Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

M.M. Faiziev: Sovetskoe Sravnitel’noe Pravovedenie v. Usloviiakh Federatsii

M.M. Faiziev: Sovetskoe Sravnitel’noe Pravovedenie v. Usloviiakh Federatsii BOOK REVIEWS 1989] 421 mercial law. The text does not embark upon the problems of other types of unification. Presumably, it is now recognized as undesir­ able. Secretary General Gorbachev has expressed his sense that ther e is no need to homogenize cultures close to a Soviet model. Each socialist country is told that it may create its own path to so­ cialism. While it is unlikely that a path leading to a capitalist ori­ ented system would be welcomed by Soviet policy makers, even they are breaching the doctrinal wall Stalin constructed. All are intro­ ducing mixed economies, with joint ventures with capitalist firms and widespread reestablishment of the cooperatives which Stalin forbade. Artisans are authorized to conduct previously forbidden trades. Evidently, unification of economic structures is no longer en­ visaged. The would-be unifiers now concern themselves with com­ mercial details and no more. This book could have been a report on a conference anywhere in the Romanist legal world. Perhaps that is the major import of its message for Westerners who try to plot the future of Eastern Europe. SOVETSKOE SRAVNITEL'NOE PRAVOVEDENIE V USLOVIIAKH FEDERAT- SII. (Soviet Comparative Legal Science under Conditions of Federa­ tion). By M.M. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Comparative Law Oxford University Press

M.M. Faiziev: Sovetskoe Sravnitel’noe Pravovedenie v. Usloviiakh Federatsii

American Journal of Comparative Law , Volume 37 (2) – Apr 1, 1989

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/m-m-faiziev-sovetskoe-sravnitel-noe-pravovedenie-v-usloviiakh-Q180K5DayS

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© 1989 by The American Association for the Comparative Study of Law, Inc.
ISSN
0002-919X
eISSN
2326-9197
DOI
10.2307/840179
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

BOOK REVIEWS 1989] 421 mercial law. The text does not embark upon the problems of other types of unification. Presumably, it is now recognized as undesir­ able. Secretary General Gorbachev has expressed his sense that ther e is no need to homogenize cultures close to a Soviet model. Each socialist country is told that it may create its own path to so­ cialism. While it is unlikely that a path leading to a capitalist ori­ ented system would be welcomed by Soviet policy makers, even they are breaching the doctrinal wall Stalin constructed. All are intro­ ducing mixed economies, with joint ventures with capitalist firms and widespread reestablishment of the cooperatives which Stalin forbade. Artisans are authorized to conduct previously forbidden trades. Evidently, unification of economic structures is no longer en­ visaged. The would-be unifiers now concern themselves with com­ mercial details and no more. This book could have been a report on a conference anywhere in the Romanist legal world. Perhaps that is the major import of its message for Westerners who try to plot the future of Eastern Europe. SOVETSKOE SRAVNITEL'NOE PRAVOVEDENIE V USLOVIIAKH FEDERAT- SII. (Soviet Comparative Legal Science under Conditions of Federa­ tion). By M.M.

Journal

American Journal of Comparative LawOxford University Press

Published: Apr 1, 1989

There are no references for this article.