Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Dranove, Chris Forman, Avi Goldfarb, S. Greenstein (2012)
The Trillion Dollar Conundrum: Complementarities and Health Information TechnologyEwing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series
R. Mokken (1971)
A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis: With Applications in Political Research
D. Blumenthal, M. Tavenner (2010)
The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records.The New England journal of medicine, 363 6
M. Furukawa, T. Raghu, Trent Spaulding, A. Vinze (2008)
Adoption of health information technology for medication safety in U.S. Hospitals, 2006.Health affairs, 27 3
A. Garg, N. Adhikari, H. Mcdonald, M. Rosas-Arellano, P. Devereaux, J. Beyene, Justina Sam, BHSc, R. Haynes (2005)
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.JAMA, 293 10
D. Dorfman (1977)
Standard errors and confidence intervals for measures of sensitivityJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62
C. DesRoches, Dustin Charles, M. Furukawa, M. Joshi, P. Kralovec, F. Mostashari, C. Worzala, A. Jha (2013)
Adoption of electronic health records grows rapidly, but fewer than half of US hospitals had at least a basic system in 2012.Health affairs, 32 8
A. Jha, C. DesRoches, E. Campbell, K. Donelan, Sowmya Rao, T. Ferris, Alexandra Shields, S. Rosenbaum, D. Blumenthal (2009)
Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.The New England journal of medicine, 360 16
L. Ark (2007)
Mokken Scale Analysis in R L
W. Schuur (2003)
Mokken Scale Analysis: Between the Guttman Scale and Parametric Item Response TheoryPolitical Analysis, 11
Renske Kuijpers, L. Ark, M. Croon (2013)
Standard Errors and Confidence Intervals for Scalability Coefficients in Mokken Scale Analysis Using Marginal ModelsSociological Methodology, 43
J. Loevinger (1948)
The technic of homogeneous tests compared with some aspects of scale analysis and factor analysis.Psychological bulletin, 45 6
B. Chaudhry, Jerome Wang, Shinyi Wu, M. Maglione, W. Mojica, E. Roth, S. Morton, P. Shekelle (2006)
Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical CareAnnals of Internal Medicine, 144
Michael Botta, David Cutler (2014)
Meaningful use: Floor or ceiling?Healthcare, 2 1
(2014)
J Am Med Inform Assoc
R. Meijer, K. Sijtsma, Nico Smid (1990)
Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of the Mokken and the Rasch Approach to IRTApplied Psychological Measurement, 14
AbstractObjective To examine whether there is a common sequence of adoption of electronic health record (EHR) functions among US hospitals, identify differences by hospital type, and assess the impact of meaningful use.Materials and methods Using 2008 American Hospital Association (AHA) Information Technology (IT) Supplement data, we calculate adoption rates of individual EHR functions, along with Loevinger homogeneity (H) coefficients, to assess the sequence of EHR adoption across hospitals. We compare adoption rates and Loevinger H coefficients for hospitals of different types to assess variation in sequencing. We qualitatively assess whether stage 1 meaningful use functions are those adopted early in the sequence.Results There is a common sequence of EHR adoption across hospitals, with moderate-to-strong homogeneity. Patient demographic and ancillary results functions are consistently adopted first, while physician notes, clinical reminders, and guidelines are adopted last. Small hospitals exhibited greater homogeneity than larger hospitals. Rural hospitals and non-teaching hospitals exhibited greater homogeneity than urban and teaching hospitals. EHR functions emphasized in stage 1 meaningful use are spread throughout the scale.Discussion Stronger homogeneity among small, rural, and non-teaching hospitals may be driven by greater reliance on vendors and less variation in the types of care they deliver. Stage 1 meaningful use is likely changing how hospitals sequence EHR adoption—in particular, by moving clinical guidelines and medication computerized provider order entry ahead in sequence.Conclusions While there is a common sequence underlying adoption of EHR functions, the degree of adherence to the sequence varies by key hospital characteristics. Stage 1 meaningful use likely alters the sequence.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Nov 22, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.