Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Research ethics approval: comprehensive mechanisms are essential but not available

Research ethics approval: comprehensive mechanisms are essential but not available The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm072 Family Practice Advance Access published on 1 December 2007 Research ethics approval: comprehensive mechanisms are essential but not available a b Heather Draper and Sue Wilson Draper H and Wilson S. Research ethics approval: comprehensive mechanisms are essential but not available. Family Practice 2007; 24: 527–528. It is now widely accepted that any research involving during research as NHS staff and patients. Respect humans or identifiable human information should be for the rights of individuals, including the need to pro- undertaken according to a pre-specified protocol that tect personal information, should be accorded to all re- is submitted for consideration, comment, guidance, search participants, not only those involved in research and where appropriate, approval by a properly consti- within the NHS. It makes sense, then, to generalize the tuted ethical review committee. Similarly, recent legis- process of ethical review from the NHS to the wider lation such as the Data Protection Act, Human Tissue community so why has a central ethical review com- Act and Mental Capacity Act emphasize the impor- mittee not been introduced? There are probably many tance of ethical http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Family Practice Oxford University Press

Research ethics approval: comprehensive mechanisms are essential but not available

Family Practice , Volume 24 (6) – Dec 1, 2007

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/research-ethics-approval-comprehensive-mechanisms-are-essential-but-nKcLtoBzqj

References (10)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
ISSN
0263-2136
eISSN
1460-2229
DOI
10.1093/fampra/cmm072
pmid
18056088
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm072 Family Practice Advance Access published on 1 December 2007 Research ethics approval: comprehensive mechanisms are essential but not available a b Heather Draper and Sue Wilson Draper H and Wilson S. Research ethics approval: comprehensive mechanisms are essential but not available. Family Practice 2007; 24: 527–528. It is now widely accepted that any research involving during research as NHS staff and patients. Respect humans or identifiable human information should be for the rights of individuals, including the need to pro- undertaken according to a pre-specified protocol that tect personal information, should be accorded to all re- is submitted for consideration, comment, guidance, search participants, not only those involved in research and where appropriate, approval by a properly consti- within the NHS. It makes sense, then, to generalize the tuted ethical review committee. Similarly, recent legis- process of ethical review from the NHS to the wider lation such as the Data Protection Act, Human Tissue community so why has a central ethical review com- Act and Mental Capacity Act emphasize the impor- mittee not been introduced? There are probably many tance of ethical

Journal

Family PracticeOxford University Press

Published: Dec 1, 2007

There are no references for this article.