.Health affairs, 22 2
M. Farquhar (2008)
AHRQ Quality Indicators
R. Resar, J. Rozich, D. Classen (2003)
Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger toolsQuality and Safety in Health Care, 12
(1997)
Special report--ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission introduces new requirements to integrate performance measurement into accreditation process.Joint Commission perspectives. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 17 1
A. Rosen, P. Rivard, Shibei Zhao, Susan Loveland, D. Tsilimingras, C. Christiansen, Anne Elixhauser, P. Romano (2005)
Evaluating the Patient Safety Indicators: How Well Do They Perform on Veterans Health Administration Data?Medical Care, 43
(2008)
National quality measures clearinghouse
M. Scanlon, J. Harris, F. Levy, A. Sedman (2008)
Evaluation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Pediatric Quality IndicatorsPediatrics, 121
Marlene Miller, Anne Elixhauser, C. Zhan, G. Meyer (2001)
Patient Safety Indicators: using administrative data to identify potential patient safety concerns.Health services research, 36 6 Pt 2
Aileen Sedman, J. Harris, Kristine Schulz, E. Schwalenstocker, Denise Remus, M. Scanlon, V. Bahl (2004)
Relevance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators for Children's HospitalsPediatrics, 115
K. Levit, Cynthia Smith, C. Cowan, H. Lazenby, A. Sensenig, Aaron Catlin (2003)
Trends in U.S. health care spending, 2001.Health affairs, 22 1
J. Jollis, M. Ancukiewicz, E. DeLong, D. Pryor, L. Muhlbaier, Daniel Mark (1993)
Discordance of Databases Designed for Claims Payment versus Clinical Information Systems: Implications for Outcomes ResearchAnnals of Internal Medicine, 119
E. Thomas, L. Petersen (2003)
Measuring errors and adverse events in health careJournal of General Internal Medicine, 18
(2008)
Health care report card compendium . 2009 [ cited 2009 08 - August ]
S. Felt-Lisk, A. Barrett, Rebecca Nyman (2007)
Public Reporting of Quality Information on Medicaid Health PlansHealth Care Financing Review, 28
P. Tang, Mary Ralston, Michelle Arrigotti, Lubna Qureshi, Justin Graham (2007)
Research Paper: Comparison of Methodologies for Calculating Quality Measures Based on Administrative Data versus Clinical Data from an Electronic Health Record System: Implications for Performance MeasuresJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 14 1
Feliciano Yu, J. Allison, E. Berner, T. Houston (2006)
CPOE in the United States.Health affairs, 25 2
(2009)
The Joint Commission. Facts about ORYX
Stephen Persell, Jennifer Wright, Jason Thompson, K. Kmetik, D. Baker (2006)
Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record.Archives of internal medicine, 166 20
Kate Rexe, S. Vigneault, Jennifer Thornhill (2008)
Public reporting: one piece of the quality improvement puzzle.Healthcare quarterly, 11 1
K. O'Malley, K. Cook, Matt Price, K. Wildes, John Hurdle, C. Ashton (2005)
Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy.Health services research, 40 5 Pt 2
V. Bahl, Maureen Thompson, T. Kau, Hsou-Mei Hu, D. Campbell (2008)
Do the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators Flag Conditions That Are Present at the Time of Hospital Admission?Medical Care, 46
AbstractObjective To examine the impact of billing and clinical data extracted from an electronic medical record system on the calculation of an adverse drug event (ADE) quality measure approved for use in The Joint Commission's ORYX program, a mandatory national hospital quality reporting system.Design The Child Health Corporation of America's “Use of Rescue Agents—ADE Trigger” quality measure uses medication billing data contained in the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) data warehouse to create The Joint Commission-approved quality measure. Using a similar query, we calculated the quality measure using PHIS plus four data sources extracted from our electronic medical record (EMR) system: medications charged, medication orders placed, medication orders with associated charges (orders charged), and medications administered.Measurements Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical for all queries. Denominators and numerators were calculated using the five data sets. The reported quality measure is the ADE rate (numerator/denominator).Results Significant differences in denominators, numerators, and rates were calculated from different data sources within a single institution's EMR. Differences were due to both common clinical practices that may be similar across institutions and unique workflow practices not likely to be present at any other institution. The magnitude of the differences would significantly alter the national comparative ranking of our institution compared to other PHIS institutions.Conclusions More detailed clinical information may result in quality measures that are not comparable across institutions due institution-specific workflow, differences that are exposed using EMR-derived data.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.