Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Performance of Selected Insecticides Against Stink Bugs Infesting Soybean 3, 2019

Performance of Selected Insecticides Against Stink Bugs Infesting Soybean 3, 2019 applyparastyle "fig//caption/p[1]" parastyle "FigCapt" Arthropod Management T ests, 47(1), 2022, 1–1 applyparastyle "fig" parastyle "Figure" https://doi.org/10.1093/amt/tsac047 Section F: Field & Cereal Crops SOYBEAN: Glycine max L. (Merr.), ‘Asgrow 45X8’ HeadA=HeadB=HeadA=HeadB/HeadA HeadB=HeadC=HeadB=HeadC/HeadB Performance of Selected Insecticides Against Stink Bugs HeadC=HeadD=HeadC=HeadD/HeadC Extract3=HeadA=Extract1=HeadA Infesting Soybean 3, 2019 History=Text=History=Text_First D. R. Cook, W. Crow, and J. Gore EDI_HeadA=EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadA=EDI_HeadB/HeadA EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadC/HeadB Delta Mississippi Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA and Corresponding author, e-mail: dcook@drec.msstate.edu EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadD=EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadD/HeadC EDI_Extract3=EDI_HeadA=EDI_Extract1=EDI_HeadA Section Editor: Clyde Sorenson ERR_HeadA=ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadA=ERR_HeadB/HeadA Soybean | Glycine max ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadC/HeadB Green stink bug | Acrosternum hilare, southern green stink bug | Nezara viridula, brown stink bug | Euschistus servus, redbanded stink ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadD=ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadD/HeadC bug | Piezodorus guildinii ERR_Extract3=ERR_HeadA=ERR_Extract1=ERR_HeadA Table 1. The performance of selected foliar insecticide treatments against stink bugs in soybean was evaluated at the Delta Research and Rate/acre Total stink bugs /25 Extension Center (Washington County). Soybean seed (Asgrow sweeps 45X8) were planted on a Sharkey clay soil on 8 July at a seeding rate of 117,612 seed/acre. Plot size was four rows (40 in centers) Treatment (fl oz product) 3 DAT 7 DAT by 40 feet. Treatments were replicated four times in an RCB. Foliar Acephate 90S 0.56 10.2ab 8.0a insecticide treatments were applied on 27 September with a high Sniper 2EC 5.12 1.9d 3.5b clearance sprayer with a compressed air spray system calibrated Belay 2.13EC 4.0 4.0bcd 4.8bc to deliver 10 gpa through TX-12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row) at Endigo ZCX 2.7CS 4.0 3.2cd 4.3bc 5 mph. Stink bug densities were determined by sampling one of Wrangler 4F 1.4 3.6cd 5.8ab the center two rows with a 15-in. -diameter sweep net. A sample Warrior II 2.08CS 1.6 6.1abc 2.5c consisted of 25 sweeps per plot. Because there was not one pre- Leverage 360 3SC 2.85 1.8d 3.0c Untreated check — 12.6a 8.0a dominate species, counts for adults and nymphs of green stink P > F <0.01 <0.01 bug, southern green stink bug, brown stink bug, and redbanded stink bug were pooled. Plots were sampled at 3 and 7 d after Means within columns followed by a common letter are not significantly dif- treatment (DAT). The same row in each plot was not sampled on ferent (FPLSD, P = 0.05). consecutive sample dates. Data were subjected to ANOVA, and lb form. per acre. means separated according to Fisher’s protected least significant Adults plus nymphs of green, southern green, brown, and redbanded stink bug. difference. Data log transformed, actual means presented. All of the insecticide treatments, except Acephate and Warrior, reduced stink bug numbers compared with the untreated check at Acephate and Wrangler, reduced stink bug numbers compared with 3 DAT (Table 1). At 7 DAT all of the insecticide treatments, except the untreated check. This research was supported in part by industry gifts of pesticides, seed, and/or re- search funding and by the Mississippi Soybean Promotion Board. © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. 1 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Arthropod Management Tests Oxford University Press

Performance of Selected Insecticides Against Stink Bugs Infesting Soybean 3, 2019

