Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(SotoCMKleinmanKPSimonSR Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2002;2:2212473161)
SotoCMKleinmanKPSimonSR Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2002;2:2212473161SotoCMKleinmanKPSimonSR Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2002;2:2212473161, SotoCMKleinmanKPSimonSR Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2002;2:2212473161
(WeedLL Medical records, medical education and patient care: the problem oriented record as a basic tool. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, 1969)
WeedLL Medical records, medical education and patient care: the problem oriented record as a basic tool. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, 1969WeedLL Medical records, medical education and patient care: the problem oriented record as a basic tool. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, 1969, WeedLL Medical records, medical education and patient care: the problem oriented record as a basic tool. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, 1969
(LevyRPCammarnMRSmithMJ Computer handling of ambulatory clinic records. JAMA 1964;190:1033–714212286)
LevyRPCammarnMRSmithMJ Computer handling of ambulatory clinic records. JAMA 1964;190:1033–714212286LevyRPCammarnMRSmithMJ Computer handling of ambulatory clinic records. JAMA 1964;190:1033–714212286, LevyRPCammarnMRSmithMJ Computer handling of ambulatory clinic records. JAMA 1964;190:1033–714212286
Wells Ts (1883)
The Hunterian OrationBMJ, 1
J. Genest (1971)
[The quality of medical care].L'union medicale du Canada, 100 12
J. Cimino (2013)
Improving the electronic health record--are clinicians getting what they wished for?JAMA, 309 10
Author Affiliations (2012)
The truth about doctors ' handwriting : a prospective study
R. Levy, M. Cammarn, M. Smith (1964)
COMPUTER HANDLING OF AMBULATORY CLINIC RECORDS.JAMA, 190
(DearingWP Quality of medical care. Calif Med 1963;98:331–514026162)
DearingWP Quality of medical care. Calif Med 1963;98:331–514026162DearingWP Quality of medical care. Calif Med 1963;98:331–514026162, DearingWP Quality of medical care. Calif Med 1963;98:331–514026162
P. Embí, T. Yackel, Judith Logan, J. Bowen, T. Cooney, P. Gorman (2004)
Research Paper: Impacts of Computerized Physician Documentation in a Teaching Hospital: Perceptions of Faculty and Resident PhysiciansJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 11 4
(CiminoJJ Improving the electronic health record—are clinicians getting what they wished for? JAMA 2013;309:991–223483171)
CiminoJJ Improving the electronic health record—are clinicians getting what they wished for? JAMA 2013;309:991–223483171CiminoJJ Improving the electronic health record—are clinicians getting what they wished for? JAMA 2013;309:991–223483171, CiminoJJ Improving the electronic health record—are clinicians getting what they wished for? JAMA 2013;309:991–223483171
Peter Stetson, Suzanne Bakken, J. Wrenn, Eugenia Siegler (2012)
Assessing Electronic Note Quality Using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9)Applied Clinical Informatics, 03
P. Stetson, Frances Morrison, S. Bakken, Stephen Johnson (2008)
Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 15 4
(2014)
J Am Med Inform Assoc
(EmbiPJYackelTRNowenJL Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:300–915064287)
EmbiPJYackelTRNowenJL Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:300–915064287EmbiPJYackelTRNowenJL Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:300–915064287, EmbiPJYackelTRNowenJL Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:300–915064287
R. Gimbel, L. Pangaro, G. Barbour (2010)
America's “Undiscovered” Laboratory for Health Services ResearchMedical Care, 48
E. Kuenssberg (1956)
Volume and cost of keeping records in a group practice.British medical journal, 1 Suppl 2681
(BerwickDMWinickoffDE The truth about doctors’ handwriting: a prospective study. BMJ 1996;313:1657–88991021)
BerwickDMWinickoffDE The truth about doctors’ handwriting: a prospective study. BMJ 1996;313:1657–88991021BerwickDMWinickoffDE The truth about doctors’ handwriting: a prospective study. BMJ 1996;313:1657–88991021, BerwickDMWinickoffDE The truth about doctors’ handwriting: a prospective study. BMJ 1996;313:1657–88991021
S. Rosenbloom, William Stead, Joshua Denny, Dario Giuse, Nancy Lorenzi, Steven Brown, Kevin Johnson (2010)
Generating Clinical Notes for Electronic Health Record SystemsApplied Clinical Informatics, 01
(KuenssbergEV Volume and cost of keeping records in a group practice. Br Med J 1956;1(Suppl 2681):341–313316163)
KuenssbergEV Volume and cost of keeping records in a group practice. Br Med J 1956;1(Suppl 2681):341–313316163KuenssbergEV Volume and cost of keeping records in a group practice. Br Med J 1956;1(Suppl 2681):341–313316163, KuenssbergEV Volume and cost of keeping records in a group practice. Br Med J 1956;1(Suppl 2681):341–313316163
