DeepDyve requires Javascript to function. Please enable Javascript on your browser to continue.
Residual Control of Soybean Loopers in Soybeans, 2013
Residual Control of Soybean Loopers in Soybeans, 2013
Bateman, N; Catchot, A L; Bao, D; Crow, W D
2022-01-01 00:00:00
Soybean | Glycine max Soybean looper | Chrysodeixis includens lambda-cyhalothrin, chlorantraniliprole, diflubenzuron On 19 July 2013, a foliar insecticide study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of soybean loopers in soybeans in Brooksville, MS, at the Black Belt Experiment Station. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block with four replications. Plot size was four rows by 40 ft long on 38 in centers. Four insecticides were evaluated against the untreated check (UTC) for control of soybean looper (SBL). Insecticides were applied with a tractor-mounted sprayer calibrated to deliver 10.0 gpa at 60 psi using TX-6 Hollow Cone nozzles (two per row) when soybeans were approximately at R1. Treatments were applied approximately 14 d prior to SBL populations infesting plots to evaluate product residual efficacy. Soybean looper population densities were determined at 7, 13, 20, 27, 34, and 41 d after treatment (DAT). Plots were sampled by taking 25 sweeps per plot with a 15-inch-diameter sweep net. Data were analyzed with ANOVA, and means were separated using Fisher’s protected LSD (P ≤ 0.05). At 7, 13, and 20 DAT, there are no significant differences among treatments for numbers of SBL larvae per 25 sweeps (Table 1). At 27 DAT, only Besiege resulted in significantly lower densities of soybean looper larvae compared with the untreated check. At 34 and 41 DAT, none of the insecticide treatments reduced soybean looper densities below those in the untreated check, but plots treated with Besiege had fewer soybean looper larvae compared with plots treated with DoubleTake (3 oz/acre) at 34 DAT or DoubleTake (both rates) at 41 DAT.1 Table 1. Treatment/formation . Rate/acre (oz form) . Average number of SBL larvae per 25 sweeps . . . 7 DAT . 13 DAT . 20 DAT . 27 DAT . 34 DAT . 41 DAT . DoubleTake 3L 4.0 0.1 0.1 1.3 5.4a 13.5ab 29.8a DoubleTake 3L 3.0 0.4 0.7 0.6 5.0a 17.0a 27.3a Dimlin 2L 2.0 0.9 0.6 1.9 4.3a 9.8ab 22.0ab Besiege 1.252SC 7.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3b 3.0b 4.3b Untreated check — 0.3 0.6 1.9 5.1a 8.8ab 15.3ab P > F 0.23 0.70 0.36 0.02 0.01 0.01 Treatment/formation . Rate/acre (oz form) . Average number of SBL larvae per 25 sweeps . . . 7 DAT . 13 DAT . 20 DAT . 27 DAT . 34 DAT . 41 DAT . DoubleTake 3L 4.0 0.1 0.1 1.3 5.4a 13.5ab 29.8a DoubleTake 3L 3.0 0.4 0.7 0.6 5.0a 17.0a 27.3a Dimlin 2L 2.0 0.9 0.6 1.9 4.3a 9.8ab 22.0ab Besiege 1.252SC 7.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3b 3.0b 4.3b Untreated check — 0.3 0.6 1.9 5.1a 8.8ab 15.3ab P > F 0.23 0.70 0.36 0.02 0.01 0.01 Means within a column sharing the same letter are not significantly different (LSD; P > 0.05). Open in new tab Table 1. Treatment/formation . Rate/acre (oz form) . Average number of SBL larvae per 25 sweeps . . . 7 DAT . 13 DAT . 20 DAT . 27 DAT . 34 DAT . 41 DAT . DoubleTake 3L 4.0 0.1 0.1 1.3 5.4a 13.5ab 29.8a DoubleTake 3L 3.0 0.4 0.7 0.6 5.0a 17.0a 27.3a Dimlin 2L 2.0 0.9 0.6 1.9 4.3a 9.8ab 22.0ab Besiege 1.252SC 7.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3b 3.0b 4.3b Untreated check — 0.3 0.6 1.9 5.1a 8.8ab 15.3ab P > F 0.23 0.70 0.36 0.02 0.01 0.01 Treatment/formation . Rate/acre (oz form) . Average number of SBL larvae per 25 sweeps . . . 7 DAT . 13 DAT . 20 DAT . 27 DAT . 34 DAT . 41 DAT . DoubleTake 3L 4.0 0.1 0.1 1.3 5.4a 13.5ab 29.8a DoubleTake 3L 3.0 0.4 0.7 0.6 5.0a 17.0a 27.3a Dimlin 2L 2.0 0.9 0.6 1.9 4.3a 9.8ab 22.0ab Besiege 1.252SC 7.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3b 3.0b 4.3b Untreated check — 0.3 0.6 1.9 5.1a 8.8ab 15.3ab P > F 0.23 0.70 0.36 0.02 0.01 0.01 Means within a column sharing the same letter are not significantly different (LSD; P > 0.05). Open in new tab 1This study was supported by industry gifts of products and/or research funding. © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png
Arthropod Management Tests
Oxford University Press
http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/residual-control-of-soybean-loopers-in-soybeans-2013-sOk1Zp3gxP
Residual Control of Soybean Loopers in Soybeans, 2013
/lp/oxford-university-press/residual-control-of-soybean-loopers-in-soybeans-2013-sOk1Zp3gxP
References
(0)
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2023 Entomological Society of America eISSN
2155-9856 DOI
10.1093/amt/tsac001
