Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Identifying patients with chronic kidney disease from general practice computer records

Identifying patients with chronic kidney disease from general practice computer records Background. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important predictor of end-stage renal disease, as well as a marker of increased mortality. The New Opportunities for Early Renal Intervention by Computerised Assessment (NEOERICA) project aimed to assess whether people with undiagnosed CKD who might benefit from early intervention could be identified from GP computer records.Methods. The simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation was used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and determine stage of CKD in patients from 12 practices in Surrey, Kent and Greater Manchester with SCr recorded in their notes. Further data were extracted on associated co-morbidities and potentially modifiable risk factors.Results. One quarter (25.7%; 28 862/112 215) had an SCr recorded and one in five (18.9%) of them had a GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (equivalent to Stage 3–5 CKD), representing 4.9% of the population. Only 3.6% of these were recorded as having renal disease. Three-quarters (74.6%; 4075/5449) of those with Stage 3–5 CKD had one or more circulatory diseases; 346 were prescribed potentially nephrotoxic drugs and over 4000 prescriptions were issued for drugs recommended to be used with caution in renal impairment.Conclusions. Patients with CKD can be identified by searching GP computer databases; along with associated co-morbidities and treatment. Results revealed a similar rate of Stage 3–5 CKD to that found previously in the USA. The very low rate of recording of renal disease in patients found to have CKD indicates scope for improving detection and early intervention. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Family Practice Oxford University Press

Identifying patients with chronic kidney disease from general practice computer records

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/identifying-patients-with-chronic-kidney-disease-from-general-practice-FZKZdP3AYp

References (22)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
ISSN
0263-2136
eISSN
1460-2229
DOI
10.1093/fampra/cmi026
pmid
15814579
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Background. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important predictor of end-stage renal disease, as well as a marker of increased mortality. The New Opportunities for Early Renal Intervention by Computerised Assessment (NEOERICA) project aimed to assess whether people with undiagnosed CKD who might benefit from early intervention could be identified from GP computer records.Methods. The simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation was used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and determine stage of CKD in patients from 12 practices in Surrey, Kent and Greater Manchester with SCr recorded in their notes. Further data were extracted on associated co-morbidities and potentially modifiable risk factors.Results. One quarter (25.7%; 28 862/112 215) had an SCr recorded and one in five (18.9%) of them had a GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (equivalent to Stage 3–5 CKD), representing 4.9% of the population. Only 3.6% of these were recorded as having renal disease. Three-quarters (74.6%; 4075/5449) of those with Stage 3–5 CKD had one or more circulatory diseases; 346 were prescribed potentially nephrotoxic drugs and over 4000 prescriptions were issued for drugs recommended to be used with caution in renal impairment.Conclusions. Patients with CKD can be identified by searching GP computer databases; along with associated co-morbidities and treatment. Results revealed a similar rate of Stage 3–5 CKD to that found previously in the USA. The very low rate of recording of renal disease in patients found to have CKD indicates scope for improving detection and early intervention.

Journal

Family PracticeOxford University Press

Published: Jun 6, 2005

There are no references for this article.