(StetsonPDMorrisonFPBakkenS Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:534–4118436914)
StetsonPDMorrisonFPBakkenS Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:534–4118436914StetsonPDMorrisonFPBakkenS Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:534–4118436914, StetsonPDMorrisonFPBakkenS Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:534–4118436914
(CusackCMHripcsakGBloomrosenM The future state of clinical data capture and documentation: a report from AMIA's 2011 Policy Meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:134–4022962195)
CusackCMHripcsakGBloomrosenM The future state of clinical data capture and documentation: a report from AMIA's 2011 Policy Meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:134–4022962195CusackCMHripcsakGBloomrosenM The future state of clinical data capture and documentation: a report from AMIA's 2011 Policy Meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:134–4022962195, CusackCMHripcsakGBloomrosenM The future state of clinical data capture and documentation: a report from AMIA's 2011 Policy Meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:134–4022962195
L. Weed (1970)
Medical records, medical education, and patient care;: The problem-oriented record as a basic tool
(StetsonPDBakkenSWrennJO Assessing election note quality using the physician documentation quality instrument (PDQI-9). Appl Clin Inform 2012;3:164–7422577483)
StetsonPDBakkenSWrennJO Assessing election note quality using the physician documentation quality instrument (PDQI-9). Appl Clin Inform 2012;3:164–7422577483StetsonPDBakkenSWrennJO Assessing election note quality using the physician documentation quality instrument (PDQI-9). Appl Clin Inform 2012;3:164–7422577483, StetsonPDBakkenSWrennJO Assessing election note quality using the physician documentation quality instrument (PDQI-9). Appl Clin Inform 2012;3:164–7422577483
(JacksonJLStrongJChengEY Patients, diagnoses, and procedures in a military internal medicine clinic: comparison with civilian practices. Mil Med 1999;164:194–710091492)
JacksonJLStrongJChengEY Patients, diagnoses, and procedures in a military internal medicine clinic: comparison with civilian practices. Mil Med 1999;164:194–710091492JacksonJLStrongJChengEY Patients, diagnoses, and procedures in a military internal medicine clinic: comparison with civilian practices. Mil Med 1999;164:194–710091492, JacksonJLStrongJChengEY Patients, diagnoses, and procedures in a military internal medicine clinic: comparison with civilian practices. Mil Med 1999;164:194–710091492
(JacksonJLChengEYJonesDL Comparison of discharge diagnoses and inpatient procedures between military and civilian health care systems. Mil Med 1999;164:701–410544622)
JacksonJLChengEYJonesDL Comparison of discharge diagnoses and inpatient procedures between military and civilian health care systems. Mil Med 1999;164:701–410544622JacksonJLChengEYJonesDL Comparison of discharge diagnoses and inpatient procedures between military and civilian health care systems. Mil Med 1999;164:701–410544622, JacksonJLChengEYJonesDL Comparison of discharge diagnoses and inpatient procedures between military and civilian health care systems. Mil Med 1999;164:701–410544622
Caitlin Cusack, G. Hripcsak, M. Bloomrosen, S. Rosenbloom, Charlotte Weaver, A. Wright, D. Vawdrey, Jim Walker, Lena Mamykina (2013)
The future state of clinical data capture and documentation: a report from AMIA's 2011 Policy MeetingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 20 1
Carlos Soto, K. Kleinman, S. Simon (2002)
Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care settingBMC Health Services Research, 2
A. Holder (1974)
The importance of medical records.JAMA, 228 1
(HansonJLStephensMBPangeroLN Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:40723164470)
HansonJLStephensMBPangeroLN Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:40723164470HansonJLStephensMBPangeroLN Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:40723164470, HansonJLStephensMBPangeroLN Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:40723164470
Kuenssberg Ev (1956)
Volume and cost of keeping records in a group practice.BMJ, 1
(GimbelRWPangaroLBarbourG America's “undiscovered laboratory for health services research. Med Care 2010;48:751–620613659)
GimbelRWPangaroLBarbourG America's “undiscovered laboratory for health services research. Med Care 2010;48:751–620613659GimbelRWPangaroLBarbourG America's “undiscovered laboratory for health services research. Med Care 2010;48:751–620613659, GimbelRWPangaroLBarbourG America's “undiscovered laboratory for health services research. Med Care 2010;48:751–620613659
J. Hanson, M. Stephens, L. Pangaro, R. Gimbel (2012)
Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative researchBMC Health Services Research, 12
L. Weed (1968)
Medical records that guide and teach.The New England journal of medicine, 278 12