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Soybean | Glycine max Soybean looper | Chrysodeixis includens lambda-cyhalothrin, chlorantraniliprole, diflubenzuron On 19 July 2013, a foliar insecticide study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of soybean loopers in soybeans in Brooksville, MS, at the Black Belt Experiment Station. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block with four replications. Plot size was four rows by 40 ft long on 38 in centers. Four insecticides were evaluated against the untreated check (UTC) for control of soybean looper (SBL). Insecticides were applied with a tractor-mounted sprayer calibrated to deliver 10.0 gpa at 60 psi using TX-6 Hollow Cone nozzles (two per row) when soybeans were approximately at R1. Treatments were applied approximately 14 d prior to SBL populations infesting plots to evaluate product residual efficacy. Soybean looper population densities were determined at 7, 13, 20, 27, 34, and 41 d after treatment (DAT). Plots were sampled by taking 25 sweeps per plot with a 15-inch-diameter sweep net. Data were analyzed with ANOVA, and means were separated using Fisher’s protected LSD (P ≤ 0.05). At 7, 13, and 20 DAT, there are no significant differences among treatments for numbers of SBL larvae per 25 sweeps (Table 1). At 27 DAT, only Besiege resulted in significantly lower densities of soybean looper larvae compared with the untreated check. At 34 and 41 DAT, none of the insecticide treatments reduced soybean looper densities below those in the untreated check, but plots treated with Besiege had fewer soybean looper larvae compared with plots treated with DoubleTake (3 oz/acre) at 34 DAT or DoubleTake (both rates) at 41 DAT.1 Table 1. Treatment/formation . Rate/acre (oz form) . Average number of SBL larvae per 25 sweeps . . . 7 DAT . 13 DAT . 20 DAT . 27 DAT . 34 DAT . 41 DAT . DoubleTake 3L 4.0 0.1 0.1 1.3 5.4a 13.5ab 29.8a DoubleTake 3L 3.0 0.4 0.7 0.6 5.0a 17.0a 27.3a Dimlin 2L 2.0 0.9 0.6 1.9 4.3a 9.8ab 22.0ab Besiege 1.252SC 7.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3b 3.0b 4.3b Untreated check — 0.3 0.6 1.9 5.1a 8.8ab 15.3ab P > F 0.23 0.70 0.36 0.02 0.01 0.01 Treatment/formation . Rate/acre (oz form) . Average number of SBL larvae per 25 sweeps . . . 7 DAT . 13 DAT . 20 DAT . 27 DAT . 34 DAT . 41 DAT . DoubleTake 3L 4.0 0.1 0.1 1.3 5.4a 13.5ab 29.8a DoubleTake 3L 3.0 0.4 0.7 0.6 5.0a 17.0a 27.3a Dimlin 2L 2.0 0.9 0.6 1.9 4.3a 9.8ab 22.0ab Besiege 1.252SC 7.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3b 3.0b 4.3b Untreated check — 0.3 0.6 1.9 5.1a 8.8ab 15.3ab P > F 0.23 0.70 0.36 0.02 0.01 0.01 Means within a column sharing the same letter are not significantly different (LSD; P > 0.05). Open in new tab Table 1. Treatment/formation . Rate/acre (oz form) . Average number of SBL larvae per 25 sweeps . . . 7 DAT . 13 DAT . 20 DAT . 27 DAT . 34 DAT . 41 DAT . DoubleTake 3L 4.0 0.1 0.1 1.3 5.4a 13.5ab 29.8a DoubleTake 3L 3.0 0.4 0.7 0.6 5.0a 17.0a 27.3a Dimlin 2L 2.0 0.9 0.6 1.9 4.3a 9.8ab 22.0ab Besiege 1.252SC 7.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3b 3.0b 4.3b Untreated check — 0.3 0.6 1.9 5.1a 8.8ab 15.3ab P > F 0.23 0.70 0.36 0.02 0.01 0.01 Treatment/formation . Rate/acre (oz form) . Average number of SBL larvae per 25 sweeps . . . 7 DAT . 13 DAT . 20 DAT . 27 DAT . 34 DAT . 41 DAT . DoubleTake 3L 4.0 0.1 0.1 1.3 5.4a 13.5ab 29.8a DoubleTake 3L 3.0 0.4 0.7 0.6 5.0a 17.0a 27.3a Dimlin 2L 2.0 0.9 0.6 1.9 4.3a 9.8ab 22.0ab Besiege 1.252SC 7.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3b 3.0b 4.3b Untreated check — 0.3 0.6 1.9 5.1a 8.8ab 15.3ab P > F 0.23 0.70 0.36 0.02 0.01 0.01 Means within a column sharing the same letter are not significantly different (LSD; P > 0.05). Open in new tab 1This study was supported by industry gifts of products and/or research funding. © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Journal
Arthropod Management Tests
– Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2022
There are no references for this article.
System error. Please try again!
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library .
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
To subscribe to email alerts, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
APA
Bateman, N., Catchot, A., Bao, D., & Crow, W. (2022). Residual Control of Soybean Loopers in Soybeans, 2013. Arthropod Management Tests, 47(1), 1
MLA
Bateman, N, A L Catchot, D Bao, and W D Crow. "Residual Control of Soybean Loopers in Soybeans, 2013." Arthropod Management Tests 47.1 (2022)1.
Reference Managers
Export to EndNote
Export in RIS Format
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
×
Our policy towards the use of cookies
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.