Arthropod Management Tests , Volume 47 (1): 1 – Apr 6, 2022

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/performance-of-selected-insecticides-against-stink-bugs-infesting-DVyFI82xOA
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.
eISSN
2155-9856
DOI
10.1093/amt/tsac047
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

applyparastyle "fig//caption/p[1]" parastyle "FigCapt" Arthropod Management T ests, 47(1), 2022, 1–1 applyparastyle "fig" parastyle "Figure" https://doi.org/10.1093/amt/tsac047 Section F: Field & Cereal Crops SOYBEAN: Glycine max L. (Merr.), ‘Asgrow 45X8’ HeadA=HeadB=HeadA=HeadB/HeadA HeadB=HeadC=HeadB=HeadC/HeadB Performance of Selected Insecticides Against Stink Bugs HeadC=HeadD=HeadC=HeadD/HeadC Extract3=HeadA=Extract1=HeadA Infesting Soybean 3, 2019 History=Text=History=Text_First D. R. Cook, W. Crow, and J. Gore EDI_HeadA=EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadA=EDI_HeadB/HeadA EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadB=EDI_HeadC/HeadB Delta Mississippi Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA and Corresponding author, e-mail: dcook@drec.msstate.edu EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadD=EDI_HeadC=EDI_HeadD/HeadC EDI_Extract3=EDI_HeadA=EDI_Extract1=EDI_HeadA Section Editor: Clyde Sorenson ERR_HeadA=ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadA=ERR_HeadB/HeadA Soybean | Glycine max ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadB=ERR_HeadC/HeadB Green stink bug | Acrosternum hilare, southern green stink bug | Nezara viridula, brown stink bug | Euschistus servus, redbanded stink ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadD=ERR_HeadC=ERR_HeadD/HeadC bug | Piezodorus guildinii ERR_Extract3=ERR_HeadA=ERR_Extract1=ERR_HeadA Table 1. The performance of selected foliar insecticide treatments against stink bugs in soybean was evaluated at the Delta Research and Rate/acre Total stink bugs /25 Extension Center (Washington County). Soybean seed (Asgrow sweeps 45X8) were planted on a Sharkey clay soil on 8 July at a seeding rate of 117,612 seed/acre. Plot size was four rows (40 in centers) Treatment (fl oz product) 3 DAT 7 DAT by 40 feet. Treatments were replicated four times in an RCB. Foliar Acephate 90S 0.56 10.2ab 8.0a insecticide treatments were applied on 27 September with a high Sniper 2EC 5.12 1.9d 3.5b clearance sprayer with a compressed air spray system calibrated Belay 2.13EC 4.0 4.0bcd 4.8bc to deliver 10 gpa through TX-12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row) at Endigo ZCX 2.7CS 4.0 3.2cd 4.3bc 5 mph. Stink bug densities were determined by sampling one of Wrangler 4F 1.4 3.6cd 5.8ab the center two rows with a 15-in. -diameter sweep net. A sample Warrior II 2.08CS 1.6 6.1abc 2.5c consisted of 25 sweeps per plot. Because there was not one pre- Leverage 360 3SC 2.85 1.8d 3.0c Untreated check — 12.6a 8.0a dominate species, counts for adults and nymphs of green stink P > F <0.01 <0.01 bug, southern green stink bug, brown stink bug, and redbanded stink bug were pooled. Plots were sampled at 3 and 7 d after Means within columns followed by a common letter are not significantly dif- treatment (DAT). The same row in each plot was not sampled on ferent (FPLSD, P = 0.05). consecutive sample dates. Data were subjected to ANOVA, and lb form. per acre. means separated according to Fisher’s protected least significant Adults plus nymphs of green, southern green, brown, and redbanded stink bug. difference. Data log transformed, actual means presented. All of the insecticide treatments, except Acephate and Warrior, reduced stink bug numbers compared with the untreated check at Acephate and Wrangler, reduced stink bug numbers compared with 3 DAT (Table 1). At 7 DAT all of the insecticide treatments, except the untreated check. This research was supported in part by industry gifts of pesticides, seed, and/or re- search funding and by the Mississippi Soybean Promotion Board. © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. 1 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

Journal

Arthropod Management TestsOxford University Press

Published: Apr 6, 2022

Keywords: Soybean | Glycine max; Green stink bug | Acrosternum hilare , southern green stink bug | Nezara viridula , brown stink bug | Euschistus servus , redbanded stink bug | Piezodorus guildinii; acephate; bifenthrin; lambda-cyhalothrin; thiamethoxam; imidacloprid; beta-cyfluthrin

There are no references for this article.