Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Meyer (1994)
Protecting Privacy in Computerized Medical InformationJAMA, 271
R. Barrows, P. Clayton (1996)
Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 3 2
Evans Rs, R. Larsen, J. Burke, Reed Gardner, Meier Fa, J. Jacobson, M. Conti, J. Jacobson, R. Hulse (1986)
Computer surveillance of hospital-acquired infections and antibiotic use.JAMA, 256 8
M. Hiller (1981)
Computers, medical records, and the right to privacy.Journal of health politics, policy and law, 6 3
E. Mazets, S. Golenetskii, V. Il’inskii, V. Panov, R. Aptekar', Yu. Gur'yan, M. Proskura, I. Sokolov, Z. Sokolova, T. Kharitonova, A. Dyatchkov, N. Khavenson (1982)
Parts I and II
S. Pestotnik, D. Classen, R. Evans, John Burke (1996)
Implementing Antibiotic Practice Guidelines through Computer-Assisted Decision Support: Clinical and Financial OutcomesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 124
M. Donaldson, K. Lohr, R. Bulger (1994)
Health Data in the Information Age: Use, Disclosure, and Privacy—Part II.JAMA, 271
A. Gelijns (1990)
Modern Methods of Clinical Investigation
W. Tierney, Michael Miller, J. Overhage, C. McDonald, C. McDonald (1993)
Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization.JAMA, 269 3
G. Kolata (1995)
When patients' records are commodities for sale.The New York times on the Web
L. Gostin, Z. Lazzarini, V. Neslund, M. Osterholm (1996)
The public health information infrastructure. A national review of the law on health information privacy.JAMA, 275 24
(1996)
Perspectives on Proposals for Federal Health Confidentiality Legislation in the United States
AbstractUnited States health care is engaged in an ambitious project to make its clinical and administrative records “100% electronic.” Substantial benefits are expected in both clinical care delivery and medical research (especially for public health surveillance and outcomes/effectiveness studies). Substantial costs also potentially accrue, beyond the large outlays for an expanded computer and telecommunications infrastructure. Privacy and confidentiality are obviously at risk if such systems cannot be made secure. Limited empirical evidence currently available suggests health information systems security may not be very good, at least in the “average” institutional setting. Privacy-focused critics of electronic record-keeping are sometimes accused of taking Luddite stands, insufficiently attentive to IT's benefits. It may also be fair to worry about a certain Panglossian tendency in “industry” commentary, insufficiently attentive to potential problems. Better federal and state laws structuring health data use will help; the industry must also attend more candidly to the technical uncertainties.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Jul 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.