(RosenbloomSTSteadWWDennyJC Generating clinical notes for electronic health record systems. Appl Clin Inform 2010;1:232–4321031148)
RosenbloomSTSteadWWDennyJC Generating clinical notes for electronic health record systems. Appl Clin Inform 2010;1:232–4321031148RosenbloomSTSteadWWDennyJC Generating clinical notes for electronic health record systems. Appl Clin Inform 2010;1:232–4321031148, RosenbloomSTSteadWWDennyJC Generating clinical notes for electronic health record systems. Appl Clin Inform 2010;1:232–4321031148
WP Dearing (1963)
Quality of medical care, 98
J. Jackson, E. Cheng, David Jones, G. Meyer (1999)
Comparison of discharge diagnoses and inpatient procedures between military and civilian health care systems.Military medicine, 164 10
Jeffrey Jackson, Jeffrey Jackson, Patrick O’Malley, Kurt Kroenke (1999)
A psychometric comparison of military and civilian medical practices.Military medicine, 164 2
Jeffrey Jackson, Jeffrey Strong, Erne Cheng, G. Meyer (1999)
Patients, diagnoses, and procedures in a military internal medicine clinic: comparison with civilian practices.Military medicine, 164 3
(JacksonJLO'MalleyPGKroenkeK A psychometric comparison of military and civilian medical practices. Mil Med 1999;164:112–1510050567)
JacksonJLO'MalleyPGKroenkeK A psychometric comparison of military and civilian medical practices. Mil Med 1999;164:112–1510050567JacksonJLO'MalleyPGKroenkeK A psychometric comparison of military and civilian medical practices. Mil Med 1999;164:112–1510050567, JacksonJLO'MalleyPGKroenkeK A psychometric comparison of military and civilian medical practices. Mil Med 1999;164:112–1510050567
Selected patient and provider characteristics for ambulatory care visits to physician of fi ces and hospital outpatient and emergency departments : United States , 2009 – 2010
Frank Lock, F. Greiss (1955)
The anesthetic hazards in obstetrics.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 70 4
(Centers for Disease Prevention and Control. Selected patient and provider characteristics for ambulatory care visits to physician offices and hospital outpatient and emergency departments: United States, 2009–2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/diabetes.htm (accessed 22 Oct 2013).)
Centers for Disease Prevention and Control. Selected patient and provider characteristics for ambulatory care visits to physician offices and hospital outpatient and emergency departments: United States, 2009–2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/diabetes.htm (accessed 22 Oct 2013).Centers for Disease Prevention and Control. Selected patient and provider characteristics for ambulatory care visits to physician offices and hospital outpatient and emergency departments: United States, 2009–2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/diabetes.htm (accessed 22 Oct 2013)., Centers for Disease Prevention and Control. Selected patient and provider characteristics for ambulatory care visits to physician offices and hospital outpatient and emergency departments: United States, 2009–2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/diabetes.htm (accessed 22 Oct 2013).
Background and objective The outpatient clinical note documents the clinician's information collection, problem assessment, and patient management, yet there is currently no validated instrument to measure the quality of the electronic clinical note. This study evaluated the validity of the QNOTE instrument, which assesses 12 elements in the clinical note, for measuring the quality of clinical notes. It also compared its performance with a global instrument that assesses the clinical note as a whole.Materials and methods Retrospective multicenter blinded study of the clinical notes of 100 outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had been seen in clinic on at least three occasions. The 300 notes were rated by eight general internal medicine and eight family medicine practicing physicians. The QNOTE instrument scored the quality of the note as the sum of a set of 12 note element scores, and its inter-rater agreement was measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient. The Global instrument scored the note in its entirety, and its inter-rater agreement was measured by the Fleiss κ.Results The overall QNOTE inter-rater agreement was 0.82 (CI 0.80 to 0.84), and its note quality score was 65 (CI 64 to 66). The Global inter-rater agreement was 0.24 (CI 0.19 to 0.29), and its note quality score was 52 (CI 49 to 55). The QNOTE quality scores were consistent, and the overall QNOTE score was significantly higher than the overall Global score (p=0.04).Conclusions We found the QNOTE to be a valid instrument for evaluating the quality of electronic clinical notes, and its performance was superior to that of the Global instrument.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Sep 1, 2014
Keywords: Electronic Health Record; Clinical Note; Clinical Quality; QNOTE; Note Quality
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.