Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Massaro (1993)
Introducing Physician Order Entry at a Major Academic Medical Center: I. Impact on Organizational Culture and BehaviorAcademic Medicine, 68
T. Massaro (1993)
Introducing Physician Order Entry at a Major Academic Medical Center: II. Impact on Medical EducationAcademic Medicine, 68
D. Bates, A. O'Neil, D. Boyle, J. Teich, G. Chertow, A. Komaroff, T. Brennan (1994)
Research Paper: Potential Identifiability and Preventability of Adverse Events Using Information SystemsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 1 5
I feel that 1 can benelit from refresher classes on order entry
Compared to paper ordering, order entry slows me down
D. Bates, G. Kuperman, J. Teich (1994)
Computerized physician order entry and quality of care.Quality management in health care, 2 4
M. Johnston, K. Langton, R. Haynes, A. Mathieu (1994)
Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of ResearchAnnals of Internal Medicine, 120
(1994)
Impact of computer order entry on physicians ’ time
(1993)
Acad Med
J. Teich, J. Hurley, R. Beckley, M. Aranow (1992)
Design of an easy-to-use physician order entry system with support for nursing and ancillary departments.Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care
When I need help on order entry, I can find it
Order entry gives me the information I need to write better orders
Jonathan Teich, Cynthia Spurr, J. Schmiz, Eileen O'Connell, Debra Thomas (1995)
Enhancement of clinician workflow with computer order entry.Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care
E. Shortliffe (1986)
Medical expert systems--knowledge tools for physicians.The Western journal of medicine, 145 6
Displaying charges for ancillary tests affected the tests I order. 15. Displaying charges for ancillary tests is annoying
R. Gardner, H. Lundsgaarde (1994)
Research Paper: Evaluation of User Acceptance of a Clinical Expert systemJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 1 6
W. Tierney, Michael Miller, J. Overhage, C. McDonald, C. McDonald (1993)
Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization.JAMA, 269 3
Overall, I am satisfied with the order entry system
Dean Sittig, W. Stead (1994)
Review: Computer-based Physician Order Entry: The State of the ArtJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 1 2
(1976)
A rating scale for measuring product/service American perceptions of life quality
(1995)
Managing a transformational technology : a field study of the implementation of profiling
D. Bates, D. Cullen, N. Laird (1995)
Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug eventsInternational Journal of Trauma Nursing, 1
J. Teich, C. Spurr, S. Flammini, J. Schmiz, R. Beckley, J. Hurley, M. Aranow, J. Glaser (1993)
Response to a trial of physician-based inpatient order entry.Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care
D. Bates, G. Kuperman, E. Rittenberg, J. Teich, A. Onderdonk, J. Winkelman, A. Komaroff, M. Tanasijevic (1995)
Reminders for Redundant Tests: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
When I have a problem with order entry, I just ask someone for help
The order entry system is reliable --it does its job consistently
AbstractObjectives: To evaluate user satisfaction, correlates of satisfaction, and self-reported usage patterns regarding physician order entry (POE) in one hospital.Design: Surveys were sent to physician and nurse POE users from medical and surgical services.Results: The users were generally satisfied with POE (mean = 5.07 on a 1 to 7 scale). The physicians were more satisfied than the nurses, and the medical staff were more satisfied than the surgical staff; satisfaction levels were acceptable (more than3.50) even in the less satisfied groups. Satisfaction was highly correlated with perceptions about POE's effects on productivity, ease of use, and speed. POE features directed at improving the quality of care were less strongly correlated with satisfaction. The physicians valued POE's off-floor accessibility most, and the nurses valued legibility and accuracy of POE orders most. Some features, such as off-floor ordering, were perceived to be highly useful and reported to be frequently used by the physicians; while other features, such as “quick mode” ordering and personal order sets, received little self-reported use.Conclusions: Survey of POE users showed that satisfaction with POE was good. Satisfaction was more correlated with perceptions about POE's effect on productivity than with POE's effect on quality of care. Physicians and nurses constitute two very different types of users, underscoring the importance of involving both physicians and nonphysicians in POE development. The results suggest that development efforts should focus on improving system speed, adding on-line help, and emphasizing quality benefits of POE.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.