Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jürgen Basedow (1999)
Anforderungen an eine europäische Zivilrechtsdogmatik
B. Bix (2007)
Law as an Autonomous Discipline
(2003)
For application to law, see Susan Marks, Empire's Law, 10 IND
C. Joerges (2004)
The Challenges of Europeanization in the Realm of Private Law: A Plea for a New Legal DisciplineDuke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 14
Zwischenwelten: Zur Emergenz einer interlegalen Rechtsmethodik im 187. This is true even for Germany; see Roland Kirstein, Law and Economics in Germany
Achim Hurrelmann, Zuzana Krell-Laluhová, Roland Lhotta, Frank Nullmeier, Steffen Schneider (2005)
6 Is there a legitimation crisis of the nation-state?European Review, 13
D. King (2003)
Does an Unknown World Government Exist - Impact of Commercial and Consumer LawPenn State international law review, 22
(2003)
Kelsen ’ s Conception and its Limits , 26 OX . J . LEGAL STUD . 753 ( 2006 ) ] ; for connections between Kelsen and autopoietic theory
(2002)
See the discussion in Michaels, supra note 131, at 1215-18; for similar ideas for markets, see Peter Dombrowski & Richard Mansbach, From Sovereign States to Sovereign Markets?
D. Kennedy (2000)
From the Will Theory to the Principle of Private Autonomy: Lon Fuller's "Consideration and Form"Columbia Law Review, 100
J. Rutgers (2004)
Social Justice in European Contract Law: A ManifestoEuropean Law Journal, 10
(1997)
supra note 129; see also Gunther Teubner, The King's Many Bodies: The Self-Deconstruction of Law's Hierarchy, 31 L
Lex Mercatoria : A Self - applying System Beyond National Law ?
O. Lando (1997)
Why codify the European Law of contract?European Review of Private Law
(2004)
Private Law: A Plea for a New Discipline
Chicago Unbound (1987)
The D ecline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline
Although the development of the law lay in the hands of an official, the praetor, his actual role for the development of private law was limited
A. Kanning (2005)
The Emergence of a European Private Law: Lessons from 19th Century GermanyEuropean Economics eJournal
This corresponds to ideas behind the classical will theory of contract law, similarly developed for a private law autonomous from the state and collective interests
W. Robinson (2013)
Social theory and globalization: The rise of a transnational stateTheory and Society, 30
C. Brower, J. Sharpe (2006)
The Creeping Codification of Transnational Commercial Law: An Arbitrator's PerspectiveVirginia Journal of International Law
(2005)
Nationale Privatrechtskodifikationen
E. Steindorff (2003)
Aufgaben künftiger europäischer Privatrechtsetzung angesichts deutscher Erfahrungen
(2005)
The Unknown World Government: Some Very Recent Commercial Law Developments and Gaps, 23 PENN
E. Kramer (2004)
Konvergenz und Internationalisierung der juristischen Methode
(2002)
But see Mathias Reimann, Droit positif et culture juridique. L'ambricanisation du droit par reception
(1991)
At the same time, law and economics starts to spur more disillusionment in the U.S.; see Anita Bernstein, Whatever Happened to Law and Economics
Auf dem Weg zu einem europiischen Schuldrecht?
(2000)
2002); for critique, see Klaus Ginther, Alles richtig! Otfried Hoffes Entwurf einer subsidiaren und foderalen Weltrepublik auf der Basis des Allgemeinmenschlichen
J. Habermas (2005)
Eine politische Verfassung für die pluralistische Weltgesellschaft, 38
R. Posner (1987)
The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline: 1962-1987Harvard Law Review, 100
193 AcP (1993) 121, 129 et seq.; see also JANSEN, supra note 86
Michael Barr, G. Miller (2006)
Global Administrative Law: The View from BaselEuropean Journal of International Law, 17
The End of Law, 84 B.U.L. REV. 1 (2004); see also the final sentence of LUHMANN
AbstractAlthough the changing relation between private law and the state has become the subject of many debates, these debates are often unsatisfactory. Concepts like “law,” “private law,” and “globalization” have unclear and shifting meanings; discussions are confined to specific questions and do not connect with parallel discussions taking place elsewhere. In order to initiate the necessary broader approach, this article brings together the pertinent themes and aspects from various debates. It proposes a conceptual clarification of key notions in the debate—“ private law,” “state,” “Europeanization,” “globalization,” and “privatization”—that should be of use beyond the immediate purposes of the rest of the article. It also suggests how one should analyze and categorize both the problems the modern developments create and the solutions that these problems might call for. It does not attempt to analyze which solution is the best one. But in unveiling common structures, both within and between the various debates, this article should help significantly in providing the further discussion of these solutions within a more rational framework.
American Journal of Comparative Law – Oxford University Press
Published: Oct 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.