Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Prescribing Activity During a Period of Self-Audit

Prescribing Activity During a Period of Self-Audit Prescription forms were obtained for 34 doctors who had been involved in a self-audit of psychotropic prescribing using the practice activity analysis method during the last week of February and the first of March, 1980. The forms were provided by the UK Prescription Pricing Authority after the consent of the participating doctors had been obtained. For 11 of the recorders (group 1) prescription forms were available for February and for the remaining 23 (group 2) for March. For group 1 recorders the two control weeks in the study preceded the observation week and for group 2 recorders they followed it. The total number of prescription forms issued, the number including a psychotropic drug and the number including an antibiotic were compared in the respective observation and control weeks.In group 1 there were uniform reductions of all prescribing during the observation period as compared with the controls. The reduction was attributed to a shortfall in prescription forms identified in the last week of the month. In group 2 there were no differences. The pattern of prescribing indicated by the proportions of drugs in the various categories was consistent throughout. Thus the task of undertaking self-audit did not appear to influence the underlying activity audited. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Family Practice Oxford University Press

Prescribing Activity During a Period of Self-Audit

Family Practice , Volume 2 (4) – Dec 1, 1985

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/prescribing-activity-during-a-period-of-self-audit-9JjLFQypD4

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Oxford University Press
ISSN
0263-2136
eISSN
1460-2229
DOI
10.1093/fampra/2.4.232
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Prescription forms were obtained for 34 doctors who had been involved in a self-audit of psychotropic prescribing using the practice activity analysis method during the last week of February and the first of March, 1980. The forms were provided by the UK Prescription Pricing Authority after the consent of the participating doctors had been obtained. For 11 of the recorders (group 1) prescription forms were available for February and for the remaining 23 (group 2) for March. For group 1 recorders the two control weeks in the study preceded the observation week and for group 2 recorders they followed it. The total number of prescription forms issued, the number including a psychotropic drug and the number including an antibiotic were compared in the respective observation and control weeks.In group 1 there were uniform reductions of all prescribing during the observation period as compared with the controls. The reduction was attributed to a shortfall in prescription forms identified in the last week of the month. In group 2 there were no differences. The pattern of prescribing indicated by the proportions of drugs in the various categories was consistent throughout. Thus the task of undertaking self-audit did not appear to influence the underlying activity audited.

Journal

Family PracticeOxford University Press

Published: Dec 1, 1985

There are no references for this article.