Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Open Prospective Recording: How is the Doctor Influenced?

Open Prospective Recording: How is the Doctor Influenced? In open prospective recording the participating doctors may be influenced by the study itself. There are two factors contributing to this influence: the doctor's status as an observer and as an observed subject. A model for analysing this influence is presented. In a Norwegian general practice study of the recording of conditions suspected of being cancer the changes owing to the recording itself have been studied by three different means: indicator comparison, time-trend analysis and post-registration enquiry. The study showed that the effect of the recording was small, and this was perhaps a result of prophylactic efforts by the doctors to minimize the influence. An influence on the doctors' actions and thinking during a period of registration should always be expected, and control methods to give a semi-quantitative expression of the consequences of this influence should therefore be carried out. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Family Practice Oxford University Press

Open Prospective Recording: How is the Doctor Influenced?

Family Practice , Volume 3 (4) – Jan 1, 1986

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/open-prospective-recording-how-is-the-doctor-influenced-xyqtqLKakR

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Oxford University Press
ISSN
0263-2136
eISSN
1460-2229
DOI
10.1093/fampra/3.4.240
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In open prospective recording the participating doctors may be influenced by the study itself. There are two factors contributing to this influence: the doctor's status as an observer and as an observed subject. A model for analysing this influence is presented. In a Norwegian general practice study of the recording of conditions suspected of being cancer the changes owing to the recording itself have been studied by three different means: indicator comparison, time-trend analysis and post-registration enquiry. The study showed that the effect of the recording was small, and this was perhaps a result of prophylactic efforts by the doctors to minimize the influence. An influence on the doctors' actions and thinking during a period of registration should always be expected, and control methods to give a semi-quantitative expression of the consequences of this influence should therefore be carried out.

Journal

Family PracticeOxford University Press

Published: Jan 1, 1986

There are no references for this article.